tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

MTDMettler Toledo

Health care · Lab Instruments · NYSE
Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

1 review of MTD's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
1
latest letter 2018-05-17
Questions asked
3
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
0
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017

2018-05-17 to 2018-06-08 · 3 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2018-06-08
Non-GAAP measuresIncome taxesLiquidity and cash
Operations · Interest expense and taxes, page 35
SEC asked (1)
We note that you presented an annual effective tax rate for 2017 that excludes the onetime charge associated with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act but you did not identify the measure as non-GAAP or include any of the disclosures required by Item 10(e)(1)(i) of Regulation S-K. Please revise your presentation in future filings to fully comply with that guidance.
MTD answered
We acknowledge the Staff's comments and will revise our presentation to eliminate the use of this non-GAAP measure in future filings. Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2018-05-30: 10-Q filed 2018-07-27 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2018-05-04 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Exhibit 99.1
SEC asked (2)
We note you present non-GAAP measures more prominently than the directly comparable GAAP measures by including the identification of only non-GAAP adjusted EPS in the headline, discussing non-GAAP local currency sales growth before GAAP sales growth, and discussing destination local currency sales growth and adjusted operating income without the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
Rest of the question

In addition, you present the forward looking non-GAAP measures local currency sales growth and Adjusted EPS without providing the reconciliation of the amounts to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure or the statement that providing such reconciliation requires unreasonable efforts. Refer to Question 102.10 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures and please revise your presentation in future earnings releases to comply with that guidance.

MTD answered
We acknowledge the Staff's comments and will ensure that our presentation in future earnings releases complies with the guidance in Question 102.10 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures. Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2018-05-30: 10-Q filed 2018-07-27 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2018-05-04 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Exhibit 99.1
SEC asked (3)
Your computation of free cash flow differs from the typical calculation, which is cash flows from operating activities as presented in the statement of cash flows under GAAP less capital expenditures by excluding restructuring payments. Please revise the title of this non-GAAP measure so it is not confused with free cash flow as typically calculated.
Rest of the question

See Question 102.07 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

MTD answered
We acknowledge the Staff's comment and will refer to "adjusted free cash flow" in future presentations.

Mettler-Toledo acknowledges that it is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of disclosure in its filings, notwithstanding any review, comments, action or absence of action by the staff. Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2018-05-30: 10-Q filed 2018-07-27 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2018-05-04 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2018-06-08

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 6 letters filed since 2016-03-23. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →