BTCSBTCS
BTCS Inc. (“BTCS” or the “Company”) is a U.S.-based, Nasdaq-listed blockchain technology company focused on revenue generation through blockchain infrastructure and decentralized finance (“DeFi”) activities, primarily on the Ethereum network. 10-K, Item 1
- Headquarters
- Wayne, PA
- CEO
- Charles W. Allen
- Next results
- around Jan 6, 2027
What changed
10-K filed Mar 26, 2026 against Mar 20, 2025| Area | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Risk factors | 7 new paragraphs, nothing like them in the previous 10-K | 10-K Item 1A |
| Auditor change | 8-K item 4.01 (change in certifying accountant) filed 2026-03-31 | 10-K · XBRL |
| Going concern language | “Evaluation of Liquidity and the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern Critical Audit Matter Description As described in Note 13 to the financial statements, management evaluated whether conditions or events raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, which contemplates the continuity of operations, realization of assets, and settlement of liabili” | 10-K · XBRL |
| Late filing notice (NT 10-K or NT 10-Q) | NT 10-Q filed 2026-08-17: the company said its 10-Q would be late | 10-K · XBRL |
| Critical audit matters changed | New this year: Evaluation of Liquidity and the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“As described in Note 13 to the financial statements, management evaluated whether conditions or events raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, which contemplates the continuity of operations, realization of assets, and settlement of liabilities in the nor”); F-1; Evaluated management’s cash flow projections for the twelve-month period following the issuance; Assessed the feasibility and probability of management’s plan to complete the proposed equity offering; Evaluated the existence of digital assets by ascertaining the fair value of such assets from observable; Evaluated the adequacy of the going concern disclosures in the financial statements and footnotes in accordance (“Crypto assets are generally accessible only by the possessor of the unique private key relating to the digital wallet or node in which the crypto assets are held. Accordingly, private keys must be safeguarded and secured in order to prevent an unauthorized party from accessing the crypto assets with”); Assessed management’s conclusion that substantial doubt is alleviated based on the totality of evidence (“Crypto assets are generally accessible only by the possessor of the unique private key relating to the digital wallet or node in which the crypto assets are held. Accordingly, private keys must be safeguarded and secured in order to prevent an unauthorized party from accessing the crypto assets with”); We consulted with subject matter experts regarding our planned audit response to address certain risks (“We applied auditor judgment in determining the nature and extent of audit evidence required, especially related to assessing the existence of the digital assets and whether the Company controls the digital assets. We evaluated the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence obtained by assessi”); We noted the controls within the Company’s private key management process including controls related (“We applied auditor judgment in determining the nature and extent of audit evidence required, especially related to assessing the existence of the digital assets and whether the Company controls the digital assets. We evaluated the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence obtained by assessi”); We tested the effectiveness of management’s reconciliation control of internal books and records (“We applied auditor judgment in determining the nature and extent of audit evidence required, especially related to assessing the existence of the digital assets and whether the Company controls the digital assets. We evaluated the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence obtained by assessi”); We obtained evidence that management has control of the private keys required to access crypto assets (“We applied auditor judgment in determining the nature and extent of audit evidence required, especially related to assessing the existence of the digital assets and whether the Company controls the digital assets. We evaluated the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence obtained by assessi”). Same as last year: Corporate Crypto Assets Held | 10-K · XBRL |
| Accounting checks | 4 other checks clear, 4 worth a look | 10-K · XBRL |
| Insiders | No open-market buys in the last 90 days | Form 4 |
| Filings | 0 in the last 30 days | EDGAR |
Each row opens the detail with the quote and the filing. A row is a change worth reading, not a verdict.
What's new, in their words
10-K filed Mar 26, 2026Paragraphs in Risk Factors that were not in the 10-K filed 2025-03-20. Quoted as filed.
We conduct periodic cybersecurity risk assessments to identify reasonably foreseeable internal and external cybersecurity threats, including assessments conducted in connection with material changes to our business operations, systems, or third-party relationships. These risk assessments evaluate, among other things, the potential…
10-K, Item 1A
Accounting checks
latest 10-K4 of 8 clear 4 worth a look. Checks, not verdicts.
- !Auditor change8-K item 4.01 (change in certifying accountant) filed 2026-03-31
- !Going concern language“Evaluation of Liquidity and the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern Critical Audit Matter Description As described in Note 13 to the financial statements, management evaluated whether conditions or events raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, which contemplates the continuity of operations, realization of assets, and settlement of liabili”
- !Late filing notice (NT 10-K or NT 10-Q)NT 10-Q filed 2026-08-17: the company said its 10-Q would be late
- !Critical audit matters changedNew this year: Evaluation of Liquidity and the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“As described in Note 13 to the financial statements, management evaluated whether conditions or events raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, which contemplates the continuity of operations, realization of assets, and settlement of liabilities in the nor”); F-1; Evaluated management’s cash flow projections for the twelve-month period following the issuance; Assessed the feasibility and probability of management’s plan to complete the proposed equity offering; Evaluated the existence of digital assets by ascertaining the fair value of such assets from observable; Evaluated the adequacy of the going concern disclosures in the financial statements and footnotes in accordance (“Crypto assets are generally accessible only by the possessor of the unique private key relating to the digital wallet or node in which the crypto assets are held. Accordingly, private keys must be safeguarded and secured in order to prevent an unauthorized party from accessing the crypto assets with”); Assessed management’s conclusion that substantial doubt is alleviated based on the totality of evidence (“Crypto assets are generally accessible only by the possessor of the unique private key relating to the digital wallet or node in which the crypto assets are held. Accordingly, private keys must be safeguarded and secured in order to prevent an unauthorized party from accessing the crypto assets with”); We consulted with subject matter experts regarding our planned audit response to address certain risks (“We applied auditor judgment in determining the nature and extent of audit evidence required, especially related to assessing the existence of the digital assets and whether the Company controls the digital assets. We evaluated the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence obtained by assessi”); We noted the controls within the Company’s private key management process including controls related (“We applied auditor judgment in determining the nature and extent of audit evidence required, especially related to assessing the existence of the digital assets and whether the Company controls the digital assets. We evaluated the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence obtained by assessi”); We tested the effectiveness of management’s reconciliation control of internal books and records (“We applied auditor judgment in determining the nature and extent of audit evidence required, especially related to assessing the existence of the digital assets and whether the Company controls the digital assets. We evaluated the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence obtained by assessi”); We obtained evidence that management has control of the private keys required to access crypto assets (“We applied auditor judgment in determining the nature and extent of audit evidence required, especially related to assessing the existence of the digital assets and whether the Company controls the digital assets. We evaluated the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence obtained by assessi”). Same as last year: Corporate Crypto Assets Held
- ✓No 8-K item 4.02 in the last 2 years
- ✓No sentence in the 10-K concludes that controls were not effective because of a material weakness
- ✓No 8-K item 2.06 in the last 2 years
- ✓No 8-K item 1.03 in the last 2 years
In the last 30 days
All filings →Nothing new. The most recent filings:
- Aug 25, 20268-K New debt or obligation 8-K item 2.03
- Aug 20, 20268-K Regulation FD disclosure 8-K item 7.01
- Aug 19, 202610-Q Quarterly report (10-Q) period ended Jun 30, 2026
- Aug 17, 2026Late filing Late filing notice: the 10-Q will be late NT 10-Q (Form 12b-25), period ended Jun 30, 2026
Get an email when this changes: new risk paragraphs, accounting items, insider purchases, a new 10-K or 10-Q.
RSS feed
Work on BTCS in a spreadsheet:
Excel workbook (a sheet per section, ten years by column, charts, links to the filings) ·
CSV.
For a Google Sheet that stays up to date, paste =IMPORTDATA("https://tickdelta.com/company/BTCS/export.csv") into a cell.