tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

COPConocoPhillips

Energy · Oil Refining · NYSE
Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

1 review of COP's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
1
latest letter 2024-07-12
Questions asked
1
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
1
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form S-4

2024-07-12 to 2024-07-22 · 1 question · 1 letter from the SEC, 2 from the company
No closing letter
Income taxesAcquisitions
SEC asked
We have conducted a limited review of your registration statement and have the following comment(s). Please respond to this letter by amending your registration statement and providing the requested information. If you do not believe a comment applies to your facts and circumstances or do not believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your response.
Rest of the question

After reviewing any amendment to your registration statement and the information you provide in response to this letter, we may have additional comments. Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed June 25, 2024 Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger, page 112 We note that the tax opinions filed at Exhibits 8.1 and 8.2 express no opinion but state that the discussion set forth in the registration statement under the caption “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger” is accurate in all material respects. Please revise your disclosure and have counsel revise their respective tax opinions to state clearly that the tax consequences discussed in this section are counsel’s opinion. A description of the law is not sufficient. Please also revise the registration statement to affirmatively describe the tax consequences of the Business Combination that will be, as opposed to what ConocoPhillips and Marathon Oil "intend." If there is uncertainty regarding the tax treatment of the transactions, counsel may issue a "should" or "more likely than not" opinion to make clear that the opinion is subject to a degree of uncertainty, and explain why it cannot give a firm opinion. See Item 601(b)(8) of Regulation S-K and refer to Section III of Staff Legal Bulletin No. 19. 1.

COP answered
In response to the Staff’s comment, ConocoPhillips has filed, as Exhibits 8.1 and 8.2 to the Amended Registration Statement, revised tax opinions of Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, respectively.

ConocoPhillips further respectfully advises the Staff that it has revised disclosures on pages 8, 23, and 114-115 of the Amended Registration Statement. Read in the reply ↗

Also in this review: company letter, 2024-07-22

Other letters

Letters without questions

UPLOAD and CORRESP
13 other letters: notices that a filing will not be reviewed, requests to declare a registration effective, and the like

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 24 letters filed since 2019-05-09. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →