tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

GENGen Digital

Technology · Software · Nasdaq
Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

1 review of GEN's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
1
latest letter 2024-01-04
Questions asked
5
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
0
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2023

2024-01-04 to 2024-01-26 · 5 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 0 from the company
Review closed 2024-01-26
RevenueResults discussion (MD&A)AcquisitionsNon-GAAP measures
SEC letter of 2024-01-04 ↗ no reply letter on EDGAR
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations · Results of Operations, page 30
SEC asked (1)
You attribute the increase in revenue to a $406 million increase in sales of your consumer security products and a $117 million increase in sales of your identity and protection products, which was offset by $113 million of foreign exchange headwinds. Please revise here to provide a quantified discussion of the impact of the Avast acquisition on your net revenues.
Rest of the question

In this regard, avoid using vague terms such as "primarily," as you have done on page 28, in favor specific quantification to more clearly describe the organic versus inorganic revenue growth. Similarly, revise to include a discussion of Avast's impact on your performance metrics such as direct customer count, ARPU and annual retention rate. For example, the decrease in your annual retention rate from 84% in fiscal 2022 to 76% in fiscal 2023 appears to be impacted by the Avast acquisition. Refer to Item 303(b) of Regulation S-K.

GEN answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2024-01-04: 10-Q filed 2024-02-05 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2023-11-07 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Performance Metrics, page 30
SEC asked (2)
We note that annual retention rate is defined as the number of direct customers who have more than one-year tenure as of the end of the most recently completed fiscal period divided by the total number of direct customers as of the end of the period one year ago. Please revise to clarify whether you compare the customer base as of a year ago to the same customers in the current period.
Rest of the question

If not, explain further how this measure represents retention of existing customers.

GEN answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2024-01-04: 10-Q filed 2024-02-05 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2023-11-07 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Note 1. Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies · Revenue recognition, page 47
SEC asked (3)
We note your disclosure that revenue from e-commerce partners is recognized on a gross basis before the deduction of partner incentive and fees. Please revise to disclose the nature of these arrangements, clarify whether you have direct billing arrangements with the end consumer, and describe the basis for your accounting treatment conclusion, if material.
Rest of the question

In your response, tell us the amount of e-commerce revenue for each period presented, including subsequent interim periods, and clarify whether ecommerce revenue is included in direct or partner revenue as disclosed in MD&A. Refer to ASC 606-10-50-12.

GEN answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2024-01-04: 10-Q filed 2024-02-05 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2023-11-07 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Note 1. Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies · Revenue recognition, page 47
SEC asked (4)
Please provide us with your customer retention rates for each quarter of the last two fiscal years and the current interim periods. Also, tell us your consideration to include this information in your Form 10-Q filings. In this regard, we note you present quarterly retention information in your investor presentations along with a discussion of changes in such metric since the Avast acquisition.
GEN answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2024-01-04: 10-Q filed 2024-02-05 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2023-11-07 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Exibit 99.01 Press Release, page 1
SEC asked (5)
We note that you highlight the non-GAAP year-over-year information in a different style (i.e. bullet points) than you do the GAAP information, which appears to place undue prominence on your non-GAAP measures. In addition, you discuss non-GAAP operating income in your highlights without discussing GAAP operating income with equal or greater prominence. Please revise.
Rest of the question

Refer to Question 102.10(a) of the Non-GAAP Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations.

GEN answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2024-01-04: 10-Q filed 2024-02-05 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2023-11-07 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2024-01-26

Other letters

Letters without questions

UPLOAD and CORRESP
3 other letters: notices that a filing will not be reviewed, requests to declare a registration effective, and the like

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 21 letters filed since 2014-09-11. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →