tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

CTASCintas

Industrials · Apparel · Nasdaq
Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

1 review of CTAS's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
1
latest letter 2008-04-10
Questions asked
1
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
1
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K

2008-04-10 to 2008-05-08 · 1 question · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
No closing letter
Executive pay
Item 11. Executive Compensation · Compensation Discussion and Analysis
SEC asked
We note your response to comment two of our letter dated January 25, 2008, we reissue the comment in part. We requested a quantitative discussion of all the terms of the necessary targets to be achieved for your named executive officers to earn their cash incentive bonuses and long-term equity incentives.
Rest of the question

In our prior letter, we noted that growth in earnings per share, sales growth, and other performance goals were used to determine executive incentive-based income. Your response indicates that disclosure of the earnings per share and sales growth thresholds would cause competitive harm to Cintas Corporation because it would allow “existing or future competitors … to gain or retain market share by reducing prices.” In particular we note that your actual EPS growth and sales growth for the company are known for fiscal 2007. Given that the actual growth in earning per share and growth in sales are known, please disclose the specific performance targets used to determine the incentive amounts or provide us with detailed discussion of how the disclosure of each specific target would cause the company competitive harm. Specifically address why the disclosure of the specific targets would cause competitors to reduce prices and gain or retain market share. Additionally, we note your response only discusses the earnings per share and sales growth targets. Supplementally advise us if there are any other quantitative “performance goals” used the company’s incentive-based compensation programs outside of the earnings per share and sales growth targets discussed in your response letter. * * * * * Closing Comments As appropriate, please respond to this comment within 10 business days or tell us when you will provide us with a response.

CTAS answered

No numbered answer found in the reply. Read the reply ↗

In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2008-05-08: 10-K filed 2008-07-30 ↗.

No earlier 10-K before the SEC's letter is in Tickdelta, so there is nothing to compare with.

Other letters

Letters without questions

UPLOAD and CORRESP
5 other letters: notices that a filing will not be reviewed, requests to declare a registration effective, and the like

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 21 letters filed since 2008-04-10. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →