BSXBoston Scientific

As a global developer, manufacturer and marketer of medical devices, our business is subject to local and international macroeconomic trends as well as geopolitical factors. Continued uncertainty around inflationary pressures, interest rates, foreign currency fluctuations, global trade policies and changes in tax laws, as well as actions by governments in response thereto, could create economic challenges which could negatively impact our business and results of operations. There continues to be significant uncertainty in the tariff environment and with respect to global trade policies, including changing tariff rates, tariff imposition delays, and the potential for reciprocal restrictive trade policies by the U.S. or other governments around the world. We continue to anticipate incurring incremental costs under the current schedule of tariffs on U.S. imports announced by the U.S. government, as well as any potential increases in tariffs introduced by China on U.S. manufactured products. While global the U.S. and other governments continue negotiations on such measures, these and any further tariff increases on our products by the U.S., China or any other country or region, as well as sanctions or other measures that restrict international trade, could have a material adverse impact on our business operations and results. We continue to monitor the situation while exploring opportunities to mitigate the impacts of such tariffs. There can be no guarantee that we will be able to offset the impact of tariffs, the ultimate impact of which will depend on various factors, including the timing, scope, duration and nature of any tariffs, any other trade restrictions or opportunities to mitigate such impacts. Global supply chain disruptions conditions have continued to improve in 2024, improve, however we have experienced, continued to experience, and may continue to in the future experience, increases in cost and limited availability of certain raw materials, components, and other inputs necessary to manufacture and distribute our products due to constraints and inflation within the global supply chain, as well as increases in wage costs and the cost and time to distribute our products. Uncertainty around inflationary pressures, interest rates, monetary policy, trade policies, foreign currency fluctuations Further, geopolitical developments and changes in tax laws, as well as actions by governments in response thereto, could create additional economic challenges which could negatively impact our business operations and results. Geopolitical developments, uncertainties, including related to various ongoing global conflicts and tensions, may also create economic, supply chain, transportation, energy, and other challenges, including disruptions to business our suppliers or our customers' operations, which could negatively impact our business and results of operations. Further, sanctions, tariffs, or other measures that restrict international trade, as well as instability resulting from global conflicts, could negatively affect our business operations and results.

related to the taxation of multinational corporations. The OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework (IF) on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) includes actions intended to equip governments with domestic and international rules and instruments to address tax avoidance, ensuring that profits are taxed where economic activities generating the profits are performed and where value is created. The actions include a two-pillar solution to address the tax challenges of the digitalized economy. Pillar One focuses on how profits are allocated between taxing jurisdictions and Pillar Two creates a 15% global minimum tax. Many countries where we do business have already implemented into their national laws, a global minimum effective tax rate of 15% based on the Pillar Two global minimum tax into their national laws. framework issued by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Other countries are considering enacting laws consistent with the Pillar Two rules, while still others have yet to announce their intention to adopt. The United States has not enacted the Pillar Two global minimum tax and the current administration recently announced its intention to effectively withdraw from on January 5, 2026, the OECD Inclusive Framework released new Administrative Guidance that introduced two new safe harbors which would effectively exempt US-based multinational companies and their subsidiaries from certain elements of the OECD global minimum tax framework beginning in 2026. However, these safe harbors must now be legislated domestically by each framework member country in accordance with their own process and timelines. We expect that, if ultimately enacted into law in the relevant countries, the new safe harbors would be beneficial to our tax rate from continuing operations. However, Pillar Two remains enacted law and significant uncertainty exists regarding the implementation of the January 5th guidance as well as its intention to enact retaliatory measures against countries who assert extraterritorial taxes against U.S. taxpayers. The OECD continues to issue guidance on the Pillar Two framework, with new rules released as recently as January, 2025. While we continue to monitor legislative adoption of Pillar Two by country, as well as for additional guidance from the OECD, there is significant uncertainty that exists regarding the interpretation of the detailed existing Pillar Two rules, whether such rules will be implemented consistently across taxing jurisdictions, how such rules interact with existing national tax laws and whether such rules are consistent with existing tax treaty obligations. Accordingly, the final adoption, implementation, and interpretation of Pillar Two across all jurisdictions where we do business could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.