tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

OXYOccidental Petroleum

Energy · Oil & Gas Production · NYSE
Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

1 review of OXY's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
1
latest letter 2019-07-01
Questions asked
5
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
1
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form S-4

2019-07-01 to 2019-07-05 · 5 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 2 from the company
No closing letter
DebtRisk factorsLegal and contingencies
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Data, page 131
SEC asked (1)
Expand the disclosure under the fifth bullet point to explain how the maturities on the new indebtedness ranging "from one to 30" years described under the bullet point are consistent with the disclosure under the caption "Financing of the Merger and Treatment of Existing Debt", provided on page 16, which appears to indicate shorter maturities.
OXY answered
We have expanded the disclosure under the caption “Financing of the Merger and Treatment of Existing Debt” regarding the committed $21.8 billion 364-day senior unsecured bridge loan facility to include the following:

“Such commitments were reduced by an aggregate principal amount of $8.8 billion, to an aggregate principal amount of $13.0 billion, upon Occidental’s entry into the term loan credit agreement described below and will be further reduced to the extent that Occidental obtains certain other long-term debt financing or debt financing commitments...including asset sales pursuant to
Rest of the answer

the Total transaction.”

We have expanded the disclosure under the fifth bullet point to include the following:

“the incurrence by Occidental of $21.8 billion of new indebtedness to finance a portion of the cash merger consideration, consisting of (i) $8.8 billion in term loans incurred under the term loan credit agreement, with maturities of 364 days and two years, and (ii) $13 billion in long-term debt issued or incurred in lieu of borrowings pursuant to, and which would reduce to $0 the commitments under, the bridge loan commitment letter, with maturities of up to thirty years.”

Read in the reply ↗
Notes to Pro Forma Financial Statements · Pro Forma Adjustment (e), page 143
SEC asked (2)
Expand your disclosure in pro forma adjustment (e)(i) to explain how the estimated average annual interest rate of 4.3% assumed on the new indebtedness of $21.8 billion was determined.
OXY answered
We have expanded the disclosure in pro forma adjustment (e)(i) to include the following:

“Issuance of $21.8 billion of new indebtedness, with an estimated average annual interest rate of 4.3%, yielding net proceeds of $4.4 billion and $17.2 billion in shortand long-term debt, respectively. Anticipated proceeds are net of $238 million in debt issuance costs.
Rest of the answer

After giving effect to the pay down of $8.8 billion in aggregate principal amount of term loans with the proceeds from the anticipated divestiture and other sources, the estimated average annual interest rate of the remaining $13 billion of new indebtedness is 4.6%. Estimated interest rates are based on underlying U.S. Treasury rates adjusted for Occidental’s anticipated credit spreads across a range of maturities.”

Read in the reply ↗
Notes to Pro Forma Financial Statements · Pro Forma Adjustment (e), page 143
SEC asked (3)
Provide us a supplemental analysis that shows, in reasonable detail, how the pro forma interest expense and amortization on the new debt is approximately $154 million and $615 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and for the year ended December 31, 2018, has been calculated.
OXY answered
We have expanded the disclosure in pro forma adjustment (e)(ii) to include the following:

“After giving effect to the pay down of $8.8 billion in aggregate principal amount of term loans, the associated pro forma interest expense and amortization on the remaining $13 billion of new indebtedness is approximately $154 million and $615 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and for the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively.
Rest of the answer

A one percent change in the assumed interest rate of the $13 billion in new indebtedness would increase or decrease the interest expense by $33 million and $130 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and for the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively. In the event the $8.8 billion of term loans are not repaid and remain outstanding, pro forma interest expense would increase by approximately $84 million and $336 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and for the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively.”

We also advise the Staff that pro forma interest expense and amortization on the new debt of $154 million and $615 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018 have been calculated as follows:

in millions

Year ended

December 31, 2018

New indebtedness issued and outstanding after giving effect to pay down of $8.8 billion in aggregate principal amount of term loans

Read in the reply ↗
Pro Forma Adjustment (f), page 143
SEC asked (4)
Pro forma adjustment (d) indicates that the fair value adjustments to Anadarko's property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, and debt were $38,839 million, $2,335 million, and $(2,133) million, respectively. Expand the disclosure under note (f) to reconcile the adjustments shown under that note to the amounts reflected in note (d). General
OXY answered
We have expanded the disclosure in pro forma adjustment (f) to include the following table to reconcile the adjustments shown under the note to the amounts reflected in note (d):

as of March 31, 2019

Fair value of Anadarko property, plant and equipment excluding Anadarko’s Africa assets

47,891

Less: Anadarko historical value property, plant and equipment excluding Anadarko’s Africa assets

(17,613

)

Fair value adjustment to increase Anadarko property, plant and equipment, net of Anadarko’s Africa assets

30,278

Fair value of property and equipment held for sale related to Anadarko’s
Rest of the answer

Africa assets

9,384

Less: Anadarko historical value property and equipment related to Africa assets

(2,693

Fair value adjustment to increase value related to Anadarko’s Africa assets(1)

6,691

Fair value of WES property, plant and equipment

10,500

Less: WES historical property, plant and equipment

(8,630

Fair value adjustment to increase WES property, plant and equipment

1,870

Fair value adjustment to Anadarko’s property, plant and equipment per Note (d)

38,839

Fair value of Intangible assets

3,168

Less: WES historical intangible assets

(833

Fair value adjustment to increase Intangible assets per Note (d)

2,335

Fair value adjustment to increase Intangible assets

Less: fair value adjustment attributable to noncontrolling interests

(1,892

Fair value adjustment to increase WES property, plant and equipment and intangibles

2,313

Fair value of debt attributable to Anadarko, excluding WES, assumed by Occidental

12,628

Less: Anadarko historical debt, excluding WES debt

(10,512

Fair value adjustment to Anadarko debt, excluding WES debt, assumed by Occidental

2,116

Fair value adjustment for WES debt

Fair value adjustment to increase debt per Note (d)

2,133

(1)

For additional information regarding the assumed transfer tax liability associated with Anadarko’s Africa assets, see “—Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation” above.

Fair value adjustment to Anadarko’s debt, excluding WES debt, assumed by Occidental (2)

(2,116

30,475

Estimated statutory domestic tax rate for the combined entity

7,009

(2)

Excludes fair value adjustment to WES debt of $17 million because the impact to deferred tax liabilities net of noncontrolling interests and the estimated statutory domestic tax rate was immaterial.

Read in the reply ↗
Pro Forma Adjustment (f), page 143
SEC asked (5)
Consistent with the requirements of Item 103 of Regulation S-K and pursuant to Item 10(a) of Form S-4, please revise your disclosure to describe any pending material litigation relating to the merger transaction. In that regard, we note the lawsuit filed on May 30, 2019, in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware seeking to inspect Occidental's books and records.
Rest of the question

In your related Rule 425 submission on May 30, you state that you "will respond in due course." We also note your risk factor disclosure at page 34 captioned: "Potential litigation against Occidental and Anadarko could result in an injunction preventing the completion of the merger or a judgment resulting in the payment of damages."

OXY answered
While we respectfully do not believe the matters described below are material to the merger, in response to the Staff’s comment, we have included under a new heading “Litigation Relating to the Merger” the following disclosure:

“On May 30, 2019, Anadarko received a demand letter from counsel to a purported Anadarko stockholder, seeking inspection of Anadarko’s books and records pursuant to Section 220 of the DGCL.
Rest of the answer

On May 9, 2019, Anadarko received a demand letter from counsel to a different purported Anadarko stockholder, seeking inspection of Anadarko’s books and records pursuant to Section 220 of the DGCL.

On May 30, 2019, a complaint was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware by purported Occidental stockholders High River Limited Partnership, Icahn Partners Master Fund LP and Icahn Partners LP, seeking inspection of Occidental’s books and records pursuant to Section 220 of the DGCL. On June 14, 2019, Occidental filed an answer to the complaint in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware.”

We have also revised the relevant risk factor as follows:

“On May 30, 2019, Anadarko received a demand letter from counsel to a purported Anadarko stockholder, seeking inspection of Anadarko’s books and records pursuant to Section 220 of the DGCL. On May 9, 2019, Anadarko received a demand letter from counsel to a different purported Anadarko stockholder, seeking inspection of Anadarko’s books and records pursuant to Section 220 of the DGCL. On May 30, 2019, a complaint was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware by purported Occidental stockholders High River Limited Partnership, Icahn Partners Master Fund LP and Icahn Partners LP, seeking inspection of Occidental’s books and records pursuant to Section 220 of the DGCL. On June 14, 2019,

Occidental filed an answer to the complaint in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware.

In addition, other stockholders of Occidental or Anadarko may file lawsuits against Occidental, Anadarko and/or the directors and officers of either company in connection with the merger. These lawsuits, including the matters described above, could prevent or delay the completion of the merger and result in significant costs to Anadarko and/or Occidental, including any costs associated with the indemnification of directors and officers. The defense or settlement of any lawsuit or claim, including the matters described above, that remains unresolved at the time the merger is completed may adversely affect Occidental’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.”

If you need any further information or elaboration, or if you wish to discuss any of the information presented above, please call me at your convenience at (713) 215-7802.

Read in the reply ↗

Also in this review: company letter, 2019-07-05

Other letters

Letters without questions

UPLOAD and CORRESP
3 other letters: notices that a filing will not be reviewed, requests to declare a registration effective, and the like

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 24 letters filed since 2016-06-23. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →