tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

LRCXLam Research

Technology · Industrial Machinery · Nasdaq
Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

1 review of LRCX's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
1
latest letter 2021-01-06
Questions asked
1
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
0
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K

2021-01-06 to 2021-01-19 · 1 question · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2021-01-19
Risk factorsLegal and contingenciesDerivatives and hedging
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed August 18, 2020 · Item 1A. Risk Factors, page 14
SEC asked
We note that your forum selection provision identifies the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the exclusive forum for certain litigation, including any “derivative action.” In future filings, please add a risk factor related to this provision and disclose whether this provision applies to actions arising under the Securities Act or Exchange Act.
Rest of the question

In that regard, we note that Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder, and Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. If the provision applies to Securities Act claims, please include disclosure in future filings that there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such provision and that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

LRCX answered
We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment. In our next Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we propose to include a risk factor related to our exclusive forum provision substantially as set forth below, and we intend to include a similar risk factor in future periodic reports so long as our bylaws continue to include this provision.

Our bylaws designate the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive judicial forum for certain legal actions between the Company and its stockholders, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims.

Our bylaws provide that,
Rest of the answer

unless we consent otherwise, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for lawsuits asserting certain stockholder claims (including claims asserted

January 15 2021

Page | 2 derivatively for our benefit), such as claims against directors and officers for breach of a fiduciary duty, claims arising under any provision of the General Corporation Law of Delaware or our certificate of incorporation or our bylaws, or claims governed by the internal affairs doctrine. This is a general summary of the bylaw provision; you should refer to the language of the bylaws for details. The forum provision does not apply to actions arising under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Securities Act of 1933, or related Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations.

As a Delaware corporation, Delaware law controls issues of our internal affairs, including duties that our directors, officers, employees, and others owe to the Company and its stockholders. We believe that our exclusive forum provision benefits us, and our stockholders, by permitting relatively prompt resolution of lawsuits concerning our internal affairs, promoting consistent application of Delaware law in these lawsuits, and reducing the possibility of duplicative, costly, multi-jurisdictional litigation with the potential for inconsistent outcomes. However, the forum provision limits a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it believes may be more favorable than Delaware, and this could discourage the filing of such lawsuits.

We hope that the foregoing is responsive to your comments. If you have any questions regarding the foregoing, please contact me at (510) 572-5156. Thank you for your assistance.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2021-01-15: 10-Q filed 2021-02-02 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2020-10-27 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2021-01-19

Other letters

Letters without questions

UPLOAD and CORRESP
2 other letters: notices that a filing will not be reviewed, requests to declare a registration effective, and the like

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 5 letters filed since 2015-12-16. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →