Marked against last year's 10-K:
cut words struck through, new words highlighted and underlined.
Risk Factors 166 words changed in this paragraph; it is 57% similar to last year's version.
We have previously announced certain defined sustainability commitments with a goal of achieving these commitments by 2030. We also periodically announce new initiatives and product innovations that further our sustainability commitments. We are on track with our climate commitment to offer a full line of next generation products by 2030 without compromising safety or energy efficiency. Additionally, in 2019, we announced our 2030 commitment which targets reducing one gigaton – one billion metric tons – of carbon emissions (CO2e) from our customers' footprint by 2030. While we are committed to pursuing these sustainability objectives, our ability to achieve our sustainability objectives is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including increased operation operating costs and future changes in regulation, and there can be no assurance that we will successfully achieve our commitments. Failure commitments or that any future investments we make in furtherance of achieving our sustainability targets and goals will meet investor expectations or any future legal requirements regarding sustainability performance. If we are unable to meet these commitments our targets and goals, it could result in reputational and other harm to our company. Changes company, adverse publicity and reaction from investors, activist groups and other stakeholders, which could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. Stakeholders are increasingly scrutinizing sustainability practices, and stakeholders' expectations regarding climate risk management these practices are diverse and practices rapidly changing. Furthermore, many jurisdictions where we operate have enacted or are in the process of enacting legislation regarding sustainability reporting, monitoring, and other requirements. Failure to meet these evolving legal requirements may result in higher regulatory, compliance risks and costs. subject us to fines, penalties, or other legal obligations.
Source: Item 1A, 10-K 0001628280-26-005731 vs Item 1A, 10-K 0001466258-25-000039
MD&A 143 words changed in this paragraph; it is 50% similar to last year's version.
On Certain individual claimants and the ACC filed Motions to dismiss the bankruptcy proceedings on April 6, 2023 and May 15, 2023, respectively (the Motions to Dismiss). The Bankruptcy Court denied the Motions to Dismiss, and the District Court and the Fourth Circuit declined to review the Bankruptcy Court's ruling. In addition, on January 23, 2023, an individual claimant filed a motion to lift the automatic order stay imposed by the Bankruptcy Code to pursue its asbestos suit against Aldrich and Murray notwithstanding the Chapter 11 cases (the Stay Relief Motion). Aldrich and Murray, the FCR, and certain non-debtor affiliates each opposed the Stay Relief Motion. The Bankruptcy Court denied the Stay Relief Motion after holding a hearing on March 30, 2023. The Bankruptcy Court entered an order memorializing its March oral ruling on November 13, 2024. Motion. The individual claimant filed a notice with the Bankruptcy Court appealing the order denying the Stay Relief Motion to the U.S. District Court on November 27, 2024. for the Western District of North Carolina (the District Court). The District Court has entered an order staying all deadlines in the appeal of the order denying the Stay Relief Motion pending the outcome of a separate appeal before the Fourth Circuit in another bankruptcy case pending in the Bankruptcy Court.
Source: Item 7, 10-K 0001628280-26-005731 vs Item 7, 10-K 0001466258-25-000039
Accounting Policies 101 words changed in this paragraph; it is 54% similar to last year's version.
In November 2024, September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, "Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40)" 2025-06, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software: Targeted Improvements to the accounting for Internal-Use Software" (ASU 2024-03) 2025-06) which requires additional disaggregated disclosures in modernizes accounting guidance for the notes costs to financial statements develop software for certain categories internal use, aligning the various stages of expenses that are included on the face of the income statement. software development with current software development methods. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 2027 and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. within those annual reporting periods. ASU 2025-06 can be applied prospectively, retrospectively, or with a modified transition approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not currently expect to adopt this ASU before the required effective date. The Company is evaluating the impact of the standard and does not anticipate a material impact on its consolidated financial statement disclosures. statements.
Source: 10-K text, Note 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, 10-K 0001628280-26-005731 vs 10-K text, Note 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, 10-K 0001466258-25-000039
Legal Proceedings 101 words changed in this paragraph; it is 70% similar to last year's version.
On June 18, 2020, 2020 (the Petition Date), Aldrich and Murray filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina (the Bankruptcy Court) to resolve equitably and permanently all current and future asbestos related claims in a manner beneficial to claimants and to Aldrich and Murray. As a result of the Chapter 11 filings, all asbestos-related lawsuits against Aldrich and Murray have been stayed due to the imposition of a statutory automatic stay applicable in Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases. In addition, at the request of Aldrich and Murray, the Bankruptcy Court has entered an order temporarily staying all asbestos-related claims against the each of 200 Park, Inc. (200 Park), ClimateLabs LLC (ClimateLabs), and Trane Companies Technologies plc and its other subsidiaries (the Trane Companies) that relate to claims against Aldrich or Murray (except for asbestos-related claims for which the exclusive remedy is provided under workers' compensation statutes or similar laws). On August 23, 2021, the Bankruptcy Court entered its findings of facts and conclusions of law and order declaring that the automatic stay applies to certain asbestos related claims against the Trane Companies and enjoining such actions. As a result, all asbestos-related lawsuits against Aldrich, Murray and the Trane Companies remain stayed.
Source: Item 3, via Note 20 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, 10-K 0001628280-26-005731 vs Item 3, via Note 20 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, 10-K 0001466258-25-000039