tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

Industrials · Electrical Equipment · NYSE

BEBloom Energy

Compare with peers → Embed
The 10-K against last year's

415 changes: 62 added, 259 removed, 92 reworded, 2 quiet changes

10-K Feb 9, 2026 vs Feb 27, 2025
Risk FactorsRedline ↓
78.6%
of the text changed · 2,602 words now
56.0%
of the text changed · 14,959 words now
Legal ProceedingsRedline ↓
32.6%
of the text changed · 1,519 words now
Accounting PoliciesRedline ↓
32.1%
of the text changed · 8,725 words now

10-K 0001628280-26-006516 (2026-02-09) vs 10-K 0001628280-25-008747 (2025-02-27)

The redline

The paragraph that changed most in each section

Marked against last year's 10-K: cut words struck through, new words highlighted and underlined.

MD&A 259 words changed in this paragraph; it is 31% similar to last year's version.
General Research and administrative development expenses increased by $4.2 $37.4 million in the for year ended December 31, 2024, as 2025, compared to the prior year period. This The increase was primarily driven by by: (1) an increase in employee compensation and benefits of $10.3 benefits, which increased by $24.2 million, largely due to higher stock-based compensation and variable compensation expenses, (2) consumable laboratory supplies and other lab-related costs, which increased by $12.3 million, reflecting expanded research activities, (3) consulting, advisory, and professional services costs, which increased by $1.9 million, predominantly due to (i) stock-based compensation expenses recognized in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2024 as a result of an equity grant third‑party engineering, certification, and regulatory support for scaling our solid‑oxide platforms and for AI data‑center power programs, (4) computer equipment costs, which increased by $1.3 million, primarily due to our Chief Executive Officer, increased spending on hardware and (ii) software maintenance, and (5) an increase in employee compensation for executive new hires, partially offset by an effect of the restructuring efforts in the second half of fiscal year 2023, as well as the voluntary resignation of certain of our executives in the second half of fiscal year 2023, (2) an increase in depreciation travel and entertainment expenses of $3.5 million, $0.7 million for year ended December 31, 2025, due to higher in-person engagement and (3) an increase in computer equipment maintenance expenses of $3.1 million. event participation. The overall increase was partially offset by (1) a decrease in office other research and development expenses of $8.0 million, (2) a decrease in facility costs of $3.2 million, primarily due to reduction in rent and utility costs, (3) a decrease in (i) consulting, advisory and other professional services costs, (ii) travel and entertainment, and (iii) other operating expenses of $0.7 million, $0.4 million, and $0.4 million, respectively, as a result of our cost reduction efforts initiated in fiscal million for year 2023. ended December 31, 2025.

Source: Item 7, 10-K 0001628280-26-006516 vs Item 7, 10-K 0001628280-25-008747

Accounting Policies 219 words changed in this paragraph; it is 30% similar to last year's version.
In March 2024, July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2024-01, Compensation — Stock Compensation Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2025-05, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 718): Scope Application 326): Measurement of Profits Interest Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Similar Awards Contract Assets (“ASU 2024-01”). 2025-05”). This guidance is intended to improve U.S. GAAP. by adding an illustrative example to demonstrate how update introduces a practical expedient for all entities when estimating expected credit losses for current accounts receivable and current contract assets arising from transactions accounted for under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Under the practical expedient, when developing reasonable and supportable forecasts as part of estimating expected credit losses, an entity should apply may assume that current conditions as of the scope guidance in paragraph 718-10-15-3 to determine whether profits interest and similar awards (“profits interest awards”) should be accounted balance sheet date do not change for in accordance with Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation. The amendments in the remaining life of the asset. ASU 2024-01 are 2025-05 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2024, 2025, and interim periods reporting within those annual reporting periods. The amendments Early adoption is permitted in ASU 2024-01 should be applied either (1) retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements or (2) prospectively to profits interest both interim and similar awards granted or modified on or after the date at which the entity first applies the amendments. annual reporting periods. We are currently evaluating this guidance, but do not expect the adoption impact of this guidance to have a material impact ASU 2025-05 on our consolidated financial statements.

Source: Item 8, Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, 10-K 0001628280-26-006516 vs Item 8, Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, 10-K 0001628280-25-008747

Legal Proceedings 165 words changed in this paragraph; it is 40% similar to last year's version.
On February 23, 2023, we filed an amended complaint adding additional causes of action and filed objections to the Magistrate’s report and recommendation. On April 26, 2023, Judge Gilstrap overruled our objections to the Magistrate’s report and recommendation and stayed the district court action pending arbitrability determinations by the arbitrator in the WIPO proceeding. The arbitration had been held in abeyance awaiting the decision of the Eastern District of Texas. A hearing by the arbitrator in WIPO on arbitrability took place on June 27, 2023. On October 2, 2023, the arbitrator in the WIPO proceeding issued a ruling concluding that all the parties’ claims were arbitrable. On November 18, 2023, the arbitrator bifurcated the arbitration into a first phase that will focus focusing on Bloom’s claims directed to improper inventorship of the Patents-in-Suit and Bloom’s defective product claims. Briefing on the first phase took place throughout 2024 with a potential and the first half of 2025. An evidentiary hearing to be scheduled in with witness testimony commenced on July 21, 2025, and continued through August 1, 2025. Post hearing briefs were submitted on October 3, 2025. There is no set time frame for a decision from the Arbitrator on the first phase of the arbitration. We are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of the arbitration at this time.

Source: Item 3, via Note 13 – Commitments and Contingencies, 10-K 0001628280-26-006516 vs Item 3, via Note 13 – Commitments and Contingencies, 10-K 0001628280-25-008747

Risk Factors 62 words changed in this paragraph; it is 71% similar to last year's version.
Our products have significant upfront costs, which may be a barrier for some customers who may not have the financial capability to purchase our products directly. To address this, we have developed various financing options that allow customers to use our products through third-party financing arrangements. These options enable our customers to access our products without making a direct purchase. For more information on the different financing arrangements available, please see Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Purchase and Financing Options. If in any given quarter we or our customers are not able to secure funding, our financial condition and results of operations would be harmed. To attract new customers, we regularly innovate our customer contracts which may have different terms and financing conditions from prior transactions.

Source: Item 1A, 10-K 0001628280-26-006516 vs Item 1A, 10-K 0001628280-25-008747

Every change, by type

Sentences and paragraphs added, removed or reworded

Sentences and paragraphs of BE's Risk Factors and MD&A, 10-K 2026-02-09 against 10-K 2025-02-27. Each links to the text at sec.gov.

AddedRisk Factors
• Our AI customer mix is increasing due to the continued adoption of AI tools, and the resulting growth in AI data centers and their resulting power needs to support our business expansion. Slower expansion of AI data centers due to actual or perceived deceleration in AI adoption or other factors could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-09 at sec.gov ↗

AddedRisk Factors
• Our internal computer systems, and those of our third-party providers, may fail or suffer from events beyond our control, including from cybersecurity events, which could reduce revenue and earnings, increase expenses and expose us to legal and regulatory claims.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-09 at sec.gov ↗

AddedRisk Factors
• We increasingly rely on the collection, processing, storage, sharing, and analysis of large volumes of data that requires strong data governance.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-09 at sec.gov ↗

AddedMD&A
Bloom Energy is a global leader in onsite power generation, delivering a foundational platform purpose-built for the digital era and the global energy transition. We manufacture a versatile fuel cell energy platform, supporting the commercial availability of two primary products: the Bloom Energy Server® fuel cell system for generating electricity and the Bloom Electrolyzer™ for producing hydrogen. Our primary product, the Bloom Energy Server is a proprietary high-temperature solid-oxide fuel cell technology that converts fuels—including natural gas, biogas, and hydrogen—into electricity at high density without combustion or moving parts, achieving lower emissions and higher efficiency than legacy systems.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-09 at sec.gov ↗

AddedMD&A
We design, manufacture, distribute, and operate the Bloom Energy Server to provide resilient, distributed power for critical operations. Our mission is to make clean, reliable energy affordable, giving enterprises control over cost, resilience, and sustainability. Bloom serves Fortune 500 companies across the data center, semiconductor manufacturing, AI infrastructure, utility, and other industrial sectors.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-09 at sec.gov ↗

AddedMD&A
Headquartered in Silicon Valley, Bloom Energy employs more than 2,000 people worldwide and manufactures its systems in the United States. Bloom has its Energy Server systems deployed across approximately 1,100 sites in 9 countries, empowering businesses and critical infrastructure worldwide.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-09 at sec.gov ↗

AddedMD&A
Demand for Power is Increasing, Driven by Data Centers and Artificial Intelligence. U.S. electricity demand has entered a new growth phase after years of limited expansion, driven by a rapid buildout of AI and cloud data centers and renewed investment in domestic manufacturing. AI workloads require significant and continuously available power, while reshoring across sectors such as semiconductors and advanced materials is creating new large loads. Existing electricity customers in states with heavy AI and cloud data center development are also raising concerns over rate increases they attribute to this new demand for power. These developments are reshaping demand patterns and increasing the need for dependable,

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-09 at sec.gov ↗

AddedMD&A
Policy Support has been Increasing for AI leadership and Energy Security. U.S. federal policy discussions increasingly link AI competitiveness with energy availability, emphasizing the importance of reliable near-term power sources. Recent actions recognize natural gas as a practical bridge resource for meeting immediate load growth while longer-term decarbonization pathways evolve. Over the same period, certain renewable incentives have become more time-limited, affecting the pace and predictability of new renewable additions. We believe these shifts are influencing customer planning and procurement decisions as they evaluate firm, rapidly deployable power options.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-09 at sec.gov ↗

Show the other 7
AddedMD&A
Grid Constraints and Permitting Delays are Extending Time to Power for Traditional New Facilities and Expansions. As electricity demand accelerates, grid capacity is not expanding at the same pace. Extended permitting timelines and supply chain constraints dictate that transmission additions remain limited, and generator interconnection queues at the end of 2024 totaled 2,300 gigawatts, with typical timelines extending multiple years and further delays. Even with regulatory reforms, the timelines associated with system upgrades required for reliability and deliverability continue to translate to long lead times. “Time to power” has become a central constraint for organizations planning new facilities or expansions providing an opportunity for power sources like our products that can be co-located on-site where the demand is needed and be grid-independent..

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-09 at sec.gov ↗

AddedMD&A
Shift Toward Onsite Power Generation is Occurring. To address schedule certainty and bypass grid bottlenecks, large-load customers—particularly data center operators—are increasingly evaluating onsite generation as part of their energy strategy. Onsite systems, when islanded, can allow customers to control deployment timelines, secure reliable baseload supply and reduce delays associated with lengthy permitting and interconnection processes. Industry analyses and surveys indicate meaningful growth in distributed and onsite generation through the end of the decade.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-09 at sec.gov ↗

AddedMD&A
Limitations Among Traditional OEMs and Utilities are Extending Delivery Timelines. Traditional power generation OEMs are experiencing extended delivery timelines as demand for firm power solutions increases across data centers, industrial facilities and utility markets. Lead times for turbines, engines and other conventional equipment have lengthened due to global order volumes, supply chain constraints and component availability. In some cases, delivery windows span multiple years, limiting customers’ ability to add capacity on required schedules. We see these constraints contributing to increased interest in modular, rapidly deployable power solutions.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-09 at sec.gov ↗

AddedMD&A
Utility companies are exploring alternative means of producing and supplying energy to their end customers, including our Energy Server systems. We entered into agreements with utilities in 2024, including a landmark 1 GW supply framework agreement with a customer and began executing on the order in 2024.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-09 at sec.gov ↗

AddedMD&A
Utility Load Growth and Capacity Constraints are Creating Affordability Pressures. Utilities face rising load growth, cost pressures, and heightened scrutiny from both commercial and residential customers. Large users cite higher rates, reliability challenges and extended interconnection timelines, while households face increased affordability concerns as electricity takes a larger share of monthly spending. These dynamics are prompting utilities to explore more flexible and capital-efficient ways to serve load, including behind-the-meter and sleeved on-site generation arrangements that can be deployed more quickly and without extensive grid upgrades.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-09 at sec.gov ↗

AddedMD&A
The Trump Administration has issued multiple Executive Orders enabling domestic energy production and AI development and is taking further actions to effectuate that intent, including the National Energy Emergency Declaration, Unleashing American Energy, Accelerating Permitting of Datacenter Infrastructure, and the AI Action Plan. In July 2025, the DOE issued a “Report on Evaluating U.S. Grid Reliability and Security,” which found that without intervention, blackouts could increase dramatically due to surging electricity demand and inadequate capacity supply, particularly in parts of the PJM Interconnection (PJM), Southwest Power Pool (SPP), Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), and Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) regional markets. In October 2025, the DOE Secretary issued a proposed rulemaking, which if enacted would establish federal standards on customer self-generation and behind-the-meter configurations, creating more uniform pathways for onsite, utility-scale fuel cell deployments.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-09 at sec.gov ↗

AddedMD&A
During 2025, FERC likewise echoed resource adequacy concerns and began addressing whether existing market rules and tariffs properly address onsite generation in light of the rapid buildout of AI and cloud data centers, and is now addressing substantive issues raised in the DOE proposed rulemaking. The rule changes FERC is considering could significantly affect the speed at which Bloom Energy Server systems interconnect to the transmission grid. We expect substantive findings by FERC during 2026.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-09 at sec.gov ↗

Next Related parties →