tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

MSIMotorola Solutions

Technology · Communications Equipment · NYSE

Motorola Solutions is a global leader in mission-critical safety and security technologies for public safety, government, including defense, and enterprise customers. 10-K, Item 1

Employees
23,000
Headquarters
Chicago, IL
CEO
Gregory Q. Brown
Next results
around Feb 10, 2027
Compare with peers → Embed

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. Below: what the staff asked MSI, and the company's answer to each question, quoted from the letters. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K For the Year Ended December 31, 2020

2021-04-29 to 2021-05-10 · 1 question · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2021-05-10
Non-GAAP measures
After reviewing your response to this comment, we may have additional comments. Exhibit 99.1
SEC asked
We note that you present outlook guidance for non-GAAP earnings per share without providing the reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure or the statement that providing such reconciliation requires unreasonable efforts.
Rest of the question

Refer to Question 102.10 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures and revise your future filings to provide the required information. In closing, we remind you that the company and its management are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of their disclosures, notwithstanding any review, comments, action or absence of action by the staff.

MSI answered
In Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed February 4, 2021, the Company states that it has not quantitatively reconciled its guidance for non-GAAP measurements because such a reconciliation is not available without unreasonable effort. Specifically, in the section of the Company’s earnings release titled “Use of Non-GAAP Financial Information,” the Company states the following:

“The company has not quantitatively reconciled its guidance for non-GAAP measurements under “Business Outlook” in this news release to their most comparable GAAP measurements because the company does not provide specific
Rest of the answer

guidance for the various reconciling items as certain items that impact these measures have not occurred, are out of the company’s control, or cannot be reasonably predicted. Accordingly, a reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP financial measurement is not available without unreasonable effort. Please note that the unavailable reconciling items could significantly impact the company’s results.”

We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comment and in response, our future filings will include the disclosure referenced above in a location of equal prominence as that of the Company’s guidance regarding non-GAAP earnings per share.

If the Staff has any further questions or comments concerning this response, or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact me at (847) 576-8367.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2021-05-04: 10-Q filed 2021-05-06 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2020-10-30 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2021-05-10

Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2017

2018-08-24 to 2018-10-04 · 1 question · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2018-10-04
Revenue
Financial Statements
SEC asked
Revenue from Contracts with Customers, page 10 1. For your devices, systems and systems integration solutions, please tell us the extent to which your contracts with customers include an obligation to provide updates to the software embedded in your hardware products.
Rest of the question

If applicable, please describe for us the terms associated with your obligation to provide updates and tell us how you considered the impact of this obligation on your allocation of transaction price and timing of revenue recognition.

MSI answered
Devices and system hardware sales include standard warranties that provide assurance to our customers that the hardware products and embedded software operate consistent with stated specifications and are free from defects. These standard warranties do not grant the customer the right to updates to the embedded software, nor do customers have the option to purchase standard warranties separately from the hardware products.

Accordingly, we account for standard warranties by accruing for expected warranty claims at the time of device and system hardware sales in accordance with ASC 460-10 and
Rest of the answer

as prescribed by ASC 606-10-55-32.

Customers may contract for services at the time of purchase of devices or systems and system integrations solutions or at a later date. As we disclose in Footnote 2 on page 12 of the 10-Q for the second quarter of 2018, “Services includes a continuum of service offerings beginning with repair, technical support and maintenance. More advanced offerings include: monitoring, software updates and cybersecurity services. [...] Services are both distinct and capable of being distinct in the context of the contract, representing a series of recurring services that the Company stands ready to perform over the contract term.” Customers that contract for services that grant the right to updates to future releases of software in hardware products obtain those rights on either an as available or specified basis.

Services that grant customers the right to unspecified software updates on an as available basis, represent a single performance obligation recognized overtime on a straight-line basis as the series of services are transferred. If the services are sold bundled with devices or system and system integration solutions, the contract transaction price is allocated to the services performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis as prescribed by ASC 606-10-32-29. We estimate standalone selling price for the Company’s unspecified software updates based on an analysis of observable sale transactions.

Separately, a customer’s right to a specified software update represents a distinct performance obligation that is recognized at the point in time control is transferred or over time using an input measure of costs incurred based on the level of customization and integration required on the underlying software update. Similar to the allocation for services, revenue is allocated to the specified update performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis using an estimated selling price based on an analysis of observable sale transactions.

If the Staff has any further questions or comments concerning this response, or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact me at (847) 576-4047.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2018-09-06: 10-Q filed 2018-11-02 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2018-08-03 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2018-10-04

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 6 letters filed since 2018-08-24. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Work on MSI in a spreadsheet: Excel workbook (a sheet per section, ten years by column, charts, links to the filings) · CSV. For a Google Sheet that stays up to date, paste =IMPORTDATA("https://tickdelta.com/company/MSI/export.csv") into a cell.