tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

JCIJohnson Controls

Industrials · HVAC Equipment · NYSE
Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

1 review of JCI's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
1
latest letter 2024-01-25
Questions asked
8
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
0
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2023

2024-01-25 to 2025-02-26 · 8 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 2 from the company
Review closed 2024-02-22
Non-GAAP measuresSegmentsLiquidity and cashRevenueResults discussion (MD&A)Debt
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations · Fiscal Year 2023 Compared to Fiscal Year 2022, page 32
SEC asked (1)
Please tell us whether you use any metrics to monitor your ability to retain customers, acquire new customers or expand sales to existing customers. For example, we note in your quarterly earnings slides that you highlight sites under long-term service agreements, and order growth for install and service on a consolidated and segmental basis.
Rest of the question

Tell us your consideration of disclosing these or other metrics for each period presented and any related trends that affect your revenues or results of operations. We refer you to Item 303(a) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release No. 33-10751.

JCI answered
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and had revised its filings to remove total segment EBITA from its previously filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for all quarterly periods during fiscal year 2024 and for the most recent quarter ended December 31, 2024. The revisions were inadvertently omitted from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024. The Company will not present the non-GAAP measure total segment EBITA in future periodic filings. Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2025-02-26: 10-Q filed 2025-05-07 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2023-08-02 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Segment Analysis, page 35
SEC asked (2)
We note that you present total segment EBITA, which is a non-GAAP measure and should be reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP measure. However, once reconciled it would appear that such measure may include adjustments that are inconsistent with the applicable non-GAAP guidance.
Rest of the question

In this regard, adjusting for “Corporate” expenses" appears to present a non-GAAP measure that excludes normal, recurring, cash operating expenses. Therefore, please revise to remove this measure from your periodic filings, Form 8-K earnings releases, and earnings presentations. Refer to Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K and Questions 100.01 and 104.04 of the non-GAAP C&DIs.

JCI answered
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and had revised its disclosures to only present a calculation of working capital as defined in the FASB Codification Master Glossary in its previously filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for all quarterly periods during fiscal year 2024 and for the most recent quarter ended December 31, 2024. The revisions were inadvertently omitted from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024.
Rest of the answer

The Company will only include a calculation of working capital as defined in the FASB Codification Master Glossary in its future periodic filings.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2025-02-26: 10-Q filed 2025-05-07 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2023-08-02 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Liquidity and Capital Resources · Working Capital, page 36
SEC asked (3)
We note your disclosure of working capital is not consistent with the definition of working capital in the FASB Codification Master Glossary and is therefore a non- GAAP measure. Please tell us how your presentation complies with Item 10(e)(1)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-K which prohibits excluding charges or liabilities that required or will require cash settlement from non-GAAP liquidity measures.
JCI answered
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and will include a presentation of operating cash flow conversion with equal or greater prominence when also presenting free cash flow and adjusted free cash flow conversion in its future earnings releases furnished on Form 8-K. Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2025-02-26: 10-Q filed 2025-05-07 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2023-08-02 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Capitalization, page 37
SEC asked (4)
We note you present the non-GAAP ratio, net debt as a % of total capitalization without presenting the ratio calculated using the most directly comparable GAAP measure(s) with equal or greater prominence. Please revise future filings accordingly. Refer to Question 102.10(a) of the Non-GAAP C&DIs.
JCI answered
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and will not include presentations of combined continuing and discontinued operations results in future filings.

We acknowledge that the Company is responsible for the accuracy of its disclosures, that the Commission is not foreclosed from taking action with respect to its filing and that the Company may not use the staff comments as a defense in any proceeding. Read in the reply ↗
Form 8-K furnished on December 12, 2023 · Exhibit 99.1, page 1
SEC asked (5)
We note that you discuss the percentage changes in non-GAAP EPS, adjusted net income, EBIT and EBIT margin on page 1 without providing a similar discussion of the percentage changes in the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Also, you disclose EBIT and adjusted EBIT margins without disclosing the comparable GAAP margin.
Rest of the question

Please revise to present and discuss the most directly comparable GAAP measure with equal or greater prominence as required by Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation S-K and Question 102.10(a) of the non-GAAP C&DIs.

JCI answered

No numbered answer found in the reply. Read the reply ↗

In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2025-02-26: 10-Q filed 2025-05-07 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2023-08-02 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Form 8-K furnished on December 12, 2023 · Exhibit 99.1, page 1
SEC asked (6)
Please revise to remove the “GAAP” header in the table on page 2 as total segment EBITA and EBIT are non-GAAP measures.
JCI answered

No numbered answer found in the reply. Read the reply ↗

In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2025-02-26: 10-Q filed 2025-05-07 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2023-08-02 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Form 8-K furnished on December 12, 2023 · Exhibit 99.1, page 1
SEC asked (7)
Please revise the reconciliations on page 15 to begin with the most directly comparable GAAP measure and reconcile to the non-GAAP. For example, your reconciliation should start with net income and reconcile down to EBIT and Adjusted EBIT. Refer to Question 102.10(b) of the Non-GAAP C&DIs.
JCI answered

No numbered answer found in the reply. Read the reply ↗

In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2025-02-26: 10-Q filed 2025-05-07 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2023-08-02 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Form 8-K furnished on December 12, 2023 · Exhibit 99.1, page 1
SEC asked (8)
Please revise the title of your free cash flow measure to adjusted free cash flow or a similar description as your calculation differs from the typical calculation of cash flows from operating activities less capital expenditures. Refer to Question 102.07 of the Non- GAAP C&DIs.
JCI answered

No numbered answer found in the reply. Read the reply ↗

In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2025-02-26: 10-Q filed 2025-05-07 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2023-08-02 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: request for more time, 2024-01-30, company letter, 2024-02-16, closing letter, 2024-02-22

Other letters

Letters without questions

UPLOAD and CORRESP
2 other letters: notices that a filing will not be reviewed, requests to declare a registration effective, and the like
  • 2018-04-03 · SEC: review completed · Johnson Controls International plc · Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30,...
  • 2018-03-19 · JCI: letter to the SEC · Commission letter dated February 23, 2018 · Commission File No. 001-13836 · Response...

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 15 letters filed since 2018-03-19. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →