tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

MOAltria

Consumer staples · Tobacco · NYSE
Employees
5,900
Headquarters
Richmond, VA
CEO
Salvatore Mancuso
Next results
around Jan 28, 2027
Compare with peers → Embed

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. Below: what the staff asked MO, and the company's answer to each question, quoted from the letters. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2017

2018-09-07 to 2018-09-27 · 2 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2018-09-27
Non-GAAP measuresResults discussion (MD&A)
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations · Expense (Income), Net Excluded from Adjusted Diluted EPS, page 16
SEC asked (1)
We note your discussion that adjusted diluted EPS for 2018 cannot be reconciled due to the highly variable nature of the forecast. However, we note from page 16 that you do disclose all amounts excluded from adjusted diluted EPS for 2017.
Rest of the question

Given your presentation of amounts excluded from adjusted diluted EPS, a non-GAAP measure, please revise to incorporate all disclosures required by Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K with regards to this measure for fiscal 2017 including a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure (diluted EPS).

MO answered
Altria acknowledges the Staff’s comment. To the extent applicable in future filings, Altria will provide all disclosures required by Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K, including a reconciliation of any historical non-GAAP financial measure (e.g., adjusted diluted EPS) to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure (e.g., diluted EPS). Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2018-09-18: 10-Q filed 2018-10-25 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2018-07-26 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Exhibit 99.1, page 1
SEC asked (2)
We note your first statement concerning adjusted diluted EPS growth in the second quarter of 2018. In accordance with Item 100(A)(1) of Regulation G, please revise to balance your disclosure of growth in adjusted diluted EPS with the growth in the most comparable GAAP number, diluted EPS.
MO answered
Altria acknowledges the Staff’s comment; however, Altria believes Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K presents the GAAP and non-GAAP EPS measures in a balanced manner that is consistent with Item 100(a)(1) of Regulation G. In particular, the “Financial Performance” section on page 3 of Exhibit 99.1 sets forth for both the second quarter and first half of 2018, (i) the GAAP and non-GAAP EPS measures for the relevant period, (ii) the changes in the GAAP and non-GAAP EPS measures from the prior-year period and (iii) a discussion of the drivers of those period-to-period changes.
Rest of the answer

Moreover, Altria notes that it presents both the GAAP and non-GAAP EPS measures on page 1 of Exhibit 99.1 in the “Altria Headline Financials” table that appears below the statement in question. On both page 3 and page 1 of Exhibit 99.1, the GAAP presentation precedes the non-GAAP presentation. Altria also provides on page 3 of Exhibit 99.1 reconciliations of the GAAP EPS measure to the non-GAAP EPS measure.

Altria understands that the reference in the Comment Letter to the “first statement concerning adjusted diluted EPS growth” focuses on the first sentence in the statement of Altria’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer on quarterly performance. While this statement references a non-GAAP financial measure, Altria believes that this statement only represents high-level, general commentary on Altria’s second quarter performance in relation to its 2018 adjusted diluted EPS guidance. In fact, the statement provides important context for Altria’s modification to that guidance, which is also disclosed in Exhibit 99.1. Altria reiterates its belief, as noted above, that it presents the GAAP and non-GAAP EPS measures in a balanced manner that is consistent with Item 100(a)(1) of Regulation G through both the detailed disclosure on page 3 of Exhibit 99.1 and the table on page 1 of Exhibit 99.1 that appears below the statement in question.

If there is any additional information that we might provide to assist the Staff’s review, please call me at (804) 484-8280. Similarly, please let me know if you wish to discuss our responses.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2018-09-18: 10-Q filed 2018-10-25 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2018-07-26 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2018-09-27

Form 10-K

2016-04-27 to 2016-08-12 · 2 questions · 2 letters from the SEC, 2 from the company
Review closed 2016-08-12
Acquisitions
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements · Note 6. Investment in SABMiller, page 49
SEC asked
We note from you disclosure that following the closing of the acquisition, you expect to exchange your economic and voting interest in SABMiller for an interest that will be converted into Restricted Shares representing an approximate 10.5% economic and voting interest in NewCo. Further, we note that based on the structure, you expect to account for your investment in NewCo under the equity method of accounting.
Rest of the question

Please explain in further detail why you believe it is appropriate to account for your interest using the equity method of accounting in light of your disclosed economic and voting interest less than 20%. As part of your response, please explain why your investment will provide you with significant influence over the operating and financial policies of NewCo. Please refer to ASC 323-10-15-6.

MO answered
SUMMARY RESPONSE:

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 323-10-15-8 states that “[a]n investment of less than 20 percent of the voting stock of an investee shall lead to a presumption that an investor does not have the ability to exercise significant influence unless such ability can be demonstrated.” Under ASC 323-10-15-6 the “[a]bility to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of an investee may be indicated in several ways, including the following:

a.

Representation on the board of directors b.

Participation in policy-making processes c.

Material
Rest of the answer

intra-entity transactions d.

Interchange of managerial personnel e.

Technological dependency f.

Extent of ownership by an investor in relation to the concentration of other shareholdings (but substantial or majority ownership of the voting stock of an investee by another investor does not necessarily preclude the ability to exercise significant influence by the investor).”

After careful consideration of these indicia, Altria expects it will be able to demonstrate its ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of NewCo based on the following factors:

•

Altria expects to have an approximate 10.5% economic and voting interest in NewCo and to be NewCo’s largest shareholder other than Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV’s (“AB InBev”) Belgian and Brazilian stakeholders (such stakeholders collectively referred to as the “Shareholder Group”).

Altria expects to designate two active members to NewCo’s Board of Directors (the “NewCo Board”). Altria further expects membership on key NewCo Board committees. Through NewCo Board and committee membership, Altria will participate actively in, and have voting rights with respect to, matters reviewed and considered by the NewCo Board.

Boards of directors are responsible for establishing broad corporate policies. Through its NewCo Board and committee membership, Altria will undoubtedly participate actively in NewCo’s policy-making processes.

While the nine directors appointed by the Shareholder Group may vote as a combined controlling block, Altria expects that the views of, and positions taken by, its NewCo Board designees during NewCo Board and committee discussions and deliberations will, particularly in light of Altria’s position as the second largest shareholder of NewCo, be taken seriously into account by the other board and committee members in casting their votes. Thus, Altria believes that the fact that there will be nine directors appointed by the Shareholder Group will not impede Altria’s ability to exercise significant influence over NewCo’s operating and financial policies.

DISCUSSION:

Altria and its predecessor parent companies have been involved in the beer business since 1970, when Miller Brewing Company (“Miller”) was a wholly-owned Altria subsidiary. In 2002, Miller merged into South African Breweries plc to form SABMiller plc (“SABMiller”). In connection with that transaction, Altria received a minority ownership interest in SABMiller (accounted for under the equity method) and the right to appoint up to three members of the SABMiller Board of Directors (“SABMiller Board”). Altria’s current three designees on SABMiller’s sixteen member Board actively participate in SABMiller Board and committee meetings, providing guidance and leadership. Altria believes that the significant influence of these individuals is enhanced materially by the quality and extent of Altria’s consumer products company experience and history with the beer industry. Through this significant participation in the SABMiller Board and committee deliberative and decision-making processes and a minority ownership interest, Altria has the ability to significantly influence the operating and financial policies of SABMiller.

The proposed business combination between AB InBev and SABMiller under which Altria will exchange its existing interest in SABMiller for an interest in NewCo is structured to afford Altria the continued ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policy-making processes of the combined company, specifically through the combination of its approximate 10.5% voting interest and NewCo Board and committee representation. Altria’s irrevocable undertaking to elect a partial share alternative that includes NewCo Board representation, rather than a higher all cash offer, reflects Altria’s commitments to maintain its significant investment in the global beer industry and to preserve Altria’s ability to participate actively in and significantly influence decisions that will impact its anticipated multi-billion dollar investment in NewCo, given the importance of this investment to Altria’s shareholders. Additionally, Altria believes that AB InBev’s agreement to provide Altria with board representation is indicative of AB InBev’s recognition of Altria’s right to protect its interests by exercising influential leadership on the NewCo Board.

Altria’s appointed NewCo Board members, whom Altria presently expects to designate from among its senior executives, will serve that role in an engaged and fully participatory manner. Altria also expects its designees to be members of key NewCo Board committees. They will bring to NewCo extensive consumer products market experience and knowledge of the beer industry. Altria expects that its designees on the NewCo Board will operate in the same participatory, influential manner as its SABMiller Board designees have functioned for over a decade.1

A critical function of a corporate board is its role in establishing broad corporate policies. As described above, Altria’s designee directors on the NewCo Board will be fully immersed in NewCo Board and committee discussions and decisions. Based on its long history with the SABMiller Board, Altria has determined that this extent and quality of involvement in NewCo Board and committee matters will constitute participation in the NewCo policy-making process.

NewCo and Altria will also be party to certain agreements that will be significant to both parties. An information rights agreement will require NewCo to provide Altria with all information necessary to meet its financial reporting requirements as it pertains to an investment accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Under a tax matters agreement, NewCo will provide assistance and co-operation, and will give certain representations, covenants and indemnities to Altria with respect to tax matters. These agreements are further evidence of Altria’s significant involvement in material matters at NewCo.

The Shareholder Group currently holds an approximate 52% voting interest in AB InBev. Altria expects the Shareholder Group to hold a substantial, but less than majority, voting interest in NewCo of between 40% and 45%, and have the right to appoint nine of the fifteen members of the NewCo Board.

Altria’s recognition of the possibility that the nine directors appointed by the Shareholder Group may vote together on matters that come before the NewCo Board is based on a shareholder agreement among the Shareholder Group. While the shareholder agreement does not (and cannot under applicable law) require the NewCo Board members who represent the Shareholder Group to vote together on matters being voted upon by the NewCo Board, Altria conservatively assumes for purposes of this analysis that the nine directors may generally vote together on NewCo Board matters. This assumption reflects the provision of the shareholder agreement indicating that the Shareholder Group will, on matters being voted upon by NewCo shareholders, vote their shares as a combined block through 2034.2

_________________________

1 We note that board observer status alone generally provides an investor with the ability to exercise influence when the investor is able to obtain confidential materials and participate in decision-making discussions at board of directors meetings. See Consolidation and Equity Method of Accounting 2015, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Section 4.3.2.2. Altria’s representation on the NewCo Board will consist of full board membership, not only participating in NewCo Board meetings, but able to vote and hold committee memberships as well.

2 For a description of the shareholder agreement, see Shareholders’ Arrangements in Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions, in AB InBev’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, filed March 14, 2016. This shareholder agreement was extended until 2034. See AB InBev’s Form 6-K, dated April 12, 2016.

Based on its long SABMiller investment history and related board representation, Altria expects that the nine NewCo Board members appointed by the Shareholder Group will take into account, and can be significantly influenced by, the viewpoints of other NewCo shareholders and board members. This is particularly true of a shareholder like Altria with its significant anticipated ownership position in NewCo, board representation and the quality and extent of its consumer products company experience and history with the beer industry. Altria further identifies the possibility that there may be NewCo Board matters on which the Shareholder Group board representatives have differing views and might not vote as a block.

Additionally, Altria does not consider significant ownership by the Shareholder Group to impede Altria’s ability to exercise significant influence. ASC 323-10-15-6 (f) states that “substantial or majority ownership of the voting stock of an investee by another investor does not necessarily preclude the ability to exercise significant influence by the investor.” As noted above, the Shareholder Group will have less than a majority voting interest in NewCo. In addition, certain significant corporate actions such as amendments to NewCo’s Articles of Association will require a 75% supermajority vote, meaning they would require support of shareholders other than the Shareholder Group to become effective. Altria anticipates that it will be the largest shareholder in NewCo other than the Shareholder Group, by a significant margin, and therefore will be able to significantly influence the outcome of matters submitted to a vote of shareholders, especially (but not limited to) supermajority matters.

CONCLUSION:

In accordance with ASC 323-10-15-8, there is a presumption that an investor holding less than 20 percent of the voting stock of an investee does not have the ability to exercise significant influence, unless such ability can be demonstrated. Predominant evidence is not required to overcome this presumption. Although Altria will have an ownership interest of less than 20 percent of the voting stock of NewCo, Altria believes, based on the reasons set forth above and in Exhibit A of its May 6, 2016 response to the Original Comment Letter, that it will be able to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of NewCo.

As discussed at length above, Altria believes the combination of its significant 10.5% voting interest in NewCo, representation on the NewCo Board and its committees, participation in policy-making processes, and information and other contractual rights provides evidence of its ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of NewCo. Accordingly, Altria believes that it has sufficiently demonstrated that it will have the ability to exercise significant influence for purposes of applying the equity method of accounting for its investment in NewCo.

****

In addition, Altria acknowledges that:

Altria is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

Altria may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

If there is any additional information or materials that we might provide to assist the Staff’s review, please call me at (804) 484-8280. Similarly, please let me know if you wish to discuss our response.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2016-06-07: 10-Q filed 2016-07-27 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2015-10-29 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

SEC letter of 2016-05-25 ↗ no reply letter on EDGAR
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements · Note 6. Investment in SABMiller, page 49
SEC asked
We note your response to our prior comment 1 that you expect to have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of NewCo through the combination of your voting power and other factors including board and participation in policy-making processes.
Rest of the question

However, your expected ownership interest of less than 20 percent of the NewCo’s voting stock leads to a presumption that you do not have the ability to exercise significant influence unless you can demonstrate predominant evidence to the contrary. As such, please provide a more fulsome analysis as to why your board representation of either one or two board members will give you not just the ability to influence such policies, but to significantly influence them. In your analysis, please describe in more detail the basis to support your expectation that the nine directors appointed by AB InBev’s Belgian and Brazilian stakeholders will vote as a combined controlling block. Also, explain to us how the expectation affects your analysis in reaching your conclusion.

MO answered

No reply letter found.

In its next report

First report after the SEC's letter of 2016-05-25: 10-Q filed 2016-07-27 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2015-10-29 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: company letter, 2016-05-06, closing letter, 2016-08-12

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 8 letters filed since 2016-04-27. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Work on MO in a spreadsheet: Excel workbook (a sheet per section, ten years by column, charts, links to the filings) · CSV. For a Google Sheet that stays up to date, paste =IMPORTDATA("https://tickdelta.com/company/MO/export.csv") into a cell.