Marked against last year's 10-K:
cut words struck through, new words highlighted and underlined.
Risk Factors 480 words changed in this paragraph; it is 32% similar to last year's version.
In the United States and other countries, government and private sector access to health care products continues to be a subject of focus, and efforts to reduce health care costs are being made by third-party payors. Most of our customers rely on third-party payors, including government programs and private health insurance plans, to cover the cost of the G6, G7 G7, G-7 15 Day, Dexcom One, and Dexcom One. ONE+. We expect that these continuing cost reduction and containment measures could result in lower prices for these products and lower reimbursement rates, as well as could lead to patients being unable to obtain approval for coverage or payment from these third-party payors resulting in costs being shifted to patients for these products. Additionally, we may experience pricing pressure if our products are increasingly subject to competitive bidding processes, which include substantial costs and managerial time to prepare bids and proposals for contracts that may not be awarded to us or may be split among competitors. For example, in June 2025, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services published a proposed rule that would subject continuous glucose monitors to the competitive bidding process, which could negatively impact our reimbursement and result in price decreases. In late 2025, CMS extended the DMEPOS competitive bidding program to include our CGMs and receivers, with contracting beginning in 2027 and payment changes taking effect in 2028. Under the program, DMEPOS suppliers compete to become Medicare contract suppliers by submitting bids to furnish certain items in CBAs. CMS anticipates that ten (10) contracts will be awarded for CGMs. However, while the competitive bidding program previously used CBAs for contract awards, CMS determined that for CGMs and certain other DME, a RID CBA was more appropriate. It remains to be seen whether CGMs will be covered under a single, nationwide RID CBA or whether regional RID CBAs will be established. In any event, the bid process is expected to result in lower Medicare reimbursement for CGM systems, particularly because CMS is changing the pricing under the RID CBA by setting a single payment amount for covered items at the 75th percentile of the winning bids, rather than using the maximum winning bid. Further, CMS has reclassified CGMs and insulin infusion pumps to items that require frequent and substantial servicing and will phase in monthly rental payments for these items. CMS will bundle the rental amount for the receiver device with payment for the supplies and accessories in the new payment amount. The bid limit will be monthly fee schedule amounts for the supplies plus the average purchase fee schedule amounts for the CGM receiver device divided by 60 (intended to capture the 5-year useful life of the device.) As a result, we expect that Medicare reimbursement for our CGM systems will decrease beginning in 2028. CMS is required by law to recompete these contracts at least once every three years and to roll out the competitive bidding process nationally or adjust prices in non-competitive bidding areas to match competitive bidding prices. The implementation of the competitive bidding program is expected to result in reduced Medicare payment for CGMs in both competitive bidding areas and non-competitive bidding areas. Additionally, the new bidding system will contain a “country of origin” question to obtain information on where products are manufactured; however, it is unclear how CMS intends to use this information. Given that we maintain offshore manufacturing facilities, country of origin reporting could have an impact on our business. Competitive bidding could negatively impact our reimbursement and result in price decreases. To the extent these
Source: Item 1A, 10-K 0001093557-26-000027 vs Item 1A, 10-K 0001093557-25-000036
MD&A 190 words changed in this paragraph; it is 39% similar to last year's version.
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2024 December 31, 2023 Operating Cash Flows $576.2 $260.1 million of increase in net income and $304.5 $196.5 million of increase in net non-cash adjustments, and a net increase of $108.8 million in changes of working capital balances $541.5 million of net adjustments primarily due to adjustments to deferred income and $203.8 million of net non-cash adjustments, and a net increase of $3.2 million in changes of working capital balances Net non-cash adjustments were primarily related to share-based compensation and depreciation and amortization. Net non-cash adjustments were primarily related to share-based compensation and depreciation and amortization. taxes, partially offset by gains on equity investments Investing Cash Flows $248.1 $670.0 million increase in net proceeds from marketable securities $253.0 due to the management of our liquidity $62.1 million in net purchases of marketable securities $358.8 million in capital expenditures $236.6 million in capital expenditures $81.3 million in purchases of non-marketable equity securities $19.5 million decrease in purchases of non-marketable equity securities Financing Cash Flows $28.2 $250.0 million decrease in proceeds from issuance of cash used to repurchase our common stock under $1.21 billion increase in cash used upon the maturity of our employee stock plans $1.23 billion in proceeds from issuance of senior convertible notes, net of issuance costs $750.0 million in purchases of treasury stock $26.6 million in proceeds from issuance of common stock under our employee stock plans $787.3 million in payments for conversions of senior convertible notes $688.7 million in purchases of treasury stock $101.3 million in purchases of capped call transactions 2025 Notes
Source: Item 7, 10-K 0001093557-26-000027 vs Item 7, 10-K 0001093557-25-000036
Legal Proceedings 140 words changed in this paragraph; it is 66% similar to last year's version.
Between August 21 and October 9, 2024, three substantially similar putative class action complaints were filed against us and certain of our executive officers in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. On December 13, 2024, the court appointed lead plaintiff court and consolidated the three actions (now captioned In Re: re Dexcom, Inc. Class Action Securities Litigation, Lead Case No.: 24-cv-1485-RSH-VET). On January 27, 2025, lead plaintiff filed a consolidated complaint. The consolidated complaint alleges violations of the Securities Exchange Act against us and certain of our current and former executive officers for allegedly making false and misleading statements between April 28, 2023 and July 25, 2024, with respect to our expected revenue for fiscal 2024 and ability to capitalize on our growth potential. Our On March 13, 2025, we filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint. On May 14, 2025, the court granted the motion to dismiss with leave to amend. On May 28, 2025, lead plaintiff filed an amended consolidated complaint. On June 11, 2025, we filed a motion to dismiss the amended consolidated complaint. On September 9, 2025, the court granted in part and denied in part the motion to dismiss. On October 7, 2025, defendants answered the amended consolidated complaint. On October 10, 2025, defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings as to the two surviving challenged statements. On January 7, 2026, the court granted defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings with leave to amend. On February 6, 2026, lead plaintiff filed a second amended consolidated complaint. Defendants’ deadline to respond to the second amended consolidated complaint is March 13, 2025. February 20, 2026.
Source: Item 3, 10-K 0001093557-26-000027 vs Item 3, 10-K 0001093557-25-000036
Accounting Policies 64 words changed in this paragraph; it is 47% similar to last year's version.
Transaction price for the Components reflects the net consideration to which we expect to be entitled. Transaction price is typically based on the contracted rates less and may include an estimate of claim denials and historical reimbursement experience by payor, which include current and future expectations regarding reimbursement rates and payor mix. variable consideration. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price only to the extent a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized is not probable of occurring when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved.
Source: 10-K text, Note 1 – Organization and Significant Accounting Policies, 10-K 0001093557-26-000027 vs 10-K text, Note 1 – Organization and Significant Accounting Policies, 10-K 0001093557-25-000036