Climate and weather

By sector

Sector is the SEC's industry description of the company. Each count opens that sector's quotes below.

268 paragraphs · Investment Advice show all sectors

Conversely, anti-ESG sentiment has gained momentum across the U.S., with a growing number of states, federal agencies, the executive branch and Congress having enacted or proposed or indicated an intent to pursue “anti-ESG” policies, legislation, issued related legal opinions and engaged in related investigation and litigation. For example: (i) boycott bills target financial institutions that “boycott” or “discriminate against” companies in certain industries (e.g., energy and mining) and prohibit state entities from doing business with such institutions and/or investing the state’s assets (including pension plan assets) through such institutions; and (ii) ESG investment prohibitions require that state entities or managers/administrators of state investments make investments based solely on pecuniary factors without consideration of ESG factors. If investors subject to such legislation viewed our funds or responsible investing or ESG practices, including our climate-related goals and commitments, as being in contradiction of such “anti-ESG” policies, legislation or legal opinions, such investors may not invest in our funds, our ability to maintain the size of our funds could be impaired, and it could negatively affect results of our operations, cash flow or the price of our common stock. Further, asset managers have been subject to recent scrutiny related to ESG-focused industry working groups, initiatives and associations, including organizations advancing action to address ESG matters, climate change or climate-related risk. In addition, some advocacy groups and federal and state officials have asserted that the Supreme Court’s decision striking down race-based affirmative action in higher education in June 2023 should be analogized to private employment matters and private contract matters. Several media campaigns and cases alleging discrimination based on such arguments have been initiated since the decision, with scrutiny of certain corporate DEI practices increasing. In January 2025, the new Presidential Administration signed a number of Executive Orders focused on DEI, which

Read in the 10-K filed Feb 27, 2025 ↗

In March 2024, the SEC adopted final rules intended to enhance and standardize climate-related disclosures; however these rules are stayed pending the outcome of consolidated legal challenges in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. At the state level, in October 2023, California enacted legislation that will ultimately require certain companies that do business in California to publicly disclose their Scopes 1, 2, and 3 greenhouse gas emissions, with third party assurance of such data, and issue public reports on their climate-related financial risk and related mitigation measures.

Read in the 10-K filed Feb 27, 2025 ↗

Climate change, climate change-related regulation and other efforts to reduce climate change and address sustainability concerns could adversely affect our business.

Read in the 10-K filed Feb 27, 2025 ↗

businesses and assets may be subject to the risk of environmental liabilities, contingent liabilities upon disposition of assets, casualty or condemnations losses, energy and supply shortages, natural disasters, climate change related risks (including climate-related

Read in the 10-K filed Feb 28, 2025 ↗

Ownership of real assets in our funds or vehicles may increase our risk of direct and/or indirect liability under environmental laws that impose, regardless of fault, joint and several liability for the cost of remediating contamination and compensation for damages. In addition, changes in environmental laws or regulations (including climate change initiatives) or the environmental condition of an investment may create liabilities that did not exist at the time of acquisition. Even in cases where we are indemnified by a seller against liabilities arising out of violations of environmental laws and regulations, there can be no assurance as to the financial viability of the seller to satisfy such indemnities or our ability to achieve enforcement of such indemnities. See “—Climate change, climate and sustainability-related

Read in the 10-K filed Feb 28, 2025 ↗

Geopolitical developments and other local and global events outside of our control can materially and adversely impact various aspects of KKR and its businesses. We are a global financial institution with operations, investors and investments located in many countries around the world, which are not immune to geopolitical developments. Geopolitical developments and other local and global events outside of our control, including trade conflict, sanctions (reciprocal or unilateral), restrictions on foreign direct investment, trade barriers, civil unrest, national and international security events (including the outbreak of war, terrorist acts or other hostilities), can, and occasionally do, materially and adversely impact our ability to conduct our investment management and insurance businesses, as well as our portfolio companies and other investments. These risks have increased in both scale and complexity due to intensifying geopolitical competition and conflicts, including the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine and unrest in the Middle East, heightened geopolitical competition between China and other major world economies, heightened levels of political populism leading to regulatory volatility, and increased attention to global threats, including climate change. We have a number of offices located in multiple countries and regions around the world, including China, South Korea, Japan, India, Australia, the United Kingdom, the European Union, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and elsewhere, and we seek investors from various countries throughout the world for our investment products and, to a lesser extent, our insurance business’ products. In particular, our investment strategies target opportunities globally, including across the Americas, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the Middle East. Political instability and extremism, conflict, and civil unrest in any region where we have material business operations or investments may have a material adverse effect on us. Any escalation in an actual or perceived trade war or barriers to investment between the U.S. and other countries or regions could chill or limit business opportunities, and otherwise negatively affect our investment management and insurance businesses. In addition, intensifying rivalries and conflicts in in the Asia-Pacific, Middle East, Europe and globally have created new complexities in the international business environment, including through the imposition of sanctions, national security-motivated regulatory changes, and protectionist policies by certain countries. Occurrence of war or hostilities involving a country in which we have investments, investors, insurance counterparties or employees could adversely affect our business.

Read in the 10-K filed Feb 28, 2025 ↗

Natural disasters or catastrophes, such as public health crises and extreme weather could have an adverse impact on our ability to conduct our investment management and insurance businesses. Such disasters and catastrophes could limit or even materially prohibit our ability to conduct any investment activities in certain locations. In addition, claims arising from the occurrence of such events could have an adverse effect on our insurance activities, in particular with respect to lapses and surrenders of existing policies, as well as sales of new policies. Public health crises, pandemics and epidemics, such as those caused by new strains of viruses, may occur from time to time, which could directly and indirectly impact us in material respects that we are unable to predict or control. In addition, we may be materially and adversely affected as a result of many related factors outside our control, including the effectiveness of governmental responses to a public health crisis, pandemic or epidemic. Actions taken in response may contribute to significant volatility in the financial markets, resulting in increased volatility in equity prices (including our common stock), material interest rate changes, supply chain disruptions, such as simultaneous supply and demand shock to global, regional and national economies, and an increase in inflationary pressures.

Read in the 10-K filed Feb 28, 2025 ↗

Potential changes in climatic conditions, together with the response or failure to respond to these changes, could precipitate natural disasters. While the precise future effects of climate change are unknown, it is possible that climate change could affect precipitation levels, droughts, wildfires, agricultural production, wind levels, annual sunshine, sea levels and the severity and frequency of storms and other severe weather events. These events and the disruptions that they cause, alone or in combination, also have the potential to strain or deplete infrastructure and response capabilities generally, and to increase costs, including costs of insurance. See also "—Risks Related to Our Investment Activities—Our investments in real assets such as real estate, infrastructure and energy may expose us to increased risks and liabilities." We and our investments also face climate transition risks that could arise, for example, from climate-related legislation and policy developments (both domestically and internationally), and business trends and changes in consumer behavior related to climate change and technology (such as the process of transitioning to a lower-carbon economy). New climate-related regulations or interpretations of existing laws may result in enhanced disclosure or other compliance obligations, which could negatively affect our and our investment vehicles’ investments and materially increase the regulatory burden and cost of compliance.

Read in the 10-K filed Feb 28, 2025 ↗

Some investors in our investment vehicles, stockholders, regulators and other stakeholders are increasingly focused on sustainability matters, such as climate change and environmental stewardship, human rights, support for local communities, corporate governance and transparency, or other environmental- or social-related areas. Certain investors and other stakeholder groups have also increased their activism and scrutiny of asset managers’ approaches to considering sustainability matters as part of their investment management decision-making, including by urging alternative asset managers to take (or refrain from taking) certain actions that could adversely impact the value of an investment and at times have conditioned future capital commitments on such actions. Further, a growing number of states having enacted or proposed policies, legislation, issued related legal opinions and engaged in related litigation regarding sustainability matters. Increased focus and activism related to sustainability matters may constrain our capital deployment opportunities. Similarly, current and prospective stockholders and fund investors, may use third-party benchmarks to measure our responsible investment practices and to decide whether to make an investment, and failure to meet their standards may materially and adversely affect us. There can be no assurance that we will be able to accomplish any sustainability-related goals or commitments that we have announced or may announce in the future, as such statements are, or reflect, estimates, aspirations and/or expectations only at the time of announcement. More broadly, there can be no assurance that our responsible investment policies and procedures will remain unchanged because we continuously review our approach to these issues. Thus, such policies and procedures could change, even materially, or may not be applied to a particular investment. KKR may determine at any time that it is not feasible or practical to implement or complete certain of its sustainability-related initiatives, policies, and procedures based on considerations relating to particular business, regulatory, policy, geopolitics, cost, timing, or other considerations. Growing interest on the part of investors and regulators in sustainability factors and increased demand for, and scrutiny of, asset managers' sustainability-related disclosure, have also increased the risk that asset managers could be perceived as, or accused of, making inaccurate or misleading statements regarding these matters. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material and adverse impact on us, including on our reputation.

Read in the 10-K filed Feb 28, 2025 ↗