tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

ETNEaton Corporation

Industrials · Industrial Machinery · NYSE
Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

2 reviews of ETN's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
2
latest letter 2024-04-08
Questions asked
6
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
0
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2023

2024-04-08 to 2024-05-10 · 4 questions · 2 letters from the SEC, 2 from the company
Review closed 2024-05-10
SegmentsResults discussion (MD&A)Non-GAAP measures
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations · General, page 77
SEC asked (1)
We note that you include various measures, such as 12-month rolling average of orders and backlog on an individual segment basis, in your Form 8-K earnings releases and investor presentations. Please tell us how management uses these measures in managing or monitoring your business and explain why you do present such measures in your Form 10-Q and Form 10-K filings, or revise as necessary. Refer to SEC Release No.
Rest of the question

33-10751.

ETN answered
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2023 Eaton Corporation plc acknowledges receipt of your comment letter dated April 8, 2024 with respect to the above referenced filing (the “Comment letter”). The Company respectfully requests an extension of an additional ten business days to respond to the Comment letter in order to permit sufficient time for an internal review of its responses at the appropriate levels in the Company. The Company hereby submits such request and confirms that it will respond to the comments set out in the Comment letter on or before May 6, 2024, which is ten business days from the date by which a response was originally requested.
Rest of the letter

Please add Olivier Leonetti, Chief Financial Officer, (Olivierleonetti@eaton.com) as the primary contact on this matter going forward. Megan Akst, Securities and Exchange Commission (AkstM@sec.gov)

One letter for all the questions, without numbered answers. Read the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2024-04-18: 10-Q filed 2024-04-30 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2023-10-31 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Business Segment Results of Operations, page 83
SEC asked (2)
You refer to various factors that impacted your segment operating margins, however, you do not quantify the impact of these factors. For example, you state the increase in operating margin for the Electrical Americas segment was due to higher sales volume and net price realization, which was partially offset by higher costs to support growth initiatives, and higher gains from the sale of non-production facilities in
Rest of the question

2022. Where a material change is due to two or more factors, including any offsetting factors, please revise throughout your results of operations to include a quantified discussion of each material factor impacting such change, and avoid using terms such as "primarily" in favor of specific quantification. Refer to Item 303(b) of Regulation S-K.

ETN answered

See the reply above.

In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2024-04-18: 10-Q filed 2024-04-30 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2023-10-31 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Form 8-K furnished on February 1, 2024 · Exhibit 99.1, page 1
SEC asked (3)
When providing a discussion and analysis of a non-GAAP measure, please ensure such disclosure is accompanied by a similar discussion and analysis of the corresponding GAAP measure with equal or greater prominence. For example, you disclose the percentage changes in adjusted earnings per share without providing similar information for the corresponding GAAP measure.
Rest of the question

Refer to Item 10(e)(1)(i) of Regulation S-K and Question 102.10(a) of the non-GAAP C&DIs.

ETN answered

See the reply above.

In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2024-04-18: 10-Q filed 2024-04-30 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2023-10-31 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

SEC letter of 2024-05-06 ↗ no reply letter on EDGAR
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations · General, page 77
SEC asked
We note your response to prior comment 1. Considering management use the measures noted in your response in managing your segments and they believe such information is useful to investors, please confirm that you will include a quantified discussion of such measures in future Form 10-Q and Form 10-K filings regardless of whether you include them in your earnings releases. Refer to SEC Release No. 33-10751.
ETN answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2024-05-06: 10-Q filed 2024-08-01 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2023-10-31 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: company letter, 2024-05-03, closing letter, 2024-05-10

Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2016

2017-12-20 to 2018-01-30 · 2 questions · 2 letters from the SEC, 2 from the company
Review closed 2018-01-30
Non-GAAP measuresResults discussion (MD&A)Segments
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results…, page 69 · Results of Operations, page 69
SEC asked
It appears to us that the non-GAAP financial measures you identify as "Operating earnings" and "Operating earnings per ordinary share" use titles that may be confusingly similar to GAAP financial measures and may be precluded by Item 10(e)(ii)(E) of Regulation S-K. We also note the title of your non-GAAP financial measure is confusingly similar to the title of your segment profitability measure.
Rest of the question

Please confirm to us that you will revise the titles of these non-GAAP financial measures in future filings to provide an appropriate description of each measure that complies with Item 10(e).

ETN answered
We have been using the non-GAAP financial measures “Operating Earnings” and “Operating Earnings per ordinary share” consistently since 2001. The only expenses we adjust for to arrive at Operating Earnings and Operating Earnings per ordinary share are removing acquisition integration charges and transaction costs, as our acquisition activity varies considerably year-to-year and these expenses are one-time costs specifically related to an acquisition.
Rest of the answer

For example, acquisition integration charges and transaction costs were $14 million in 2011; $222 million in 2012; $163 million in 2013; $154 million in 2014; $47 million in 2015; and $4 million in both 2016 and 2017. We believe removing the impact of these acquisition integration charges and transaction costs presents the best representation of ongoing results. Because we have used the terms “Operating Earnings” and “Operating Earnings per ordinary share” consistently for so long, we are concerned that any change to these terms will itself generate confusion among investors, particularly those that have followed Eaton’s stock over the long term. We believe that there is little risk of confusion by our use of “Operating Earnings” and “Operating Earnings per ordinary share” because we do not use any similarly titled measures (such as “Operating income”) in our financial statements. In addition, we provide a reconciliation of these amounts in the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Eaton’s Form 10-K. Accordingly, we respectfully request that you reconsider requiring a revision to these titles at this time.

* * * * *

The Company requests that the Staff contact the undersigned at 440-523-4336 with any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you for your assistance.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2018-01-11: 10-K filed 2018-02-28 ↗.

No earlier 10-K before the SEC's letter is in Tickdelta, so there is nothing to compare with.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results…, page 69 · Results of Operations, page 69
SEC asked
We have considered your response to prior comment one; however, we continue to believe that the non-GAAP financial measures you identify as “Operating earnings” and “Operating earnings per ordinary share” use titles that are confusingly similar to GAAP financial measures.
Rest of the question

As previously requested, please revise the titles of your non-GAAP financial measures in future filings to provide an appropriate description of each measure that complies with Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K.

ETN answered
In light of the Staff’s position, we propose to replace Operating earnings and Operating earnings per ordinary share with "Adjusted earnings" and "Adjusted earnings per ordinary share", respectively, in all future filings.

* * * * *

The Company requests that the Staff contact the undersigned at 440-523-4336 with any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you for your assistance. Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2018-01-29: 10-K filed 2018-02-28 ↗.

No earlier 10-K before the SEC's letter is in Tickdelta, so there is nothing to compare with.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2018-01-30

Other letters

Letters without questions

UPLOAD and CORRESP
1 other letter: notices that a filing will not be reviewed, requests to declare a registration effective, and the like
  • 2024-05-10 · ETN: letter to the SEC · Eaton Corporation plc · Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2023 · File...

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 14 letters filed since 2017-12-20. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →