tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

FCXFreeport-McMoRan

Materials · Mining · NYSE
Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

1 review of FCX's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
1
latest letter 2015-04-07
Questions asked
2
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
0
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2014

2015-04-07 to 2015-04-30 · 2 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2015-04-30
AcquisitionsReserves and insurance
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, page 137 · Note 2. Dispositions and Acquisitions, page 143
SEC asked (1)
We note your disclosures on page 144 related to the disposal of your Eagle Ford shale operations. Please disclose in future filings, the pre-tax profit or loss of this component for the period in which it was disposed and for all prior periods that are presented in the statement of operations to comply with ASC 360-10-50-3A(a) or tell us why you believe this guidance does not apply to you.
Rest of the question

Please provide your proposed disclosures in your response.

FCX answered
1: As disclosed in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, on page 139 of the 2014 Form 10-K, the Company follows the full cost method of accounting for its oil and gas properties. In connection with preparing the disclosures associated with the sale of the Eagle Ford shale assets, the Company evaluated the provisions of the ASC 360-10-50-3A(a), but concluded the guidance was not applicable based on the scope and scope exception provisions of ASC 205-20-15-3 and ASC 360-10-15-5(h), which provide that the Discontinued Operations and Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
Rest of the answer

Subtopics do not apply to oil and gas properties that are accounted for using the full cost method of accounting as prescribed by Regulation S-X, Rule 4-10.

The Company did include the disclosures required by ASC 360-10-50-3A(a) in the 2014 Form 10-K with respect to the disposition of its Candelaria and Ojos del Salado mining operations. The Company confirms that for any future disposals of individually significant non-oil and gas assets, it will include the disclosures required by ASC 360-10-50-3A(a).

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2015-04-08: 10-Q filed 2015-05-08 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2014-11-07 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Note 21. Supplementary Oil and Gas Information (Unaudited), page 202 · Proved Oil and Natural Gas Reserve Information, page 203
SEC asked (2)
We note your reference to “generally accepted engineering and evaluation principles.” While we understand that there are fundamentals of physics, mathematics and economics that are applied in the estimation of reserves, we are not aware of an official industry compilation of such “generally accepted engineering and evaluation principles.” Please explain to us the basis for concluding that such principles have been
Rest of the question

sufficiently established so as to judge that the reserve information has been prepared in conformity with such principles and refer us to a compilation of these principles. Alternatively, please confirm that you will not refer to “generally accepted engineering and evaluation principles” in future filings.

FCX answered
2: The Company confirms that it will not refer to “generally accepted engineering and evaluation principles” in its future filings. Instead, the Company will refer to its oil and gas reserve estimates being prepared in accordance with guidelines established by the Securities and Exchange Commission as prescribed by Regulation S-X, Rule 4-10.

________________________________________________________________

The Company represents to the Securities and Exchange Commission and its Staff that the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosures in its filings.
Rest of the answer

The Company further acknowledges that Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Securities and Exchange Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing. In addition, the Company will not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Securities and Exchange Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2015-04-08: 10-Q filed 2015-05-08 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2014-11-07 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2015-04-30

Other letters

Letters without questions

UPLOAD and CORRESP
3 other letters: notices that a filing will not be reviewed, requests to declare a registration effective, and the like

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 13 letters filed since 2013-05-28. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →