tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

APTVAptiv

Consumer discretionary · Auto Parts · NYSE
Employees
140,000
Headquarters
Schaffhausen, V8
CEO
Kevin P. Clark
Next results
around Feb 1, 2027
Compare with peers → Embed

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. Below: what the staff asked APTV, and the company's answer to each question, quoted from the letters. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Schedule 14A

2024-10-22 to 2024-10-24 · 1 question · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2024-10-24
Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed October 15, 2024 · General
SEC asked
We note your disclosure that the New Aptiv Shares will be issued pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act. Please provide the legal analysis you used in determining the availability of the exemption. Please also revise your disclosure where appropriate in the proxy statement to discuss the exemption in further detail. Refer to Staff Legal Bulletin No. 3A.
APTV answered
The issuance of the New Aptiv

Shares in the Scheme will satisfy each of the required elements of the exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act, as discussed below with reference to each of the elements described in Staff Legal Bulletin

No. 3A.

(i) The securities must be issued in exchange for securities, claims, or property interests.

Upon consummation of the Scheme on the Effective Date, the New Aptiv Shares will be issued in exchange for the Company Shares.
Rest of the answer

There will be no exchange for cash or consideration other than the shares.

(ii) A court or authorized governmental entity must approve the fairness of the terms and conditions of the exchange.

Under Part 18A of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 (as amended, modified, or re-enacted from time to time, the “Companies Law”), the Scheme must by sanctioned by the Royal Court of Jersey (the “Court”) following a hearing of the Court to sanction the Scheme

(the “Court Hearing”). In determining whether to exercise its discretion and sanction the Scheme, the Court will determine, among other things, whether the Scheme is fair to Aptiv PLC’s ordinary shareholders.

(iii) The reviewing court or authorized governmental entity must (a) find, before approving the transaction, that the terms and conditions of the exchange are fair to those to whom securities will be issued and (b) be advised before the hearing that the issuer will rely on the

Section 3(a)(10) exemption based on the court’s or authorized governmental entity’s approval of the transaction.

At the Court Hearing, the Court will consider, among other things, the fairness of the Scheme to Aptiv PLC’s ordinary shareholders. Carey

Olsen Jersey LLP (“Carey Olsen”), the Company’s Jersey counsel, has informed the Company that, prior to sanctioning the Scheme, the Court must be satisfied that the Scheme is fair to Aptiv PLC’s ordinary shareholders. In particular, the Scheme must be an arrangement that an intelligent and honest man, a member of the class concerned and acting in respect of his interest, might reasonably approve.

Carey Olsen has confirmed that it will advise the Court before and during the Court Hearing that the Company will rely on the

Section 3(a)(10) exemption based on the Court’s approval of the Scheme.

(iv) The court or authorized governmental entity must hold a hearing before approving the fairness of the terms and conditions of the transaction.

As described above, the

Court will hold the Court Hearing prior to issuing the order to sanction the Scheme (the “Sanction Order”).

(v) A governmental entity must be expressly authorized by law to hold the hearing, although it is not necessary that the law require the hearing.

The Court Hearing will be held pursuant to Part 18A of the Companies Law, which authorizes the Court to hold the

Court Hearing.

(vi) The fairness hearing must be open to everyone to whom securities would be issued in the proposed exchange.

Carey Olsen has informed the Company that all shareholders of Aptiv PLC are entitled to attend and be heard at the Court

Hearing, either in person or through a Jersey advocate, to support or oppose the Scheme. The Court has wide discretion to hear from interested parties.

(vii) Adequate notice must be given to everyone to whom securities would be issued in the proposed exchange.

Information material to the decision of Aptiv PLC shareholders to vote for or against the proposal to approve the Scheme will be mailed to shareholders of Aptiv PLC in such a manner as to ensure that such parties receive timely and effective notice. In particular, the notice of the Court Meeting and the contents of the proxy statement to be mailed to shareholders of Aptiv PLC for the purposes of their participation in the Court Meeting will be provided in accordance with the orders of the Court, a draft of which is included as Annex B to the Proxy Statement. In addition, the Company will disclose the date of the Court

Hearing by public announcement and SEC filing after it has been scheduled and not less than 21 days before the Court Hearing.

(viii) There cannot be any improper impediments to the appearance at the hearing by those to whom securities would be issued in the proposed exchange.

There will be no improper impediments to the appearance of any shareholder of Aptiv PLC at the Court Hearing. As noted above, shareholders of Aptiv PLC will receive adequate notice of the Court Meeting in accordance with the directions of the Court, and all shareholders of Aptiv PLC are entitled to attend and be heard at the Court Hearing.

As the Staff has noted, “the Section 3(a)(10) exemption is available without any action by the Division or the Commission” Staff Legal Bulletin No. 3A (published October 20, 1999). Nonetheless, we note that the Jersey statutory structure for a scheme of arrangement is substantively identical to that of England, and the Division of Corporation Finance has previously granted no-action relief confirming that the English structure satisfies Section 3(a)(10). See Xyratex Group Limited (available May 29,

2002). Numerous other registrants have relied upon the Jersey scheme of arrangement to satisfy Section 3(a)(10). See Delphi Technologies PLC Definitive Proxy Statement filed on Schedule 14A (filed May 26, 2020) and

Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement filed on Schedule 14A (filed September 13, 2017).

We will include updated disclosure in the definitive proxy statement to the following effect (changes indicated by underlines).

The issuance of New Aptiv Shares to Aptiv PLC’s shareholders in connection with the Transaction will not be registered under the Securities Act. Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act exempts securities issued in exchange for one or more outstanding securities from the general requirement of registration where the terms and conditions of the issuance and exchange of such securities have been approved by any court of competent jurisdiction, after a hearing upon the fairness of the terms and conditions of the issuance and exchange at which all persons to whom such securities will be issued have a right to appear and to whom adequate notice of the hearing has been given. The issuance of the New Aptiv Shares in the Scheme will fall within the exemption provided by Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act: (i) the New Aptiv Shares will be exchanged for the Company Shares; (ii) in determining whether it is appropriate to sanction the Scheme, the Court will consider at the Court Hearing whether the terms and conditions of the Scheme are fair to Aptiv PLC’s ordinary shareholders; (iii) the

Company will advise the Court of the Company’s intent to rely on the Section 3(a)(10) exemption based on the Court’s sanction of the Scheme; (iv) the Court will hold the

Court Hearing pursuant to Part 18A of the Companies Law prior to sanctioning the Scheme and (v) all shareholders of Aptiv PLC will be given adequate notice of, and are entitled to attend and be heard at, the Court

Hearing, either in person or through a Jersey advocate, to support or oppose the Scheme.

Read in the reply ↗

Also in this review: closing letter, 2024-10-24

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2023

2024-05-01 to 2024-06-05 · 9 questions · 2 letters from the SEC, 2 from the company
Review closed 2024-06-05
RevenueNon-GAAP measuresResults discussion (MD&A)Income taxesSegments
Results of Operations by Segment · Adjusted Operating Income by Segment, page 46
SEC asked (1)
Although we note that "Adjusted Operating Income" at the segment level represents a required ASC 280 measure, please note that the measure on a total combined basis represents a non-GAAP measure. See Question 104.04 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures ("Non-GAAP C&DI's").
Rest of the question

Accordingly, if you continue to present such measure outside of your consolidated financial statements, please label it as a non-GAAP financial measure and ensure that your presentation and disclosures fully comply with non-GAAP rules, including Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K and the Non-GAAP C&DI's.

APTV answered
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment. We will revise our future filings to clearly label Adjusted Operating Income on a total basis as a non-GAAP financial measure if we continue to present it outside of our

5 Hanover Quay | Grand Canal | Dublin 2 | Ireland

Tel: 353.1.259.7206 E-mail: joseph.massaro@aptiv.com consolidated financial statements, and will ensure any such presentation of the measure complies with Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K and the non-GAAP C&DI’s. Read in the reply ↗
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
SEC asked (2)
Significant Accounting Policies Revenue recognition, page 71 2. Please address the following comments related to your revenue recognition policies and disclosures: • Tell us and revise your disclosures to clarify the specific nature of your performance obligations and to provide information about the methods, inputs, and assumptions used to determine transaction price, including estimating variable consideration and
Rest of the question

assessing whether an estimate of variable consideration is constrained, and, if applicable, the methods used to allocate transaction price to your performance obligations. See ASC 606-10-50-12, -50-17, and -50-20. • We note that you recognize revenue "based on the agreed-upon price at the time of shipment" for agreements with customers "that provide for price reductions, some of which are conditional upon achieving certain joint cost saving targets." Clarify what you mean by this disclosure and, in doing so, explain if the agreed-upon price is final or potentially subject to further adjustment. • We note your disclosure that certain payments to customers "meet the criteria to be considered a cost to obtain a contract." Tell us how your accounting policy complies with ASC 606-10-32-25. In doing so, clarify if you receive a distinct good or service from customers. Also explain the nature of and economic reasons for these payments, the amortization method used, and where the amortization is reflected on your statement of operations.

APTV answered
We respectfully advise the Staff that Aptiv’s performance obligations are discussed in greater detail in Note 24. Revenue in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, including disclosure of the nature of the Company’s goods and services provided in accordance with the requirements of ASC 606-10-50-12. For convenience, we have excerpted below relevant disclosures related to our performance obligations from Note 24.
Rest of the answer

Revenue within our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2023:

Nature of Goods and Services

The principal activity from which the Company generates its revenue is the manufacturing of production parts for OEM customers. Aptiv recognizes revenue for production parts at a point in time, rather than over time, as the performance obligation is satisfied when customers obtain control of the product upon title transfer and not as the product is manufactured or developed.

Although production parts are highly customized with no alternative use, Aptiv does not have an enforceable right to payment as customers have the right to cancel a product program without a notification period. The amount of revenue recognized is based on the purchase order price and adjusted for revenue allocated to variable consideration (i.e., estimated rebates and price discounts), as applicable. Customers typically pay for production parts based on customary business practices with payment terms averaging 60 days.

The Company also generates revenue from the sale of software licenses, post delivery support and maintenance and professional software services, primarily from Wind River, which the Company acquired in December 2022. Refer to Note 20. Acquisitions and Divestitures for further information on this acquisition. The Company generally recognizes revenue for software licenses and professional software services at a point in time upon delivery or when the services are provided. Revenue from post delivery support and maintenance for software contracts is generally recognized over time on a ratable basis over the contract term. Under certain of these arrangements, timing may differ between revenue recognition and billing.

Remaining Performance Obligations

For production parts, customer contracts generally are represented by a combination of a current purchase order and a current production schedule issued by the customer. There are no contracts for production parts outstanding beyond one year. Aptiv does not enter into fixed long-term supply agreements.

As permitted, Aptiv does not disclose information about remaining performance obligations that have original expected durations of one year or less for production parts.

Customer contracts for sales of software and related services are generally represented by a sales contract or purchase order with contract durations typically ranging from one to three years. Remaining performance obligations include contract liabilities and unbilled amounts that will be recognized as revenue in future periods. Transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligation is based on the standalone selling price. The value of the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations under software and related service contracts as of December 31, 2023 was approximately $217 million. The Company expects to recognize approximately 55% of remaining performance obligations as revenue in the next twelve months, and the remainder thereafter.

With regard to the determination of transaction price, including any variable consideration, the Company determines the transaction price as the amount of consideration to which Aptiv is expected to be entitled to in exchange for transferring promised goods and services to a customer. The consideration may include fixed amounts, variable amounts, or both. Fixed amounts are determined per the contract and/or customer purchase order. Variable consideration, including rebates and price reductions, is determined based on the specific terms and conditions of the agreement with the customer.

In most instances, there is no estimate required to determine the amount of consideration, as all information required is known at the time revenue is recorded. As also described in our below response to the subsequent Staff comment, in limited instances not all inputs and/or assumptions are available at the time revenue is recorded, and in such cases the Company records revenue based on the most likely amount in accordance with ASC 606-10-32-8(b), with any variable consideration to be adjusted, if necessary, when final information becomes available. Inputs and/or assumptions vary depending on the type of variable consideration present in the contract, with the most common inputs including the quantity of products sold by the Company and any contracted or offered per-part discount amounts, volume discount amounts or contractual rebate amounts. As described in our response to the following Staff comment, Aptiv also assesses the likelihood that the estimated variable consideration will be reversed in accordance with ASC 606-10-32-11. Based on Aptiv’s historical experience with each customer, our estimates of price reductions are generally in-line with the ultimate negotiated amount. Consequently, the variable consideration is not constrained.

With regard to the allocation of transaction price, as described in Note 24. Revenue, the Company generates most of its revenue from the sale of production parts to Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) customers. The Company’s contracts for the sale of these production parts do not contain multiple performance obligations and as such, there is no allocation of transaction price to be made. For the year ended December 31, 2023 approximately 98% of the Company’s revenue was generated from the sale of such production parts.

Also as described in Note 24. Revenue, the Company generates revenues from the sale of software licenses, and in certain cases post-delivery support and maintenance and professional software services, primarily from our acquisition of Wind River Systems, Inc. in December 2022. Revenue recognized from sales of these items in total represented approximately 2% of the Company’s revenue for the year ended December 31, 2023.

In certain cases, the Company’s software license contracts include multiple performance obligations, for which the Company allocates the transaction price to each distinct performance obligation and recognizes revenue when, or as, each performance obligation is satisfied. The Company allocates the contract’s transaction price to each performance obligation based on the relative standalone selling price. The Company’s standalone selling prices are generally determined using observable inputs, such as prices of standalone sales and historical contract pricing.

The Company will expand its disclosures in future filings to more clearly describe the specific nature of our performance obligations and to provide additional information as described above. Set forth below is the Company’s proposed revised disclosure based on the prior disclosure included in Note 2. Significant

Accounting Policies of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, with the proposed additional disclosure underlined:

Revenue recognition—Revenue is measured based on consideration specified in a contract with a customer. Customer contracts for production parts generally are represented by a combination of a current purchase order and a current production schedule issued by the customer. Substantially all of the Company's revenue is generated from the sale of manufactured production parts, wherein there is a single performance obligation. Transfer of control and revenue recognition for the Company’s sales of production parts generally occurs upon shipment or delivery of the product, which is when title, ownership, and risk of loss pass to the customer and is based on the applicable customer shipping terms. Revenue is measured based on the transaction price and the quantity of parts specified in a contract with a customer. Refer to Note 24. Revenue for further detail of the Company’s accounting for its revenue from sales of production parts.

Customer contracts for software licenses are generally represented by a sales contract or purchase order with contract durations typically ranging from one to three years. The Company recognizes revenue when it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring control over a product or service to a customer. Revenue from software licenses and professional software services is generally recognized at a point in time upon delivery or when the services are provided. Revenue from post delivery support and maintenance for software contracts is generally recognized over time on a ratable basis over the contract term. Certain software license contracts contain multiple performance obligations, for which the Company allocates the contract’s transaction price to each performance obligation based on the estimated relative standalone selling price of each distinct performance obligation in the contract. The standalone selling prices are generally determined based on observable inputs, such as the prices of standalone sales and historical contract pricing. Under certain of these arrangements, timing may differ between revenue recognition and billing. Refer to Note 24. Revenue for further detail of the Company’s accounting for its revenue from contracts with customers, including contract balances associated with software sales.

From time to time, Aptiv enters into pricing agreements with its customers that provide for price reductions on production parts, some of which are conditional upon achieving certain joint cost saving targets, which are accounted for as variable consideration. In these instances, revenue is recognized based on the agreed-upon price at the time of shipment if available, or in the event the Company concludes that a portion of the revenue for a given part may vary from the purchase order and requires estimation, the Company records consideration at the most likely amount that the Company expects to be entitled to based on historical experience and input from customer negotiations.

•We note that you recognize revenue “based on the agreed-upon price at the time of shipment” for agreements with customers “that provide for price reductions, some of which are conditional upon achieving certain joint cost saving targets.” Clarify what you mean by this disclosure and, in doing so, explain if the agreed-upon price is final or potentially subject to further adjustment.

We respectfully advise the Staff that this disclosure regarding price reductions refers to the practice wherein, as part of the award of a new program from a customer, in certain cases Aptiv agrees to provide annual per-part price reductions (“APR”) to the customer over the life of the program. The offer of annual price reductions in conjunction with a new business award is customary in the automotive industry. Although a customer program award letter outlines several aspects of a product program, including expected annual price reductions, the award letter itself is not legally binding and does not constitute a contract.

The offer of the APR at the time of program award is not binding. The actual price reduction ultimately agreed can vary from the targets or the price reductions that were originally offered as part of the program award due to a number of factors, including changes in volumes or costs. APR’s may be negotiated based on combined cost reduction targets, and may be subject to prolonged negotiations with the customer.

Aptiv and its customers negotiate pricing on an annual basis during an active program, and accordingly, in most cases Aptiv sells its products to customers at fixed, agreed-upon prices. To the extent an APR has been agreed to with the customer for a given year, the transaction price for our performance obligation is final and not subject to further adjustment.

In certain instances, APR negotiations with the customer remain on-going even after a purchase order is received and Aptiv ships production parts to the customer. In such instances, the transaction price is not final. Aptiv accounts for these transactions pursuant to the variable consideration guidance in ASC 606-10-32-5, and estimates the variable consideration using the “the most likely amount” as defined by ASC 606-10-32-8 and, in accordance with 606-10-32-9, applies this method consistently. As described above in our response to the preceding Staff comment, Aptiv also assesses the likelihood that the estimated variable consideration will be reversed in accordance with ASC 606-10-32-11. Based on Aptiv’s historical experience with each customer, our estimates of price reductions are generally in-line with the ultimate negotiated amount.

•We note your disclosure that certain payments to customers “meet the criteria to be considered a cost to obtain a contract.” Tell us how your accounting policy complies with ASC 606-10-32-25. In doing so, clarify if you receive a distinct good or service from customers. Also explain the nature of and economic reasons for these payments, the amortization method used, and where the amortization is reflected on your statement of operations.

The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment. It is common in the automotive supply industry for OEMs to seek to receive upfront cash payments from their suppliers in exchange for the award of long-term supply arrangements. In certain instances, Aptiv makes such one-time, upfront payments to its customers in connection with the award of new business to us, which become payable upon the award of business by the OEM. These business awards are often made multiple periods in advance of the start of production and the related receipt of customer purchase orders by Aptiv, and the customer has the right to terminate these awards at their convenience prior to the start of production. Aptiv does not receive a distinct good or service from the customer in exchange for these payments.

Aptiv applies the guidance within ASC 606-10-32-25 to this form of consideration paid to our customers. As described above, we often make these up-front payments to customers in anticipation of future purchases, and there may not yet be a contract with the customer as defined by ASC 606. Therefore, for each up-front payment made to a customer we evaluate the nature of the payment, the rights and obligations of the parties and whether the payment meets the definition of an asset in order to determine the appropriate accounting treatment for the up-front payment.

As part of its agreement to make an upfront payment to a customer, in certain arrangements Aptiv negotiates a contractual volume guarantee from the customer, which allows Aptiv to recover all or a portion of the up-front payment made in the event that the volumes ultimately purchased by the customer associated with the awarded program fall below a defined threshold. For payments that are offered and made pursuant to an agreement that includes such a guaranteed volume clause, Aptiv records the amounts paid as an asset as it has a contractual right to reimbursement from the OEM of the upfront payment. Consistent with ASC 606-10-32-27, the asset is amortized over the life of the related product program with a corresponding reduction to revenue on a basis consistent with the Company’s transfer of the contractual sales volumes to the customer in each period. As disclosed in Note 24. Revenue, the length of the typical customer program is three to five years. We assess the asset for recoverability each period.

For upfront payments made to customers that do not contain such a contractual volume guarantee, as Aptiv has no further contractual right to the funds, we record the payment as a reduction to revenue at the time of the commitment to make the payment.

Read in the reply ↗
Pre-production costs related to long-term supply agreements, page 72
SEC asked (3)
We note that you incur "pre-production engineering, development and tooling costs related to products produced for its customers under long-term supply agreements." Please confirm for us the ASC guidance you apply in accounting for such arrangements.
Rest of the question

In doing so, provide your assessment of whether such activities represent a promised good or service under ASC 606 and whether such costs fall within the scope of ASC 340-10 or ASC 340-40. 14. Income Taxes, page 96

APTV answered
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment. As described in our financial statements, we enter into long-term supply arrangements with OEMs to design, manufacture, and supply parts for the OEMs to use in the production of particular vehicle platforms for their production life cycles. We often incur costs related to the engineering, design, and development of the parts that will be supplied to the OEM as part of these long-term supply arrangements.
Rest of the answer

In addition, we may also incur costs to design and develop molds, dies, and other tools (collectively, “tooling”) that will be used in manufacturing the parts. These pre-production activities are often governed by standalone agreements with the OEMs, which in certain cases include contractual reimbursement to us for all or a portion of the costs incurred by Aptiv.

The Company accounts for these pre-production costs in accordance with ASC 340-10-25, consistent with FASB Revenue Recognition Implementation Issue Q&A numbers 65 and 66, both prior to, and subsequent to, the Company’s adoption of ASC 606. Consistent with the Company’s determination prior to its adoption of ASC 606, the Company concluded that these pre-production activities do not constitute its major or central operations. As such these pre-production activities do not represent promised revenue-generating goods or services within the scope of ASC 606.

The Company similarly evaluated the applicability of ASC 340-40 in connection with its adoption of ASC 606. As noted above, Aptiv’s pre-production activities were determined to be within the scope of ASC 340-10. As the scope of ASC 340-40 was specifically limited to costs that were not subject to existing U.S. GAAP (including ASC 340-10), the Company determined that its pre-production activities were not within the scope of ASC 340-40.

14. Income Taxes, page 96

Read in the reply ↗
Pre-production costs related to long-term supply agreements, page 72
SEC asked (4)
Your disclosure on page 130 indicates that you have charged approximately $2.3 billion to costs and expenses to increase your tax valuation allowance to approximately $3 billion as of December 31, 2023. We also note that your effective tax rate reconciliation on page 96 shows an adjustment of only $1 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.
Rest of the question

Please reconcile for us the material difference between these amounts.

APTV answered
The noted difference arises due to the fact that Schedule II presents solely the amounts charged to the valuation allowance, while the Company’s effective tax rate reconciliation presents the effect of tax expense items net of any valuation allowance, as applicable.

The valuation allowance increased by $2,264 million primarily due to: (i) an increase in the valuation allowance of $990 million as a result of certain intercompany transactions in 2023 which had no net tax expense impact as it was offset with a reduction in deferred tax liabilities eliminated as part of the intercompany
Rest of the answer

transactions; and (ii) an increase in the valuation allowance of $1,190 million, which partially offset a $1,520 million income tax credit that was granted to the Company’s Swiss subsidiary in 2023, resulting in a net benefit of $330 million, as disclosed in Note 14. Income Taxes in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023. The portion of these amounts that impacted income tax expense was included within the Intercompany reorganizations line of our effective income tax rate reconciliation that was disclosed in Note 14. Income Taxes in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023.

14. Income Taxes, page 96

Read in the reply ↗
Pre-production costs related to long-term supply agreements, page 72
SEC asked (5)
We note that you have material foreign income and, based on your disclosure on page 47, that your cash balance is primarily located outside of the United States. Please disclose in future filings the amount of unremitted foreign earnings and the unrecognized deferred tax liability on unremitted foreign earnings, if practicable, or a statement that such determination is not practicable. See ASC 740-30-50-2b and 2c.
Rest of the question

24. Revenue, page 123

APTV answered
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment, and in future filings will disclose the cumulative amount of unremitted foreign earnings for which a deferred tax liability has not been recognized because of the exceptions to comprehensive recognition of deferred taxes related to subsidiaries and joint ventures as required by ASC 740-30-50-2b. The Company will also disclose the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability for such temporary differences if practicable, or a statement that such determination is not practicable, as required by ASC 740-30-50-2c.

24. Revenue, page 123 Read in the reply ↗
Pre-production costs related to long-term supply agreements, page 72
SEC asked (6)
We note that you recognize revenue related to production parts, software licenses, post delivery support and maintenance and professional software services. We further note your disclosures on page 8 of the products and services of your "core product lines," including revenue quantification of your distribution systems revenues.
Rest of the question

Please tell us your consideration of providing disaggregated revenue disclosures of such categories pursuant to ASC 606-10-50-5 and ASC 606-10-55-89 through 55-91. To the extent you believe your current disclosures fully comply with such guidance, further clarify how your disclosures comply with the product and services disclosure requirement of ASC 280-1050-40. As part of your response, ensure you tell us the specific revenue categories included in the information regularly provided to your chief operating decision maker. Exhibit 99.1 , page 1

APTV answered
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and after further review of the guidance in ASC 280-10-50-40, ASC 606-10-50-5 and ASC 606-10-55-89 through 55-91, confirms that, in future filings, beginning with the Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2024, the Company will include an additional disclosure to present revenue disaggregated by core product line.
Rest of the answer

In arriving at this conclusion, the Company reconsidered the specific revenue categories included in the information regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (the “CODM”), which includes:

•Total Aptiv level reporting - represents the financial results and information for all operating results of the Company as a whole (i.e. consolidated results).

•Segment level reporting - consists of a disaggregation of the Total Aptiv level into our two reportable operating segments (Advanced Safety and User Experience and Signal and Power Solution), which are grouped primarily on the basis of similar product, market and operating factors consistent with how management has organized the Company for making operating decisions and assessing performance.

•Region level reporting - consists of a disaggregation of the Total Aptiv level into geographic regions

•Core Product Line / Business Unit level reporting - consists of a disaggregation into Aptiv’s core product lines / business units.

Pursuant to the guidance in ASC 606-10-50-5 and ASC 606-10-55-89 through 91, we continue to believe that presenting revenue by both segment and geographic region represents an important depiction of how our revenues and related cash flows are impacted by economic factors and we will continue to disclose such information. Furthermore, as the CODM is regularly reviewing revenue data by core product line and this data is regularly presented in the Company’s investor presentations, we will provide this additional information in future filings. Management believes that disclosing product line revenues will provide the users of its financial statements with relevant and useful information in understanding how the nature, amounts, timing and uncertainties of Aptiv’s revenue and related cash flows are impacted by economic factors. We anticipate disclosing the following product line categories in our Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2024:

•Electrical Distribution Systems

•Engineered Components Group

•Active Safety

•Smart Vehicle Compute & Software

•User Experience and Other

•Other / Eliminations

We will provide this disclosure in the revenue footnote to our consolidated financial statements.

Read in the reply ↗
Pre-production costs related to long-term supply agreements, page 72
SEC asked (7)
We note that you quantify Adjusted Operating Income, Adjusted Operating Income margin and/or Adjusted EBITDA margin on pages 1-3 without presenting a comparative GAAP measure with equal or greater prominence. We further note that your "Full year 2024 Outlook" table on page 3 includes several non-GAAP measures without presentation of a comparative GAAP measure.
Rest of the question

Please revise future filings to present GAAP measures with equal or greater prominence. Refer to Item 10(e)(1)(i) of Regulation S-K and Section 103 and Question 102.10 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

APTV answered
The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and will revise our future filings to present the U.S. GAAP measures Net Income attributable to Aptiv and Net Income attributable to Aptiv margin, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures, with equal or greater prominence when presenting the non-GAAP financial measures Adjusted Operating Income and Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted Operating Income margin and Adjusted EBITDA margin, respectively.

The Company further advises that it will revise its future filings to present the most directly comparable U.S.
Rest of the answer

GAAP measures with equal or greater prominence when presenting non-GAAP financial guidance financial measures.

Read in the reply ↗
Pre-production costs related to long-term supply agreements, page 72
SEC asked (8)
We note that your financial guidance reconciliation table on page 21 does not reconcile your non-GAAP EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margins to the GAAP equivalent. Please revise future filings to reconcile such measures to the GAAP equivalent pursuant to Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K and Section 103 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
APTV answered
The Company acknowledges the Staff's comment and will revise the financial guidance reconciliation table in future filings to reconcile EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margins to Net Income attributable to Aptiv margin, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure. Read in the reply ↗
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
SEC asked
Significant Accounting Policies, Revenue Recognition, page 71 1. We note within your response to comment 2 that you recognize upfront payments to customers without contractual volume guarantees as a reduction of revenue at the time of the commitment to make the payment.
Rest of the question

Please tell us in further detail how you determined such accounting treatment was more appropriate than recognizing the reduction of revenue as the related goods are transferred to customers. In doing so, ensure you explain the underlying economic reasons for the payments, your history of recovering the payments, including your history of renewals and average customer lives, whether the payments secure an exclusivity agreement with customers or provide other contractual assurances, whether the payments are expected to recur with the same customer, and whether the related supply contracts have specified lives. Exhibit 99.1, page 1 2. We note your response to comment 7 indicates that net income attributable to Aptiv and the related margin are the most directly comparable GAAP measures to Adjusted Operating Income and Adjusted Operating Income margin. Please tell us how you determined operating income and operating income margin were not the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

APTV answered
5 Hanover Quay | Grand Canal | Dublin 2 | Ireland

Tel: 353.1.259.7206 E-mail: joseph.massaro@aptiv.com

As previously noted, there is a long-standing practice in the automotive supply industry for Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”) to seek to receive upfront cash payments from their suppliers in exchange for the award of long-term supply arrangements. In certain instances, Aptiv makes such one-time, upfront payments to its customers in connection with the award of future new business to us, which become payable upon the award of business by the OEM.
Rest of the answer

These business awards are often made multiple years in advance of the start of production and the related receipt of customer purchase orders by Aptiv, and the OEM has the right to terminate these awards at their convenience prior to the start of, and at any point during, production.

Aptiv applies the guidance within ASC 606-10-32-25 to this form of consideration paid to our customers. In recent periods, the Company has been able to obtain contractual volume guarantees from the customer in many cases. Upfront payments made to customers without such a contractual volume guarantee have not been significant in recent periods. Nevertheless, for each upfront payment made to a customer we evaluate the nature of the payment, the rights and obligations of the parties and whether the payment meets the definition of an asset, in order to determine the appropriate accounting treatment for the upfront payment.

As described above, we generally make these up-front payments to customers well in advance of anticipated future purchases, when there is not yet a contract with the customer as defined by ASC 606. For production parts, customer contracts generally are represented by a combination of a current purchase order and a current production schedule issued by the customer. Although a customer program award letter outlines several aspects of a product program, including expected future volumes, the award letter itself is not legally binding and does not constitute a contract, and may be cancelled unilaterally by the OEM or modified substantially.

For upfront payments made to customers that do not contain a contractual volume guarantee, Aptiv has no further contractual right to the funds, and has no ability to recover the upfront payment from the customer in the event of a program cancellation, deferral or volume reduction. The payments do not secure an exclusivity agreement nor provide any other contractual assurances beyond the non-binding program award. Our automotive production parts are sold pursuant to customer purchase orders and production schedules issued to us, which generally do not have fixed contractual terms or specified lives, and are therefore not renewable. As there are a limited number of global OEMs, we have made payments to the same customers, but for different non-binding program awards.

Consequently, in instances where we do not have a contractual guarantee to recover the upfront payment, we generally do not believe it is appropriate to defer such payments until the future periods when the related goods are, or may be, transferred to the customer due to the substantial uncertainty generated as a result of the significant lapse of time between the non-binding program award and the start of production. As mentioned, we have no contractual right to recover the funds or to any contractual rights to any future economic benefit. The customer has the ability to cancel for their convenience, defer or reduce program volumes at any point prior to or during production. Due to the high degree of uncertainty as to our ultimate ability to realize an economic benefit in the case of each specific payment we generally do not believe it is appropriate to recognize an asset. This contrasts to payments made to customers for which we do obtain contractual volume guarantees, which do provide us with contractual rights to future economic benefits and to recovery of the upfront payment in the event of program cancellation, deferral or volume reduction.

Exhibit 99.1, page 1

2. We note your response to comment 7 indicates that net income attributable to Aptiv and the related margin are the most directly comparable GAAP measures to Adjusted Operating Income and Adjusted Operating Income margin. Please tell us how you determined operating income and operating income margin were not the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

We follow the Staff’s guidance on the presentation and reconciliation of Non-GAAP financial measures. With respect to Adjusted Operating Income and associated margin, we have heretofore reconciled this Non-GAAP financial measure to Net Income attributable to Aptiv. In making the determination to begin the reconciliation with Net Income attributable to Aptiv, we considered that there is not a common definition and usage of the measure “Operating Income” when presented in accordance with US GAAP. It is an optional sub-total that may be included in a registrant’s income statement presented in accordance with US GAAP. Furthermore, although we do not label or describe the measure as such, it is common for certain users of financial statements to refer to Operating Income as “EBIT” and to use our presentation of Adjusted Operating Income for comparison to financial measures presented by other registrants labeled as, or similar to, “EBIT” or “Adjusted EBIT”. We also present Adjusted EBITDA, an additional non-GAAP financial measure, in our earnings releases. In accordance with C&DI 103.02, we reconcile Adjusted EBITDA to Net income attributable to Aptiv. Therefore, in order to provide users of our financial information with the most comprehensive US GAAP information and a consistent method of reconciling non-GAAP financial measures, we have reconciled Adjusted Operating Income to Net Income attributable to Aptiv. In our quarterly earnings releases, we have historically provided that reconciliation in the form of the below, as excerpted from our Q4 2023 earnings release, which presents the reconciliation beginning with Net Income attributable to Aptiv, as well as Operating Income presented in accordance with US GAAP.

Consolidated Adjusted Operating Income

Three Months Ended Year Ended

December 31, December 31,

2023 2022 2023 2022

($ in millions)

Read in the reply ↗

Also in this review: closing letter, 2024-06-05

Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2021

2021-06-23 to 2021-07-02 · 1 question · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2021-07-02
Non-GAAP measures
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures · Adjusted EBITDA, page 13
SEC asked
We note your presentation of the non-GAAP financial measure "EBITDA" which adjusts for Equity loss (income), net of tax. By definition, EBITDA should only reflect adjustments for interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization.
Rest of the question

In future periodic filings to include your earnings releases, please revise to remove this adjustment from your calculation of EBITDA; note that such adjustment may be considered in your calculation of Adjusted EBITDA. Refer to Question 103.01 of the Division’s Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations.

APTV answered
The Company acknowledges the Staff's Comment, and will revise its future filings to only include interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization as adjustments from net income in the calculation of the EBITDA financial measure. The reconciliation to be provided in future filings will be substantially in the form of the below table.

5 Hanover Quay | Grand Canal | Dublin 2 | Ireland

Tel: 353.1.259.7013 E-mail: joseph.massaro@aptiv.com

Adjusted EBITDA: Adjusted EBITDA is presented as a supplemental measure of the Company’s financial performance which management believes is
Rest of the answer

useful to investors in assessing the Company’s ongoing financial performance that, when reconciled to the corresponding U.S. GAAP measure, provides improved comparability between periods through the exclusion of certain items that management believes are not indicative of the Company’s core operating performance and which may obscure underlying business results and trends. Our management utilizes Adjusted EBITDA in its financial decision making process, to evaluate performance of the Company and for internal reporting, planning and forecasting purposes. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income before depreciation and amortization (including asset impairment), interest expense, income tax (expense) benefit, other income (expense), net, equity income (loss), net of tax, restructuring and other special items. Not all companies use identical calculations of Adjusted EBITDA, therefore this presentation may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA

Three Months Ended March 31,

2021 2020

(in millions)

Read in the reply ↗

Also in this review: closing letter, 2021-07-02

Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2016

2017-03-23 to 2017-04-03 · 2 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2017-04-03
Non-GAAP measures
Item 6. Selected Financial Data, pages 31
SEC asked (1)
We note your reconciliation of adjusted operating income to net income attributable to the Company. Please revise your next Form 10-Q to begin your reconciliation with GAAP results rather than non-GAAP results, in each place this reconciliation is disclosed in your filing. Please refer to Question 102.10 of the non-GAAP C&DIs.
APTV answered
The Company acknowledges the Staff's Comment, and will revise its future filings that include the presentation of non-GAAP financial measures to begin the applicable reconciliation with the corresponding GAAP financial measure rather than non-GAAP financial measure.

5725 Delphi Drive, Troy, Michigan USA 48098

Tel: [1] 248.813.2000 E-mail: joseph.massaro@delphi.com

Form 8-K Filed February 2, 2017: Read in the reply ↗
Form 8-K Filed February 2, 2017
SEC asked (2)
We note your Q1 and full year 2017 financial guidance for adjusted operating income and income margin and adjusted earnings per share. However, it does not appear that you have included a reconciliation of those measures to the most comparable GAAP measures in accordance with Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B).
Rest of the question

If you have excluded a quantitative reconciliation for the forward-looking non-GAAP measures in reliance on the "unreasonable efforts" exception in Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B), please revise to disclose this fact and identify that the information is unavailable. Please refer to Question 102.10 of the updated Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations issued on May 17, 2016.

APTV answered
The Company acknowledges the Staff's Comment and will revise its future filings that include forward-looking non-GAAP financial guidance to include a quantitative reconciliation of forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable forward-looking GAAP financial measure. The reconciliation to be provided in future filings will be substantially in the form of the below table.

The reconciliation of the forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable forward-looking GAAP measure for Q1 2017 and full year 2017, as presented in the Company's Form 8-K filed on
Rest of the answer

February 2, 2017, is as follows:

Estimated

Q1

Full Year

2017 (1)

($ and shares in millions, except per share amounts)

Adjusted Operating Income

$

Margin (2)

Net income attributable to Delphi

295

1,470

Interest expense

140

Income tax expense

300

Equity income, net of tax

(5

)

(30

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

Operating income

400

9.8

%

1,940

11.6

Restructuring

100

265

Other acquisition and portfolio project costs

Adjusted operating income

505

12.3

2,235

13.4

Adjusted Net Income per share

Tax impact of adjusting items

(10

(20

Adjusted net income attributable to Delphi

390

1,745

Weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding

269.80

266.60

Diluted net income per share attributable to Delphi

1.09

5.51

Adjusted net income per share

1.45

6.55

(1) Prepared at the estimated mid-point of the Company's financial guidance range.

(2) Represents Operating Income and Adjusted Operating Income, respectively, as a percentage of estimated Revenue.

Read in the reply ↗

Also in this review: closing letter, 2017-04-03

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 14 letters filed since 2017-03-23. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. No AI.

Work on APTV in a spreadsheet: Excel workbook (a sheet per section, ten years by column, charts, links to the filings) · CSV. For a Google Sheet that stays up to date, paste =IMPORTDATA("https://tickdelta.com/company/APTV/export.csv") into a cell.