tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

Consumer staples · Tobacco · NYSE

MOAltria

Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

1 review of MO's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
1
latest letter Sep 7, 2018
Questions asked
2
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
0
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2017

2018-09-07 to 2018-09-27 · 2 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2018-09-27
Non-GAAP measuresResults discussion (MD&A)
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations · Expense (Income), Net Excluded from Adjusted Diluted EPS, page 16
SEC asked (1)
We note your discussion that adjusted diluted EPS for 2018 cannot be reconciled due to the highly variable nature of the forecast. However, we note from page 16 that you do disclose all amounts excluded from adjusted diluted EPS for 2017.
Rest of the question

Given your presentation of amounts excluded from adjusted diluted EPS, a non-GAAP measure, please revise to incorporate all disclosures required by Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K with regards to this measure for fiscal 2017 including a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure (diluted EPS).

MO answered
Altria acknowledges the Staff’s comment. To the extent applicable in future filings, Altria will provide all disclosures required by Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K, including a reconciliation of any historical non-GAAP financial measure (e.g., adjusted diluted EPS) to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure (e.g., diluted EPS). Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of Sep 18, 2018: 10-Q filed Oct 25, 2018 ↗, against the 10-Q filed Jul 26, 2018 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Exhibit 99.1, page 1
SEC asked (2)
We note your first statement concerning adjusted diluted EPS growth in the second quarter of 2018. In accordance with Item 100(A)(1) of Regulation G, please revise to balance your disclosure of growth in adjusted diluted EPS with the growth in the most comparable GAAP number, diluted EPS.
MO answered
Altria acknowledges the Staff’s comment; however, Altria believes Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K presents the GAAP and non-GAAP EPS measures in a balanced manner that is consistent with Item 100(a)(1) of Regulation G. In particular, the “Financial Performance” section on page 3 of Exhibit 99.1 sets forth for both the second quarter and first half of 2018, (i) the GAAP and non-GAAP EPS measures for the relevant period, (ii) the changes in the GAAP and non-GAAP EPS measures from the prior-year period and (iii) a discussion of the drivers of those period-to-period changes.
Rest of the answer

Moreover, Altria notes that it presents both the GAAP and non-GAAP EPS measures on page 1 of Exhibit 99.1 in the “Altria Headline Financials” table that appears below the statement in question. On both page 3 and page 1 of Exhibit 99.1, the GAAP presentation precedes the non-GAAP presentation. Altria also provides on page 3 of Exhibit 99.1 reconciliations of the GAAP EPS measure to the non-GAAP EPS measure.

Altria understands that the reference in the Comment Letter to the “first statement concerning adjusted diluted EPS growth” focuses on the first sentence in the statement of Altria’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer on quarterly performance. While this statement references a non-GAAP financial measure, Altria believes that this statement only represents high-level, general commentary on Altria’s second quarter performance in relation to its 2018 adjusted diluted EPS guidance. In fact, the statement provides important context for Altria’s modification to that guidance, which is also disclosed in Exhibit 99.1. Altria reiterates its belief, as noted above, that it presents the GAAP and non-GAAP EPS measures in a balanced manner that is consistent with Item 100(a)(1) of Regulation G through both the detailed disclosure on page 3 of Exhibit 99.1 and the table on page 1 of Exhibit 99.1 that appears below the statement in question.

If there is any additional information that we might provide to assist the Staff’s review, please call me at (804) 484-8280. Similarly, please let me know if you wish to discuss our responses.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of Sep 18, 2018: 10-Q filed Oct 25, 2018 ↗, against the 10-Q filed Jul 26, 2018 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2018-09-27

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 8 letters filed since 2016-04-27. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →