Form 10-K
Please revise your reconciliation in future filings to begin with net income, the most directly comparable measure, ensuring that the non-GAAP measure does not receive undue prominence. See Question 102.10 of the updated Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations issued on May 17, 2016. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 4. Property Acquisitions and Dispositions, page 60
No numbered answer found in the reply. Read the reply ↗
First report after the company's reply of 2017-04-17: 10-Q filed 2017-05-05 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-11-04 ↗.
Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.
We note that the amounts disclosed in the table for the number and value of OP Units issued during 2016 do not agree to the amounts disclosed in Note 13. Please tell us the actual number of OP Units issued during 2016 and the value of those units, and clarify or revise your disclosure in future filings.Rest of the question
To the extent the value assigned to issued OP Units varies significantly, please tell us the reason for such variances.
No numbered answer found in the reply. Read the reply ↗
First report after the company's reply of 2017-04-17: 10-Q filed 2017-05-05 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-11-04 ↗.
Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.
We note you provide certain non-GAAP same-store outlook numbers. In future Form 8- K 2.02 filings, please follow the guidance in C&DI Question 102.10 and provide the reconciliations required by Item 10(e)(1)(i) of Regulation S-K.
No numbered answer found in the reply. Read the reply ↗
First report after the company's reply of 2017-04-17: 10-Q filed 2017-05-05 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-11-04 ↗.
Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.
Also in this review: closing letter, 2017-04-19