tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

DOCHealthpeak Properties

Real estate · REIT · NYSE

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is a Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 company that owns, operates, and develops high-quality real estate focused on healthcare discovery and delivery in the United States (“U.S.”). 10-K, Item 1

Headquarters
Denver, CO
CEO
Scott M. Brinker
Next results
around Feb 1, 2027
Compare with peers → Embed

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. Below: what the staff asked DOC, and the company's answer to each question, quoted from the letters. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015

2016-09-13 to 2016-10-28 · 6 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 0 from the company
Review closed 2016-10-28
Non-GAAP measuresResults discussion (MD&A)AcquisitionsLeasesLiquidity and cashSegments
SEC letter of 2016-09-13 ↗ no reply letter on EDGAR
Operations · Non-GAAP Financial Measures, page 42
SEC asked (1)
It appears that your measure of Funds Available for Distribution can be used as a non- GAAP liquidity measure. Please explain to us how you have considered question 102.05 of the C&DI related to Non-GAAP Financial Measures in drafting your Non-GAAP disclosures related to FAD. In particular, explain to us how you determined presentation of FAD on a per share basis would be appropriate in light of this guidance.
DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2016-09-13: 10-Q filed 2016-11-01 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-08-09 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Operations · Non-GAAP Financial Measures, page 42
SEC asked (2)
Please expand your disclosure to provide a more detailed discussion of the reasons why management believes the measures of FFO as adjusted and FAD are useful non-GAAP measures for investors.
DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2016-09-13: 10-Q filed 2016-11-01 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-08-09 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Segment NOI and Adjusted NOI, page 45
SEC asked (3)
Please tell us what consideration you have given to providing a discussion of the reason for changes in your non-same property portfolio (i.e. quantifying the change due to dispositions, redevelopment, acquisitions etc.).
DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2016-09-13: 10-Q filed 2016-11-01 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-08-09 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Note 3. Brookdale Lease Amendments and Terminations and the Formation of Two RIDEA · Joint Ventures (“Brookdale Transaction”), page 82
SEC asked (4)
Please clarify for us how you have accounted for the NNN Lease Restructuring and the basis for your conclusions. Cite any relevant accounting literature in your response. In your response, please explain to us whether you accounted for the transaction as the termination of the pre-existing lease and creation of a new lease, and how you determined the lease-related intangibles, initial direct costs and straight-line
Rest of the question

rent receivables associated with the previous leases should be amortized prospectively over the new lease term. Reference is made to ASC Topic 840-10-35-4.

DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2016-09-13: 10-Q filed 2016-11-01 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-08-09 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Note 3. Brookdale Lease Amendments and Terminations and the Formation of Two RIDEA · Joint Ventures (“Brookdale Transaction”), page 82
SEC asked (5)
Please provide us with a more detailed description of the effective offset of $53 million related to the NNN Lease Restructuring transactions. In your response explain to us how you have accounted for this portion of the transaction and the basis for your conclusions. Cite any relevant accounting literature in your response.
DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2016-09-13: 10-Q filed 2016-11-01 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-08-09 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Note 4. Other real estate property investments, page 85
SEC asked (6)
We note your disclosure of 2015 other real estate acquisitions. Please tell us why you did not include results of operations for these acquisitions in the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations numbers that you provided. Reference is made to ASC 805-10-50-3.
DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2016-09-13: 10-Q filed 2016-11-01 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-08-09 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2016-10-28

Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014

2015-03-19 to 2015-04-06 · 1 question · 1 letter from the SEC, 0 from the company
Review closed 2015-04-06
Non-GAAP measuresLiquidity and cash
SEC letter of 2015-03-19 ↗ no reply letter on EDGAR
Non-GAAP Financial Measures · Funds Available for Distribution, page 38
SEC asked
We note your disclosure appears to indicate that FAD is a liquidity measure as management views it as a supplemental measure which meaningfully measures the ability to fund ongoing dividend payments. Please tell us how you have met the reconciliation requirement under Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K as you have reconciled the amount to net income applicable to common shares through FFO as adjusted applicable to common
Rest of the question

shareholders. Additionally, please tell us how you determined it was appropriate to provide FAD per share within your filing in light of Question 102.5 of Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP financial measures.

DOC answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2015-03-19: 10-Q filed 2015-05-05 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2014-11-04 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2015-04-06

5 other letters: notices that a filing will not be reviewed, requests to declare a registration effective, and the like

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 14 letters filed since 2015-03-19. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Work on DOC in a spreadsheet: Excel workbook (a sheet per section, ten years by column, charts, links to the filings) · CSV. For a Google Sheet that stays up to date, paste =IMPORTDATA("https://tickdelta.com/company/DOC/export.csv") into a cell.