tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

UPSUnited Parcel Service

Industrials · Trucking & Delivery · NYSE
Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

1 review of UPS's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
1
latest letter 2023-10-23
Questions asked
2
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
0
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Schedule 14A

2023-10-23 to 2023-12-15 · 2 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2023-12-15
Executive payNon-GAAP measures
Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed March 20, 2023 · Pay versus Performance, page 63
SEC asked (1)
We note that you have included Adjusted Operating Profit, a non-GAAP measure, as your Company-Selected Measure pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 402(v)(2)(vi). Please provide disclosure showing how this number is calculated from your audited financial statements, as required by Regulation S-K Item 402(v)(2)(vi). Incorporation by reference to a separate filing will not satisfy this disclosure requirement.
UPS answered
The Company undertakes, in future filings, to provide disclosure showing how a non-GAAP Company-Selected Measure pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 402(v)(2)(vi) is calculated from the Company’s financial statements. Read in the reply ↗
Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed March 20, 2023 · Pay versus Performance, page 63
SEC asked (2)
Refer to the tables titled "CEO Equity Component of CAP" and "Average Other NEOs Equity Component of CAP." In is unclear what amounts are reflected in the columns titled "Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year." Specifically, equity awards granted in prior years that vest during the relevant year should be valued as the difference between the fair value as
Rest of the question

of the end of the prior fiscal year and the vesting date, and not a "year over year" change in value. Please ensure that your table headings reflect accurately the amounts used to calculate compensation actually paid. Refer to Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K.

UPS answered
The Company undertakes, in future filings, to ensure that table headings reflect accurately the amounts used to calculate compensation actually paid in accordance with Item 402(v)(2)(iii)(C)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K. Read in the reply ↗

Also in this review: closing letter, 2023-12-15

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 18 letters filed since 2016-05-19. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →