tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

EXRExtra Space Storage

Real estate · REIT · NYSE

Extra Space Storage Inc. (“we,” “our,” “us” or the “Company”) is a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed as a Maryland corporation on April 30, 2004. 10-K, Item 1

Employees
8,393
Headquarters
Salt Lake City, UT
CEO
Joseph D. Margolis
Next results
around Feb 18, 2027
Compare with peers → Embed

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. Below: what the staff asked EXR, and the company's answer to each question, quoted from the letters. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K

2017-04-10 to 2017-04-19 · 3 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2017-04-19
Non-GAAP measuresAcquisitions
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 · Same-Store Results, page 33
SEC asked (1)
Please revise your reconciliation in future filings to begin with net income, the most directly comparable measure, ensuring that the non-GAAP measure does not receive undue prominence. See Question 102.10 of the updated Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations issued on May 17, 2016. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 4. Property Acquisitions and Dispositions, page 60
EXR answered

No numbered answer found in the reply. Read the reply ↗

In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2017-04-17: 10-Q filed 2017-05-05 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-11-04 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 · Same-Store Results, page 33
SEC asked (2)
We note that the amounts disclosed in the table for the number and value of OP Units issued during 2016 do not agree to the amounts disclosed in Note 13. Please tell us the actual number of OP Units issued during 2016 and the value of those units, and clarify or revise your disclosure in future filings.
Rest of the question

To the extent the value assigned to issued OP Units varies significantly, please tell us the reason for such variances.

EXR answered

No numbered answer found in the reply. Read the reply ↗

In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2017-04-17: 10-Q filed 2017-05-05 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-11-04 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Exhibit 99.1 · Outlook
SEC asked (3)
We note you provide certain non-GAAP same-store outlook numbers. In future Form 8- K 2.02 filings, please follow the guidance in C&DI Question 102.10 and provide the reconciliations required by Item 10(e)(1)(i) of Regulation S-K.
EXR answered

No numbered answer found in the reply. Read the reply ↗

In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2017-04-17: 10-Q filed 2017-05-05 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-11-04 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2017-04-19

Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015

2016-08-08 to 2016-08-16 · 3 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2016-08-16
Non-GAAP measures
Operations · Funds from Operations, page 43
SEC asked (1)
We note that your reconciliation to Funds from operations attributable to common stockholders begins with Net income attributable to common stockholders. However, the reconciliation adds back income allocated to Operating Partnership noncontrolling interests. It appears that your FFO measure represents FFO on a company-wide basis.
Rest of the question

Please clarify and/or revise your presentation and labeling of the measure in future filings to adequately reflect what is being presented.

EXR answered
Extra Space Storage Inc. (the "Company," "we," "us" and "our") submits this letter in response to the Staff’s comment letter dated August 8, 2016. For your convenience, we have set forth the Staff’s comment and the Company’s response for each item below. The Company acknowledges the following in regard to its filings: The Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its filings; Staff comments or changes to disclosures in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and The Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the
Rest of the letter

federal securities laws of the United States. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations We note that your reconciliation to Funds from operations attributable to common stockholders begins with Net income attributable to common stockholders. However, the reconciliation adds back income allocated to Operating Partnership noncontrolling interests. It appears that your FFO measure represents FFO on a company-wide basis. Please clarify and/or revise your presentation and labeling of the measure in future filings to adequately reflect what is being presented. We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and confirm that to more clearly define the FFO measure, we will relabel the total line to be “Funds from operations attributable to common stockholders and unit holders.” Please tell us how you have met all the disclosure requirements of Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K with regard to your disclosure of same-store net operating income. This comment should also be applied to the same-store presentation within your quarterly earnings release. We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and confirm that in future filings, we will update the disclosures, including by providing reconciliation of same-store net operating income to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, to comply with the disclosures required by Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K. We note that in your quarterly earnings release you focus on key non-GAAP financial measures more prominently than GAAP measures, which is inconsistent with the updated Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations issued on May 17, 2016 (specifically Question 102.10). Please review this guidance when preparing your next earnings release. We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and confirm that we will review the updated Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations issued on May 17, 2016 (including specifically Question 102.10) and update our disclosures accordingly in preparing our future earnings releases.

One letter for all the questions, without numbered answers. Read the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2016-08-12: 10-Q filed 2016-11-04 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-08-05 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Same-Store Results, page 43
SEC asked (2)
Please tell us how you have met all the disclosure requirements of Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K with regard to your disclosure of same-store net operating income. This comment should also be applied to the same-store presentation within your quarterly earnings release.
EXR answered

See the reply above.

In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2016-08-12: 10-Q filed 2016-11-04 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-08-05 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Form 8-K filed July 27, 2016 · Exhibit 99.1
SEC asked (3)
We note that in your quarterly earnings release you focus on key non-GAAP financial measures more prominently than GAAP measures, which is inconsistent with the updated Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations issued on May 17, 2016 (specifically Question 102.10). Please review this guidance when preparing your next earnings release.
EXR answered

See the reply above.

In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2016-08-12: 10-Q filed 2016-11-04 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-08-05 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2016-08-16

4 other letters: notices that a filing will not be reviewed, requests to declare a registration effective, and the like

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 13 letters filed since 2016-08-08. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Work on EXR in a spreadsheet: Excel workbook (a sheet per section, ten years by column, charts, links to the filings) · CSV. For a Google Sheet that stays up to date, paste =IMPORTDATA("https://tickdelta.com/company/EXR/export.csv") into a cell.