NXPINXP Semiconductors

Where you describe two or more business reasons that contributed to a material change in a financial statement line item between periods, please quantify, where possible, the extent to which each change contributed to the overall change in that line item. As an example, we note that you attribute the change in gross profit on page 36 to a number of partially offsetting factors.

Rest of the question

See Item 303(a) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release No. 33-8350. Table 4: Financial Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Results (unaudited), page 8

The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and we confirm that in future filings, when we describe two or more business reasons that contributed to a material change in a financial statement line item between periods, we will quantify, where possible, the extent to which each factor contributed to the overall change in that line item.

Table 4: Financial Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Results (unaudited), page 8

1.Your presentation in this table gives the appearance of a full non-GAAP income statement.

Rest of the answer

Please note that the presentation of a full non-GAAP income statement, or a presentation that gives the appearance of one, may place undue prominence on the non-GAAP information and give the impression that the non-GAAP income statement represents a comprehensive basis of accounting. Confirm to us that you will not present full non-GAAP consolidated income statements or their equivalents in future filings. Refer to Question 102.10(a) and (c) of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

Response: The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and we confirm that we will revise the referenced table in future filings so that the presentation of the reconciliation tables do not resemble a full non-GAAP income statement. The following reflects the revised presentation as applied to the GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations for Form 8-K filed July 25, 2023 (the “Q2 2023 Earnings Release”).

Q2 2023 Earnings Release Non-GAAP Reconciliations Revised Presentation

Table 4: Financial Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP Results (unaudited)

($ in millions)

Three months ended

July 2, 2023

April 2, 2023

July 3, 2022

GAAP Gross Profit

$ 1,881 $ 1,770 $ 1,882

PPA Effects

(14) (13) (14)

Restructuring

— 2 3

Share-based compensation

(13) (13) (12)

Other incidentals

(18) (22) (10)

Non-GAAP Gross Profit

$ 1,926 $ 1,816 $ 1,915

GAAP Gross margin

57.0 % 56.7 % 56.8 %

Non-GAAP Gross margin

58.4 % 58.2 % 57.8 %

GAAP Research and development

$ (589) $ (577) $ (542)

— (14) 1

(51) (52) (45)

(1) (1) (3)

Non-GAAP Research and development

$ (537) $ (510) $ (495)

GAAP Selling, general and administrative

$ (274) $ (280) $ (265)

PPA effects

— (1) (1)

— (6) —

(38) (34) (32)

(2) (21) (3)

Non-GAAP Selling, general and administrative

$ (234) $ (218) $ (229)

GAAP Operating income (loss)

$ 937 $ 825 $ 943

(95) (99) (149)

— (18) 4

(102) (99) (89)

(21) (44) (16)

Non-GAAP Operating income (loss)

$ 1,155 $ 1,085 $ 1,193

GAAP Operating margin

28.4 % 26.4 % 28.5 %

Non-GAAP Operating margin

35.0 % 34.8 % 36.0 %

GAAP Income tax benefit (provision)

$ (158) $ (118)

Income tax effect

22 49

Non-GAAP Income tax benefit (provision)

$ (180) $ (167)

GAAP Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders

$ 698 $ 615

(95) (99)

— (18)

(102) (99)

(21) (44)

Other adjustments

20 41

Non-GAAP Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders

$ 896 $ 834

GAAP net income (loss) per common share attributable to stockholders – diluted

$ 2.67 $ 2.35

(0.37) (0.38)

— (0.07)

(0.39) (0.38)

(0.08) (0.17)

0.08 0.16

Non-GAAP net income (loss) per common share attributable to stockholders - diluted

$ 3.43 $ 3.19

If the Staff has any questions or requires any additional information regarding the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact me at +31 40 2729999.

Read in the reply ↗

Your presentation in this table gives the appearance of a full non-GAAP income statement. Please note that the presentation of a full non-GAAP income statement, or a presentation that gives the appearance of one, may place undue prominence on the non- GAAP information and give the impression that the non-GAAP income statement represents a comprehensive basis of accounting.

Rest of the question

Confirm to us that you will not present full non-GAAP consolidated income statements or their equivalents in future filings. Refer to Question 102.10(a) and (c) of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

No numbered answer found in the reply. Read the reply ↗

The disclosure indicates that members of the NXP Board present at the meeting duly and unanimously recommended that NXP shareholders accept the Offer. Item 4 of Schedule 14D-9 and corresponding Item 1012(a) of Regulation M-A, as well as Rule 14e-2(a) of Regulation 14E, require that the “filing person” and “subject company,” respectively, provide the required disclosures.

Rest of the question

Please revise to expressly state the subject company’s position with respect to the offer or alternatively clarify that the Board’s recommendation is being made on behalf of NXP. See Item 1000(f) of Regulation M-A for a definition of the term “subject company” in the context of Regulation M-A.

The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and respectfully advises the

Staff that it considered the requirements of Rule 100(a)(2) of Regulation G, which provides that the reconciliation of non-GAAP financial information shall be quantitative for forward-looking information to the extent available without unreasonable efforts.

Rest of the answer

Below please find a brief legal analysis explaining why the Company believes that such a reconciliation would not be possible without unreasonable efforts.

Stock Based Compensation Expense

Stock based compensation expense for future periods would be particularly difficult for the Company to quantify without unreasonable efforts. The analysis would be particularly complicated and speculative as it would require the Company to project its future outstanding equity awards, which are contingent upon future grants to existing employees and future levels of hiring over a six-year period, the types of personnel hired, the types and amounts of equity compensation awards that would be necessary for existing employees and new hire grants, the vesting and timing of such awards and the then-current trading price of the Company’s shares (the “Shares”). It would also be impracticable without unreasonable efforts for the Company to forecast the various inputs in the calculation of the stock based compensation expense for each of these awards under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation” (“ASC

718”). For example, this would require, among other things, speculation regarding the then-current trading price of the Shares and the factors pertinent to the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model such as assumptions as to volatility of the trading price of the Shares over the term of the awards, the expected term of the awards, the risk-free interest rate and the award forfeiture rate, in order to determine the fair value of the awards on the grant dates and amortize that expense over the respective vesting periods. The Company would also be required to forecast the amount and timing of employee equity award exercises to estimate the employer payroll tax associated with stock based compensation, which exercises are entirely dependent on the behavior of individual award holders.

Merger-Related Costs

Merger-related costs are inherently difficult to project because they vary widely in both amount and frequency, and future expenses will be significantly impacted by the current ongoing integration of Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd. (“Freescale”) in addition to the timing and nature of the Company’s potential future acquisitions (if any). The acquisition of Freescale closed on December 7, 2015 (the “Freescale Acquisition”). In Item 4, section B (page 20) of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 filed with the SEC on

February 26, 2016 (the “2015 Form 20-F”), the Company included the disclosure below about the Freescale integration:

Integration planning commenced shortly after the announcement of the Merger in March 2015. We expect the full integration process to take several years, with the initial focus on management consolidation and process integration. Work streams are underway in all of our business lines and the support functions. Integration activities that likely will have a multi-year horizon include, but are not limited to, harmonizing brands, product and vendor selections, system integration and supply chain integration.

The priorities are maintaining business and customer continuity while identifying and accelerating synergies and integrating organizations, processes and systems.

The integration activities will transform the way NXP operates over the next few years. The remaining discussion in this

“Business” section addresses the way we operate currently; however, the integration is likely to significantly impact most of these processes in future periods.

As such, estimating future merger-related costs would therefore require the Company to speculate about yet to be finalized ongoing strategic planning in relation to Freescale that will continue over the next several years. In addition, the Company would need to speculate about the occurrence of any potential future acquisitions. Although the Company continues to monitor and formalize integration plans for Freescale, there is still additional work to be done and significant decisions to be made with respect to harmonizing the two brands, product and vendor selections, system integration and supply chain integration that will likely require the Company to incur significant costs that it could not reasonably estimate at this time. In addition, the Company regularly evaluates potential acquisitions, but the decision whether to pursue a particular transaction depends on a large number of factors, which makes the occurrence and timing of future acquisitions impracticable to predict without unreasonable efforts. The Company would also have to speculate about the amount and timing of the merger-related costs that would be associated with those uncertain future acquisitions, which would be particularly challenging given that the amount and timing of those expenses often vary widely from one acquisition to another.

Purchase Price Accounting Effects; Amortization Expense of Acquisition-Related Intangibles

Purchase price accounting effects and the expense associated with the amortization of acquisition-related intangibles vary widely in amount and frequency and could be significantly impacted by the completion or abandonment of the research and development efforts related to the approximately $2 billion of in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) that the

Company acquired from Freescale. Purchase price accounting effects and the expense associated with the amortization of acquisition-related intangibles could also be impacted by the timing and nature of the Company’s potential future acquisitions (if any). During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company completed its valuation procedures related to the acquired IPR&D as well as other assets and liabilities. IPR&D is an indefinite lived asset until the completion or abandonment of the associated research and development effort. IPR&D will be amortized over an estimated useful life to be determined at the date the associated research and development effort is completed, or expensed immediately when, and if, the project is abandoned. Acquired IPR&D is not amortized during the period that it is considered indefinite lived, but rather is subject to annual testing for impairment or when there are indicators for impairment. Estimating the potential completion of the research and development or the ultimate abandonment of IPR&D would require the Company to speculate about the nature and timing of the associated amortization or impairment charges and such amortization and impairment charges could have a significant effect on the operating results of the Company. Assuming all of the projects were completed in the same fiscal year and assuming the estimated useful life was in-line with the estimated useful life of other developed technology the Company acquired from Freescale, there could be additional amortization expense of up to $400 million in any annual period presented in the Projections. In addition, estimating future expenses relative to future acquisitions would require the Company to speculate about the occurrence of the Company’s future acquisitions, which, as noted above, is inherently uncertain. The Company would also have to speculate about the value of the intangible assets to be acquired in connection with those uncertain future acquisitions, the time periods over which the value of those assets would be amortized and the related rates of amortization. The Company, in recent years, has completed acquisitions ranging from $10 million to $11.6 billion. Given that the value and nature of acquired intangibles varies widely from one acquisition to another it would be impracticable to estimate the value and related amortization of any potential future acquisition with any degree of reasonable reliability.

Asset Impairment Charges

The Company records goodwill and intangible impairment charges when the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair values. The timing of such impairment charges is very difficult to predict, and the amounts of those charges are determined through a complex valuation analysis that cannot be forecasted with any reasonable reliability. For the nine month period ended October 2, 2016, the Company recognized impairment charges of $89 million, for the years ended December 31, 2011 through

2015, impairment charges were nil. The Freescale Acquisition has significantly impacted the potential magnitude of any future impairment charges and the approximately $2 billion of acquired IPR&D from Freescale could result in the abandonment of projects that would result in significant impairment charges. Estimating future impairment charges would therefore require the Company to speculate regarding the future fair values of its goodwill and intangible assets.

Restructuring Charges

In recent years, the Company has recognized a wide range of restructuring charges. For example, for the years ended December 31, 2011 through 2015, the Company recognized restructuring charges of $81 million, $111 million, $40 million, $57 million and $264 million, for various restructuring activities ranging from small targeted initiatives to significant changes in structure. The Company may in the future determine to exit certain facilities and/or restructure its operations, each of those decisions being independent from one another. Additionally, as a result of the Freescale Acquisition, it is possible that future restructuring activity may increase significantly compared to historical restructuring activities. The amount and timing of the restructuring charges (and any reversals of charges recorded in prior periods) associated with these activities are wholly dependent upon the nature and timing of those restructuring activities. Restructuring charges could include, among other things, headcount reductions and associated severance and benefits cost, exit costs associated with closing office space or other locations and other contract cancellation charges, all of which are highly dependent upon the details of the particular restructuring activities. Estimating future restructuring charges (and reversals of charges) would require the Company to speculate about the occurrence and timing of future restructuring activities, which are both inherently uncertain. Moreover, the Company would have to speculate about the magnitude of the charges associated with those uncertain future restructuring activities, which would be even more difficult to estimate with any reasonable reliability.

Gains or Losses Related to Sales of Assets

In recent years, the Company has recognized a wide range of gains or losses related to sales of assets. For example, for the years ended

December 31, 2011 through 2015, the Company recognized gains or (losses) related to sales of assets of $(10) million, $20 million, $2 million, $10 million and $1,263 million. From time to time, the Company may decide to sell certain of its assets for strategic reasons. Gains or losses on such sales have been inconsistent in amount and frequency, and future gains or losses will be significantly impacted by the timing and nature of the Company’s decisions to conduct sales of its assets. The value of the Company’s assets substantially increased as a result of the Freescale Acquisition, so the Company cannot rely on historical gains and losses to estimate future gains and losses. Estimating future gains and losses would therefore require the Company to speculate about the timing of these future asset sales and the assets involved in any such sales, both of which are inherently uncertain. It would be impracticable to quantify with any reasonable reliability the book value of the relevant assets and the value to be received for such assets in order to determine the associated amount of the gain or loss on such sale.

The probable significance of each of the foregoing line items is high, as is the variability of these items from one period to another. As a result, though it was possible to forecast Non-GAAP Gross Margin, EBITDA, Non-GAAP Operating Margin, Non-GAAP Operating Income and Unlevered Free Cash Flow for the forecast period, it would be impracticable without unreasonable efforts to forecast the most comparable GAAP financial measures with any degree of reasonable reliability due to the variability and volatility of these components of the reconciliation. In addition, any attempt to reconcile these items would be misleading to the

Company’s shareholders for the reasons described above and especially in light of the fact that neither the NXP Board nor Qatalyst relied on any such reconciliation.

Therefore, because the reconciliation of the forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures presented to the most comparable GAAP financial measures cannot be created without unreasonable efforts, and would be misleading to the Company’s shareholders, for the reasons described above, the Company respectfully resubmits that such reconciliation is not required in accordance with Rule 100(a)(2) of Regulation G.

Read in the reply ↗

We noticed the disclosure that the “NXP Board considered certain factors…” Item 4 of Schedule TO and corresponding Item 1012(b) of Regulation M-A, however, require that reasons, as distinguished from factors, be disclosed. Note also that conclusory statements are not considered sufficient disclosure. Please revise. Item 8. Additional Information (d) Certain NXP Management Projections, page 44

In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has revised its disclosure. Please refer to Amendment No. 3. Read in the reply ↗

We note this section appears to include non-GAAP financial measures. Please revise to provide the disclosure required by Rule 100 of Regulation G.

As explained above in response to the Staff’s first comment, the Company is unable to quantify merger-related costs and purchase price accounting adjustments without unreasonable efforts. Merger-related costs and purchase price accounting adjustments vary widely in amount and frequency and are significantly impacted by the timing and nature of the Company’s potential future acquisitions (if any) and these items have also been impacted by the Freescale Acquisition.

Rest of the answer

As noted above, given the uncertainty regarding the completion or abandonment of projects associated with the approximately $2 billion of IPR&D acquired from Freescale, it would be impracticable to estimate future merger-related costs and purchase price accounting adjustments based on historical acquisitions with any degree of reliability or certainty. Effects of future acquisitions are not reflected in the Company’s forecasted operating results. The Company would also have to speculate about the amount and timing of the acquisition, integration expenses to quantify merger-related costs and the value of intangible assets to quantify purchase price accounting adjustments, that would each be associated with those uncertain future acquisitions. This would be particularly challenging given that the amount and timing of such expenses and the value and nature of acquired intangibles often varies widely from one acquisition to another.

As explained above in response to the Staff’s first comment, expense associated with the amortization of acquisition-related intangibles varies widely in amount and frequency and is significantly impacted by the timing and nature of the Company’s potential future acquisitions (if any) and acquisition-related intangibles acquired in the Freescale Acquisition. To estimate future expenses, the Company would need to speculate about the occurrence of the Company’s future acquisitions and acquisition-related intangibles acquired in the Freescale Acquisition, which, as noted above, is inherently uncertain.

Per the Staff’s request, below please find the tabular disclosure that was included in Note 5, Identified Intangible Assets of the 2015 Form 20-F. The Company respectfully requests the Staff to refer to the description of the IPR&D above and please note that the table below does not contemplate IPR&D which could impact any period presented by an amount up to approximately $400 million, or 26% of the estimated amortization for 2017.

The estimated amortization expense for these identified intangible assets, excluding software, for each of the five succeeding years is:

Read in the reply ↗

We note your statement on page 48 that “[n]either the Company nor any of its affiliates assumes any responsibility to holders of Shares for the accuracy of this information.” You may not disclaim responsibility for your disclosure given the attestation that accompanies the signature on the schedule. Please revise.

Rest of the question

See Rule 14d-102, which rule makes clear that the person signing the Schedule 14D-9 is representing, after due inquiry and to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that the information set forth in the schedule is true, complete and correct.

No numbered answer found in the reply. Read the reply ↗

We note your response to our prior comment 3 from our letter dated November 22, 2016. We are continuing to evaluate the applicability of Rule 100 of Regulation G to the financial projection disclosures provided by NXP.

Rest of the question

The response, dated December 2, 2016, contends that a reconciliation of the financial projection information previously disclosed, if undertaken in accordance with Rule 100(a)(2) of Regulation G, would be “unreasonable.” For each of the items excluded when determining the non-GAAP financial measures that you list on page 3 of your response letter, please provide us with a brief but substantive legal analysis that supports NXP’s stated belief that reconciliation would be “unreasonable.”

No reply letter found.

The response letter stated that “[t]hese items cannot be reliably quantified due to the combination of variability and volatility of such components and may, depending on the size of the components, have a significant impact on the reconciliation.” The final rule release in which Regulation G was adopted explained the registrant must identify information that is unavailable and disclose its probable significance.”

Rest of the question

The revised disclosure does not address the “probable significance” of the information effectively asserted as being unavailable. Please revise or advise.

No reply letter found.

Please explain why merger-related costs and purchase price accounting adjustments are unable to be quantified, even if qualified as an estimate. To the extent such costs and adjustments relate to past acquisitions, it appears that they could be estimated.

Rest of the question

Conversely, if such costs and adjustments relate to possible future acquisitions during the forecasted period, please explain to us whether the effects of those future acquisitions are reflected in your forecasted operating results. Please provide us with the same type of summary analysis for expenses associated with the amortization of acquisition-related intangibles. In addition, please provide us with a brief explanation as to whether or not asset impairment charges and gains or losses related to sales of assets may be estimated to the extent such amounts could become known during the forecasted period. If asset impairment and/or asset charges are not anticipated, please consider revising the disclosure to so state. The company and its management remain responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of their disclosures notwithstanding any review, comments, action or inaction by the staff.

No reply letter found.

We have reviewed and considered the revised disclosure provided in Amendment No. 3 to NXP’s Schedule 14D-9, and the corresponding written responses dated December 19, 2016 submitted in reply to our comments dated December 8, 2016.

Rest of the question

With the exception of the analysis and conclusions offered with respect to (1) stock-based compensation and (2) restructuring charges, we are unable to concur with the analysis and conclusions that relate to the other accounting measures referenced in your response letter. It does not appear to us that unreasonable efforts would be required to produce a reconciliation of those measures. Without expressing an opinion as to whether or not the disclosures within the Schedule 14D-9, including the amendments thereto, are compliant with Rule 100(a) of Regulation G, or a whether or not a reconciliation still needs to be undertaken, we will not issue any further comments concerning compliance with Rule 100(a) at this time. The company and its management remain responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of their disclosures notwithstanding any review, comments, action or inaction by the staff.

No reply letter found.

We note from page 35 that you reversed $51 million related to an accounts receivable valuation allowance for the collection of accounts receivable amounts following a legal award and that the reversal impacted your gross profit. Please explain to us the nature of the legal award that you received and why you reversed your valuation allowance. Please also explain to us why the reversal impacted your gross profit.

No reply letter found.

Please revise future filings to include a description of your exit or disposal activities, including the facts and circumstances leading to the expected activities and the expected completion date, consistent with FASB ASC 420-10-50-1(a). Please revise your MD&A in future filings to include all of the disclosures required by SAB Topic 5.P.4.

No reply letter found.

Please explain to us the nature of the loss you recorded of $46 million during fiscal year 2012 for extra provisions for litigation, claims and proceedings related to your equity investments.

No reply letter found.

Further, please explain to us the nature of the results relating to equity-accounted investees for the three months ended March 31, 2013 of $47 million shown in your Form 6-K dated April 23, 2013. If different, please also discuss and quantify the net benefit of the release of the legal provision in the three months ended March 31, 2013.

No reply letter found.

We note on page 2 that you present forward looking non-GAAP financial measures for the second quarter of 2013. Please revise future filings to include, to the extent available without unreasonable efforts, the reconciliations required by Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K.

No reply letter found.