tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

DOCHealthpeak Properties

Real estate · REIT · NYSE

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is a Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 company that owns, operates, and develops high-quality real estate focused on healthcare discovery and delivery in the United States (“U.S.”). 10-K, Item 1

Headquarters
Denver, CO
CEO
Scott M. Brinker
Next results
around Feb 1, 2027
Compare with peers → Embed

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. Below: what the staff asked DOC, and the company's answer to each question, quoted from the letters. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Schedule 14A

2022-08-31 to 2022-10-07 · 3 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2022-10-07
Controls
Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed March 17, 2022 · General
SEC asked (1)
Please expand your discussion of the reasons you believe that your leadership structure is appropriate, addressing your specific characteristics or circumstances. In your discussion, please also address the circumstances under which you would consider having the Chair and CEO roles filled by a single individual, when shareholders would be notified of any such change, and whether you will seek prior input from
Rest of the question

shareholders.

DOC answered
Healthpeak Properties, Inc. hereby submits this letter in response to the comment letter from the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) dated August 31, 2022. References to “we”, “our” or the “Company” in this response are to Healthpeak Properties, Inc. We acknowledge the Staff’s comments relating to: (1) the reasons we believe our Board’s leadership structure is appropriate given our specific characteristics or circumstances, and the circumstances under which we would consider having the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) roles filled by a single individual, when
Rest of the letter

stockholders would be notified of any such change, and whether we would seek prior input from stockholders; (2) the role that the Independent Chairman plays in the leadership of the Board, including whether the Independent Chairman may represent the Board in communications with stockholders and other stakeholders, or require Board consideration of, and/or override our CEO on, any risk matters; and (3) our Board’s administration of its risk oversight function, including the timeframe over which we evaluate risks and how we apply different oversight standards based upon the immediacy of the risk assessed, whether we consult with outside advisors and experts to anticipate future threats and trends, how often we re-assess our risk environment, how the Board interacts with management to address existing risks and identify significant emerging risks, whether we have a Chief Compliance Officer and to whom this position reports, and how our risk oversight process aligns with our disclosure controls and procedures. We respectfully advise the Staff that we currently have robust policies and practices relating to the topics raised by the Staff’s comments. As part of our ongoing corporate governance procedures and in light of the Staff’s comments, we plan to further assess our practices and disclosures with our Board at our upcoming quarterly meeting. Based on my conversation with Mr. Daniel Morris on August 18, 2022, we understand that the Staff is not seeking sample disclosures regarding these policies and practices or other detailed responses to the Staff’s comments at this time. However, as requested by the Staff, we hereby confirm that we will enhance the disclosures in the Company’s proxy statement next year in accordance with the topics above to more clearly address them, as well as any material developments to our risk oversight structure.

One letter for all the questions, without numbered answers. Read the reply ↗
Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed March 17, 2022 · General
SEC asked (2)
Please expand upon the role that your Independent Chairman plays in the leadership of the board. For example, please enhance your disclosure to address whether or not your Independent Chairman may: • represent the board in communications with shareholders and other stakeholders; or • require board consideration of, and/or override your CEO on, any risk matters.
DOC answered

See the reply above.

Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed March 17, 2022 · General
SEC asked (3)
Please expand upon how your board administers its risk oversight function. For example, please disclose: • the timeframe over which you evaluate risks (e.g., short-term, intermediate-term, or long-term) and how you apply different oversight standards based upon the immediacy of the risk assessed; • whether you consult with outside advisors and experts to anticipate future threats and trends, and how often you
Rest of the question

re-assess your risk environment; • how the board interacts with management to address existing risks and identify significant emerging risks; • whether you have a Chief Compliance Officer and to whom this position reports; and • how your risk oversight process aligns with your disclosure controls and procedures.

DOC answered

See the reply above.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2022-10-07

Form 10-K

2017-03-27 to 2017-04-18 · 3 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 0 from the company
Review closed 2017-04-18
SEC letter of 2017-03-27 ↗ no reply letter on EDGAR
Form 8-K filed February 13, 2017 · Exhibit 99.2
SEC asked (1)
We note your disclosure of Cash NOI and interest income on page 3. Please revise future filings to include a reconciliation of Cash NOI and interest income to the appropriate GAAP measure.
DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2017-03-27: 10-Q filed 2017-05-02 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-11-01 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Form 8-K filed February 13, 2017 · Exhibit 99.2
SEC asked (2)
We note your presentation of diluted FFO per common share, diluted FFO as adjusted per common share and comparable FFO as adjusted per common share, on page 3. Please revise your disclosure in future earnings supplements to include reconciliations for these measures or tell us where the related reconciliations have been included.
DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2017-03-27: 10-Q filed 2017-05-02 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-11-01 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Form 8-K filed February 13, 2017 · Exhibit 99.2
SEC asked (3)
On pages 40 and 47 we note that you present pro-rata share information for select line items and measures. Please revise future earnings supplements to include disclosure explaining how the various measures were derived.
DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2017-03-27: 10-Q filed 2017-05-02 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-11-01 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2017-04-18

Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015

2016-09-13 to 2016-10-28 · 6 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 0 from the company
Review closed 2016-10-28
Non-GAAP measuresResults discussion (MD&A)AcquisitionsLeasesLiquidity and cashSegments
SEC letter of 2016-09-13 ↗ no reply letter on EDGAR
Operations · Non-GAAP Financial Measures, page 42
SEC asked (1)
It appears that your measure of Funds Available for Distribution can be used as a non- GAAP liquidity measure. Please explain to us how you have considered question 102.05 of the C&DI related to Non-GAAP Financial Measures in drafting your Non-GAAP disclosures related to FAD. In particular, explain to us how you determined presentation of FAD on a per share basis would be appropriate in light of this guidance.
DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2016-09-13: 10-Q filed 2016-11-01 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-08-09 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Operations · Non-GAAP Financial Measures, page 42
SEC asked (2)
Please expand your disclosure to provide a more detailed discussion of the reasons why management believes the measures of FFO as adjusted and FAD are useful non-GAAP measures for investors.
DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2016-09-13: 10-Q filed 2016-11-01 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-08-09 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Segment NOI and Adjusted NOI, page 45
SEC asked (3)
Please tell us what consideration you have given to providing a discussion of the reason for changes in your non-same property portfolio (i.e. quantifying the change due to dispositions, redevelopment, acquisitions etc.).
DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2016-09-13: 10-Q filed 2016-11-01 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-08-09 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Note 3. Brookdale Lease Amendments and Terminations and the Formation of Two RIDEA · Joint Ventures (“Brookdale Transaction”), page 82
SEC asked (4)
Please clarify for us how you have accounted for the NNN Lease Restructuring and the basis for your conclusions. Cite any relevant accounting literature in your response. In your response, please explain to us whether you accounted for the transaction as the termination of the pre-existing lease and creation of a new lease, and how you determined the lease-related intangibles, initial direct costs and straight-line
Rest of the question

rent receivables associated with the previous leases should be amortized prospectively over the new lease term. Reference is made to ASC Topic 840-10-35-4.

DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2016-09-13: 10-Q filed 2016-11-01 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-08-09 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Note 3. Brookdale Lease Amendments and Terminations and the Formation of Two RIDEA · Joint Ventures (“Brookdale Transaction”), page 82
SEC asked (5)
Please provide us with a more detailed description of the effective offset of $53 million related to the NNN Lease Restructuring transactions. In your response explain to us how you have accounted for this portion of the transaction and the basis for your conclusions. Cite any relevant accounting literature in your response.
DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2016-09-13: 10-Q filed 2016-11-01 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-08-09 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Note 4. Other real estate property investments, page 85
SEC asked (6)
We note your disclosure of 2015 other real estate acquisitions. Please tell us why you did not include results of operations for these acquisitions in the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations numbers that you provided. Reference is made to ASC 805-10-50-3.
DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2016-09-13: 10-Q filed 2016-11-01 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-08-09 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2016-10-28

Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014

2015-03-19 to 2015-04-06 · 1 question · 1 letter from the SEC, 0 from the company
Review closed 2015-04-06
Non-GAAP measuresLiquidity and cash
SEC letter of 2015-03-19 ↗ no reply letter on EDGAR
Non-GAAP Financial Measures · Funds Available for Distribution, page 38
SEC asked
We note your disclosure appears to indicate that FAD is a liquidity measure as management views it as a supplemental measure which meaningfully measures the ability to fund ongoing dividend payments. Please tell us how you have met the reconciliation requirement under Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K as you have reconciled the amount to net income applicable to common shares through FFO as adjusted applicable to common
Rest of the question

shareholders. Additionally, please tell us how you determined it was appropriate to provide FAD per share within your filing in light of Question 102.5 of Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP financial measures.

DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2015-03-19: 10-Q filed 2015-05-05 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2014-11-04 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2015-04-06

5 other letters: notices that a filing will not be reviewed, requests to declare a registration effective, and the like

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 14 letters filed since 2015-03-19. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Work on DOC in a spreadsheet: Excel workbook (a sheet per section, ten years by column, charts, links to the filings) · CSV. For a Google Sheet that stays up to date, paste =IMPORTDATA("https://tickdelta.com/company/DOC/export.csv") into a cell.