OUTFRONT Media Inc. OUT
1 fact worth reading about, 9 checks with nothing to note
10-K, 8-K and filing indexFacts from the latest 10-K that are worth reading about. They are not a verdict on the company.
What each check found
Each one cites its filing
-
Receivables growing faster than revenueReceivables +19.8% ($305.3M to $365.7M) vs revenue +0.0% ($1.8B to $1.8B), +19.7 pts apart
-
Cash from operations lower than net incomeCash from operations $307.6M vs net income $147.0M (FY ending Dec 31, 2025)
-
Auditor changeSame auditor in both 10-Ks: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPSource: 10-K 0001579877-26-000008: auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP; 10-K 0001579877-25-000034: auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP; no 8-K item 4.01 in the last 2 years
-
Going concern languageNo statement of substantial doubt about going concern
-
Restatement (8-K item 4.02)No 8-K item 4.02 in the last 2 yearsSource: Filing index, 8-Ks since Nov 15, 2024
-
Late filing notice (NT 10-K or NT 10-Q)No NT 10-K or NT 10-Q in the last 2 yearsSource: Filing index since Nov 15, 2024
-
Critical audit matters changedThe same matters as last year: Revenue Recognition - Billboard and Transit
-
Material weakness in internal controlNo sentence in the 10-K concludes that controls were not effective because of a material weakness
-
Material impairment (8-K item 2.06)No 8-K item 2.06 in the last 2 yearsSource: Filing index, 8-Ks since Nov 15, 2024
-
Bankruptcy (8-K item 1.03)No 8-K item 1.03 in the last 2 yearsSource: Filing index, 8-Ks since Nov 15, 2024
-
Inventory growing faster than revenue not applicableThe 10-K does not report inventory for both years.
Did the profit turn into cash?
Net income against operating cash flow, FY2016 to FY2025 · 10-K XBRL
Over 10 years, every $1 of net income came with $4.22 of operating cash flow. Cash matched or beat profit every year.
Ratios over five years
Trends · the 10-K's own numbers
Each ratio is worked out from the 10-K's own numbers; hover a value for its source. The small grey figure under each value (“peers”) is the median of 9 companies in the same peer group, for the same fiscal year. The line at the right shows the company (solid) against the peer median (dashed) on one scale. A ratio that moves is a reason to read the filing, not a verdict.
| Ratio | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days of sales in receivables Receivables / revenue x 365 How long customers take to pay. A rise means sales are being booked faster than cash arrives. | 77 peers - | 65 peers - | 58 peers - | 61 peers - | 73 peers - | |
| Cash from operations / net income Cash from operations / net income (only when net income is above zero) Near or above 1.0x means profit arrives as cash. Well below it for years means profit is sitting in receivables, stock or estimates. | 2.78x peers 1.85x | 1.78x peers 2.09x | - peers 1.76x | 1.16x peers 2.45x | 2.09x peers 1.92x | |
| Accruals ratio (Net income - cash from operations) / average total assets The part of profit that is not cash, as a share of the balance sheet. Higher means more of the profit rests on accounting estimates. | −1.1% peers −3.2% | −1.9% peers −4.1% | −11.7% peers −3.5% | −0.8% peers −4.5% | −3.1% peers −3.1% | |
| SG&A / revenue Selling, general and administrative expense / revenue Overhead per dollar of sales. A sudden fall can come from cutting costs, or from moving costs elsewhere. | 25.2% peers 7.6% | 23.8% peers 6.9% | 23.6% peers 7.7% | 24.5% peers 6.8% | 24.1% peers 6.2% |
Published score, FY2025
Published formulas · 10-K line items
Academic formulas, worked out from this company's 10-K numbers. They describe a pattern in the figures; they do not say what the company did, and they are not a view on the shares. Every input is a line item from the filing.
One point for each test the company passes. The paper used it on low price-to-book companies; here it is shown as a summary of the year's financial direction.
The tests
| Return on assets is positiveNet income / assets at the start of the year, above zero. | ✓ 1 |
|---|---|
| Cash from operations is positiveOperating cash flow above zero. | ✓ 1 |
| Return on assets roseThis year's return on assets above last year's. | – 0 |
| Cash from operations exceeds net incomeOperating cash flow / assets above return on assets. | ✓ 1 |
| Long-term debt fell relative to assetsLong-term debt / average assets lower than last year. | – 0 |
| Current ratio roseCurrent assets / current liabilities above last year's. | ✓ 1 |
| No new shares issuedDiluted share count not above last year's (the paper tests for an equity offering). | ✓ 1 |
| Gross margin rose(Revenue - cost of revenue) / revenue above last year's. | n/a |
| Asset turnover roseRevenue / assets at the start of the year above last year's. | ✓ 1 |
What it does not mean: a low score is not a prediction of a fall, and a high score is not a reason to buy. A test the XBRL could not support is shown as n/a and left out of the total.
How each check works
what it measures, the threshold, what it does not mean
| Check | What it measures | When it is marked | What it does not mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Receivables growing faster than revenue | Whether customers owe more, relative to sales, than a year ago. | Receivables grew more than 10 percentage points faster than revenue, and grew. | Not proof that revenue is overstated. A large deal at year end, longer payment terms or an acquisition can do the same. |
| Cash from operations lower than net income | Whether reported profit is backed by cash from the business. | Cash from operations is below net income. Not computed for banks and other financial companies. | Common in fast-growing or seasonal companies. It is a question to ask, not a failure. |
| Inventory growing faster than revenue | Whether stock is piling up relative to sales. | Inventory grew more than 10 percentage points faster than revenue, and grew. | May be a planned build ahead of a product launch or a supply-chain change. |
| Auditor change | Whether the company changed its auditor. | An 8-K item 4.01 in the last 2 years, or a different auditor name in the two latest 10-Ks. | Often routine: rotation, a tender, or an audit firm merger. |
| Going concern language | Whether the 10-K states substantial doubt about continuing as a going concern. | A sentence to that effect is found in the 10-K text. Quoted as filed. | The wording is the company's, not our estimate. It can also appear in a sentence saying the doubt was removed. |
| Restatement (8-K item 4.02) | Whether the company said earlier financial statements should no longer be relied on. | An 8-K item 4.02 in the last 2 years. | Some restatements are small and do not change the picture. |
| Late filing notice | Whether the company asked for more time to file a 10-K or 10-Q. | An NT 10-K or NT 10-Q in the last 2 years. | Delays can be technical and one-off. |
| Critical audit matters changed | Which topics the auditor singled out as most difficult, and whether they changed. | A matter is new in the latest 10-K compared with the one before. | A new matter shows where the auditor spent its effort, not that something is wrong. |
| Material weakness in internal control | Whether the 10-K concludes that internal control over financial reporting was not effective because of a material weakness. | A sentence in the 10-K text concludes that controls were not effective because of a material weakness, quoted as filed. Sentences that say there is none, that one could occur, or that an earlier one was fixed are not marked. | It is the company's or the auditor's own wording, not our estimate. Many are about one account or process and are fixed within a year. It does not say the numbers are wrong. |
| Material impairment (8-K item 2.06) | Whether the company told the SEC it expects a material charge for impaired assets, such as goodwill. | An 8-K item 2.06 in the last 2 years. | A non-cash write-down. It says an earlier value was too high, not that the business is failing or that cash ran out. |
| Bankruptcy (8-K item 1.03) | Whether the company filed for bankruptcy or receivership. | An 8-K item 1.03 in the last 2 years. | The filing is the company's own and is a fact. It does not say what shareholders will get or whether the business continues. |
The 10-point threshold is our choice, not an academic result. Every check cites the filing and the line items it used.
The auditor
Auditor's report in the 10-K filed Feb 26, 2026
What the auditor found hardest this year
- Revenue Recognition - Billboard and TransitAlso last yearAs described in Notes 2 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements, for the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company’s total revenue was $1,831.7 million, of which Billboard and Transit revenue were $1,391.4 million and $431.2 million, respectively. Billboard display revenues are derived from providing...
Years with the same auditor, closest peers
EGP 56 · Kpmg LLP WELL 56 · Ernst & Young LLP WPC 53 · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP VNO 50 · Deloitte & Touche LLP PSA 46 · Ernst & Young LLP UDR 42 · Ernst & Young LLP JLL 38 · Kpmg, LLP KIM 35 · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP OHI 34 · Ernst & Young LLP CPT 33 · Deloitte & Touche LLP FR 33 · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP O 33 · Kpmg LLP REG 33 · Kpmg LLP ARE 32 · Ernst & Young LLP CSGP 32 · Ernst & Young LLP ESS 32 · Kpmg LLP DEI 31 · Ernst & Young LLP KRC 31 · Deloitte & Touche LLP ELS 30 · Ernst & Young LLP VMRK 30 · Ernst and Young LLP AMT 29 · Deloitte & Touche LLP BXP 29 · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP CDP 29 · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP LAMR 27 · Kpmg LLP EQIX 26 · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP CUZ 24 · Deloitte & Touche LLP CXW 24 · Ernst & Young LLP EPR 24 · Kpmg LLP FRT 24 · Grant Thornton LLP HST 24 · Kpmg LLP IRM 24 · Deloitte & Touche LLP PLD 24 · Kpmg LLP RHP 24 · Ernst & Young LLP SBAC 24 · Ernst & Young LLP SPG 24 · Ernst & Young LLP WY 24 · Kpmg LLP ABR 23 · Ernst & Young LLP SUI 23 · Grant Thornton LLP DLR 22 · Kpmg LLP DRH 22 · Kpmg LLP NHI 22 · Bdo Usa, P.C. EXR 21 · Ernst & Young LLP HR 21 · Bdo Usa, P.C. IVT 21 · Kpmg LLP MAA 21 · Ernst & Young LLP HIW 20 · Deloitte & Touche LLP NNN 20 · Ernst & Young LLP OUT 18 · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP AGNC 18 · Ernst & Young LLP CBRE 18 · Kpmg LLP MPT 18 · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP CUBE 17 · Kpmg LLP PECO 17 · Deloitte & Touche LLP STAG 17 · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP STWD 17 · Deloitte & Touche LLP COLD 16 · Ernst & Young LLP DOC 16 · Deloitte & Touche LLP MAC 16 · Kpmg LLP SBRA 16 · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP CCI 15 · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP VAC 15 · Ernst & Young LLP NLY 14 · Ernst & Young LLP RITM 14 · Ernst & Young LLP RYN 14 · Ernst & Young LLP TRNO 14 · Ernst & Young LLP ADC 13 · Grant Thornton LLP AHR 13 · Deloitte & Touche LLP BXMT 13 · Deloitte & Touche LLP INVH 13 · Deloitte & Touche LLP COMP 12 · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP IRT 12 · Kpmg LLP UE 12 · Deloitte & Touche LLP VTR 12 · Kpmg LLP BRX 11 · Deloitte & Touche LLP CWK 11 · Kpmg LLP FCPT 11 · Kpmg LLP GNL 11 · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP AMH 10 · Ernst & Young LLP BNL 10 · Deloitte & Touche LLP GLPI 10 · Deloitte & Touche LLP NMRK 10 · Ernst & Young LLP SKT 10 · Deloitte & Touche LLP VICI 10 · Deloitte & Touche LLP LXP 9 · Deloitte & Touche LLP SMA 9 · Bdo Usa, P.C. JOE 8 · Grant Thornton LLP CTRE 7 · Deloitte & Touche LLP KRG 6 · Kpmg LLP EPRT 5 · Grant Thornton LLP HHH 4 · Kpmg LLP AKR 3 · Deloitte & Touche LLP SLG 3 · Deloitte & Touche LLP APLE 2 · Kpmg LLP CURB 2 · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP MRP 2 · Deloitte & Touche LLP REXR 2 · Kpmg LLP LINE 1 · PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPThe first year is from the report's own sentence "We have served as the Company's auditor since ...". Critical audit matters are the parts of the audit the auditor judged hardest; a new one is worth reading. A long tenure is common and not a finding by itself. Open the 10-K
Sources
The latest 10-K and its XBRL, the auditor's report, and 8-K items 4.01, 4.02, 2.06 and 1.03 in the filing index. Each check names its source.
Also
Revised numbers: past numbers a later 10-K reports differently.
Work with it
Excel workbook · CSV. Google Sheet that stays up to date: paste =IMPORTDATA("https://tickdelta.com/company/OUT/export.csv") into a cell.