tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

URIUnited Rentals

Industrials · Equipment Rental · NYSE
Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

2 reviews of URI's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
2
latest letter 2023-12-04
Questions asked
2
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
0
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K

2023-12-04 to 2023-12-12 · 1 question · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2023-12-12
Non-GAAP measuresResults discussion (MD&A)
Summary of Fourth Quarter 2022 Financial Results · Used Equipment Sales
SEC asked
You disclose what appears to be a non-GAAP financial measure, used equipment adjusted gross margin. Please revise to reconcile this measure to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, either in a table or by quantifying the adjustment in the related footnote. Refer to Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K.
URI answered
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and will revise its future filings to identify used equipment adjusted gross margin as a non-GAAP financial measure (with a statement disclosing the reasons why the Company’s management believes that the presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure provides useful information to investors regarding the Company’s results of operations), and to quantify the fair value mark-up of acquired fleet adjustment, which represents the only difference between the GAAP used equipment gross margin and the used equipment adjusted gross margin, in the related
Rest of the answer

footnote.

****

In connection with our response to the Staff’s comment, we acknowledge that the Company and its management are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of our disclosures, notwithstanding any review, comments, action or absence of action by the Staff.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2023-12-07: 10-K filed 2024-01-24 ↗, against the 10-K filed 2023-01-25 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2023-12-12

Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2019

2020-05-05 to 2020-05-28 · 1 question · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2020-05-28
Non-GAAP measures
Financial Overview · EBITDA GAAP Reconciliations, page 24
SEC asked
On page 26 you disclose margins for "EBITDA" and "adjusted EBITDA." Please present with equal or greater prominence the comparable margins computed on a GAAP basis wherever these non-GAAP margins are presented. Refer to Item 10(e)(1)(i)(A) of
URI answered
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and will provide the requested disclosures in future filings. Specifically, the Company will present net income margin with equal or greater prominence to adjusted EBITDA margin in our reconciliation from net income to adjusted EBITDA. Further, we will disclose, with equal or greater prominence, a discussion and analysis of net income margin along with such discussion and analysis of adjusted EBITDA margin.
Rest of the answer

Separately, we will no longer provide EBITDA margin in our future filings, as we believe adjusted EBITDA margin is the non-GAAP measure that is more relevant to investors. EBITDA, as a subtotal, will continue to be presented in our reconciliation from net income to adjusted EBITDA.

****

In addition, in connection with our response to your comment, the Company acknowledges that it is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its filings; Staff comments, or changes to our disclosure in response to Staff comments, do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and the Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2020-05-15: 10-Q filed 2020-07-29 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2020-04-29 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2020-05-28

Other letters

Letters without questions

UPLOAD and CORRESP
1 other letter: notices that a filing will not be reviewed, requests to declare a registration effective, and the like

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 10 letters filed since 2016-03-16. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →