tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

SNASnap-on

Industrials · Tools & Hardware · NYSE
Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

1 review of SNA's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
1
latest letter 2015-07-23
Questions asked
1
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
0
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K

2015-07-23 to 2015-08-13 · 1 question · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2015-08-13
SegmentsResults discussion (MD&A)
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, page
SEC asked
We note in your Management Overview and your Results of Operations that you often attribute changes in your results to a combination of several different factors. We further note that certain factors attributed to your results are vague.
Rest of the question

For example, on page 26 you attribute the organic sales increase in your Commercial and Industrial Group to higher sales to customers in “critical industries” and in the segment’s European-based hand tools business. We further note that you refer to “rapid continuous improvement” or “RCI” in your discussion and analysis of your results. However, you do not provide an explanation as to what you mean by “critical industries” or what your rapid continuous improvement initiative entails. When you list multiple factors that contributed to changes in your results, in future filings please quantify, if possible, the impact of each material factor that you discuss and explain each factor, where necessary, to provide your readers with better insight into the underlying reasons behind the changes in your results.

SNA answered
The company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and confirms that its future filings, including the company’s third quarter 2015 Form 10-Q, will more fully define and quantify, where practicable, the impact of each material factor discussed and will further expand disclosures and descriptions, where necessary, to provide readers with better insight into the underlying reasons behind the changes in our results. Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2015-07-30: 10-Q filed 2015-10-22 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2015-07-23 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2015-08-13

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 8 letters filed since 2015-07-23. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →