tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

Consumer discretionary · Hotels · Nasdaq

MARMarriott International

Compare with peers → Embed
The 10-K against last year's

102 changes: 10 added, 15 removed, 74 reworded, 3 quiet changes

10-K Feb 10, 2026 vs Feb 11, 2025
Risk FactorsRedline ↓
14.3%
of the text changed · 7,910 words now
29.5%
of the text changed · 3,723 words now
Legal ProceedingsRedline ↓
32.8%
of the text changed · 989 words now
Accounting PoliciesRedline ↓
7.4%
of the text changed · 5,981 words now

10-K 0001048286-26-000007 (2026-02-10) vs 10-K 0001628280-25-004818 (2025-02-11)

The redline

The paragraph that changed most in each section

Marked against last year's 10-K: cut words struck through, new words highlighted and underlined.

Legal Proceedings 222 words changed in this paragraph; it is 57% similar to last year's version.
Following our announcement of the Data Security Incident, approximately 100 lawsuits were filed by consumers and others against us in U.S. federal, U.S. state and Canadian courts related to the incident. The plaintiffs in the cases that remain pending, these cases, who generally purport to represent various classes of consumers, generally claim to have been harmed by alleged actions and/or omissions by the Company in connection with the Data Security Incident and assert a variety of common law and statutory claims seeking monetary damages, injunctive relief, costs and attorneys’ fees, and other related relief. The active U.S. cases are were consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland (the “District Court”), pursuant to orders of the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the “MDL”). The District Court granted in part and denied in part class certification of various U.S. groups of consumers. In August 2023, On June 3, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (the “Fourth Circuit”) vacated reversed the District Court’s certification of a class certification decision because the District Court failed to first consider the effect of consumer plaintiffs, holding that a class-action waiver signed by all putative class members. On remand, after briefing, the District Court issued an order reinstating the same classes that had previously been certified. We promptly petitioned members was enforceable. Following the Fourth Circuit, Circuit’s reversal of class certification, some plaintiffs filed lawsuits in New York state court on an individual basis, alleging violations of New York statutory law and seeking leave to appeal that ruling. The Fourth Circuit granted that petition on January 18, 2024, oral argument was held on November 1, 2024, monetary damages, attorneys’ fees, and we await a decision. A case brought by other related relief. We have been engaged in mediation discussions with the City of Chicago (which is consolidated consumer plaintiffs in the MDL. We believe it is probable that we will incur losses in relation to the MDL proceeding) also remains pending. The Canadian cases have effectively been consolidated into a single case in and the province state court cases, and as of Ontario. We dispute the allegations in these lawsuits and are vigorously defending against such claims. December

Source: Item 3, via Note 7 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, 10-K 0001048286-26-000007 vs Item 3, via Note 7 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, 10-K 0001628280-25-004818

Risk Factors 221 words changed in this paragraph; it is 60% similar to last year's version.
An increase Changes in the use of Internet travel intermediaries to book way hotel reservations rooms are booked could adversely impact our business. Some of our hotel rooms are booked through Internet travel intermediaries such as Expedia.com, Priceline.com, Booking.com, Travelocity.com, Orbitz.com, and Trip.com. intermediaries. In addition to their focus on leisure travel, these intermediaries also provide offerings for corporate travel and group meetings. Internet search engines may also divert business away from our channels to intermediaries. Although our Best Rate Guarantee and Member Rate programs have helped limit guest preference shift to intermediaries and greatly reduced the ability of intermediaries to undercut the published rates at hotels in our system, intermediaries Intermediaries continue to use a variety of aggressive online marketing methods to attract guests, including the purchase by certain companies of trademarked online keywords such as “Marriott” from Internet search engines. Internet search engines such as Google, Bing, Yahoo, may also divert business away from our direct digital channels to intermediaries. Many intermediaries also operate their own loyalty programs designed to foster customer loyalty to their platforms, which could erode loyalty to our brands, offerings, and Baidu direct digital channels. Bookings through these intermediaries are more costly to steer guests toward their websites. Our business and profitability could be harmed to hotels in our system than bookings through our direct digital channels. To the extent that guest booking preference shifts from our direct digital channels to Internet travel intermediaries, diverting bookings away from our direct digital channels and increasing the overall cost of bookings for hotels in our system. system, our business and profitability could be harmed. In addition, the introduction of AI capabilities by existing and emerging travel intermediaries may change the way guests plan, book, and pay for travel, which may disrupt how our products and services are marketed and distributed, potentially eroding brand loyalty, increasing distribution costs, and negatively affecting our Loyalty Program, which could adversely impact our financial performance and our ability to grow our business. At the same time, if we are not able to negotiate new agreements on satisfactory terms when our existing contracts with intermediaries (which generally have two- to three-year terms) come up for renewal, our business and prospects could be negatively impacted in a number of ways, including by reducing bookings or making our brands less attractive to hotel owners.

Source: Item 1A, 10-K 0001048286-26-000007 vs Item 1A, 10-K 0001628280-25-004818

MD&A 126 words changed in this paragraph; it is 54% similar to last year's version.
Under our asset-light business model and consistent with our focus on franchising, management, and licensing, we own or lease very few of our lodging properties. Under our hotel franchising arrangements, we generally receive an initial application fee and continuing royalty fees, which are typically based on a percentage of room revenues, plus for certain brands, a percentage of food and beverage revenues. Terms of our management agreements vary, but we earn a management fee that is typically composed of a base management fee, which is a percentage of the revenues of the hotel, and an incentive management fee, which is based on the profits of the hotel. In many cases (particularly in our U.S. & Canada, Europe, and CALA regions), incentive management fees are subject to a specified owner return. We also have license and other agreements with third parties for certain offerings, such as for our timeshare properties, MGM Collection with Marriott Bonvoy, Design Hotels, and The Ritz-Carlton Yacht Collection, under which we receive royalty fees and certain other fees. Additionally, we earn fees for other uses of our intellectual property, including primarily co-branded credit card fees, as well as residential branding fees and certain other licensing fees.

Source: Item 7, 10-K 0001048286-26-000007 vs Item 7, 10-K 0001628280-25-004818

Accounting Policies 114 words changed in this paragraph; it is 76% similar to last year's version.
Hotel owners and certain other counterparties participate in certain centralized programs and services, such as marketing, sales, reservations, and insurance programs, which we operate for their benefit. We do not operate these programs and services to generate a profit over the long term, and accordingly, when we recover the costs that we incur for these programs and services from our hotel owners and other counterparties counterparties, we do not seek a mark-up. The amounts we charge for these programs and services are generally a combination of fixed fees and variable fees based on sales or other metrics and are payable on a monthly basis. We generally recognize revenue within the “Cost reimbursement revenue” caption of our Income Statements when the amounts may be billed to hotel owners and other counterparties, and counterparties. Amounts we charge for system implementations are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the franchise or management agreement. We recognize expenses within the “Reimbursed expenses” caption as they are incurred. This pattern of recognition results in timing differences between the costs incurred for centralized programs and services and the related reimbursement in our operating and net income. Over the long term, these programs and services are not designed to impact our economics, either positively or negatively. In addition, we present in the “Reimbursed expenses” caption of our Income Statements spending funded by the proceeds ($664 million, $425 million after-tax) from the 2017 sale of our interest in Avendra LLC, which we committed would be used for the benefit of hotels in our system. Such spending totaled less than $1 million in 2024, $161 million ($120 million after-tax) in 2023, and $69 million ($52 million after-tax) in 2022. As of December 31, 2024, we have completed our spending funded by the Avendra sale proceeds.

Source: Item 8, Note 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, 10-K 0001048286-26-000007 vs Item 8, Note 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, 10-K 0001628280-25-004818

Every change, by type

Sentences and paragraphs added, removed or reworded

Sentences and paragraphs of MAR's Risk Factors and MD&A, 10-K 2026-02-10 against 10-K 2025-02-11. Each links to the text at sec.gov.

AddedRisk Factors
(including investigations and publicity resulting from actual or alleged failures), or actions we take to comply with such requirements or investigations could have significant adverse effects on our results of operations, reputation, or ability to grow our business.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-10 at sec.gov ↗

AddedRisk Factors
Insurance coverage designed to limit our exposure to losses such as those related to the Data Security Incident is costly and may not be sufficient or available to cover all of our expenses or other losses (including payments, fines, or penalties

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-10 at sec.gov ↗

AddedRisk Factors
resulting from legal proceedings or investigations) related to the Data Security Incident, and certain expenses by their nature (such as, for example, expenses related to enhancing our data privacy and information security programs) are not covered by our insurance program.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-10 at sec.gov ↗

AddedRisk Factors
alleged noncompliance. In addition, uncertainty around cross-border data transfers, including from the U.S., may require us to restrict certain data transfers, cease doing business with certain third parties, or change how data flows throughout our business, any of which could materially impact our operations.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-10 at sec.gov ↗

AddedMD&A
In the U.S. & Canada, RevPAR increased 0.7 percent in 2025, reflecting strong demand at our luxury hotels, partially offset by softer demand at our select service hotels, which were impacted by weaker business transient demand, in part due to declines in government travel.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-10 at sec.gov ↗

AddedMD&A
In our International regions, RevPAR increased 5.1 percent in 2025, reflecting higher demand in most countries across the APEC, EMEA, and CALA regions. In Greater China, RevPAR increased 0.4 percent, reflecting softness in macro-economic conditions during the year.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-10 at sec.gov ↗

AddedMD&A
Owned, leased, and other revenue, net of owned, leased, and other expense, decreased primarily due to expenses related to the termination of our licensing agreement with Sonder Holdings Inc. ($23 million), partially offset by stronger results at our owned and leased properties in the U.S. & Canada, which included the results from the Sheraton Grand Chicago hotel that we acquired in the fourth quarter of the prior year.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-10 at sec.gov ↗

AddedMD&A
Additionally, U.S. & Canada segment profit reflected higher owned, leased, and other revenue, net of owned, leased, and other expense ($56 million), partially offset by lower cost reimbursement revenue, net of reimbursed expenses ($34 million). Owned, leased, and other revenue, net of owned, leased, and other expense increased primarily due to stronger results at our owned and leased properties, which included the results from the Sheraton Grand Chicago hotel that we acquired in the fourth quarter of the prior year.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-10 at sec.gov ↗

Show the other 2
AddedMD&A
•In connection with the citizenM brand acquisition discussed in Note 3, we may pay earn-out payments up to $110 million to citizenM Holding BV and certain of its affiliates based on the future growth of the brand over a specified, multi-year timeframe. Earn-out payments would not begin until the fourth year following closing of the transaction.

Read it in 10-K 2026-02-10 at sec.gov ↗

Next Related parties →