Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free
What companies that hold crypto say they bought and hold, quoted from their 8-Ks and checked against their 10-Qs; who holds the crypto ETFs, from every 13F; what changed in the ETFs' prospectuses; a daily copy of pages projects and stablecoin issuers change without notice; and what the largest DAOs voted for. No prices: every number here comes from a document, linked.
Closed Snapshot votes of the largest DAOs, newest first, with the choice that won and the proposal's own summary, quoted. "Money" marks proposals about the treasury, grants, fees, emissions, unlocks or buybacks.
GIP-154: Should GnosisDAO fund Gnosis Ltd with 15m/ year? ↗
Result: For with 100.0% of the votes cast
This is the successor proposal to GIP-128 and requests a grant of $15m in stablecoins, at half of last year’s ask, for a 12-month period starting September 1, 2026, disbursed quarterly to Gnosis Ltd’s Safe.
Signal Gnosis Guild to revive GIP-99? ↗
Result: Against with 98.7% of the votes cast
This proposal is a non-binding signaling vote to gauge community appetite for inviting Gnosis Guild to revisit the formally steward GnosisDAO governance under the structural principles originally outlined in GIP-99 (with modular governance infrastructure, staged funding milestones, explicit KPIs, and an independent firewall between governance operations and treasury allocation).
GIP-156: Should @Citrullin be banned from GnosisDAO Governance and Communication Channels? ↗
Result: For with 99.8% of the votes cast
Author: Philipp-Alexander Blum (@Citrullin) Status: Phase 3 (Direct Snapshot Referendum) Category: Governance, Transparency & Contributor Rights Voting System: Single-Choice Voting (YES / NO / ABSTAIN)
GIP-153: Should Gnosis Chain transition into the Ethereum Economic Zone? ↗
Result: For with 99.8% of the votes cast
GIP: 153 title: Should Gnosis Chain transition into the Ethereum Economic Zone? author: Friederike Ernst with co-authors Philippe Schommers and Ben Carvill status: phase-3 type: strategic direction created: 2026-07-22 1. Abstract This asks GnosisDAO to align on transitioning Gnosis Chain from a standalone Layer 1 into a ZK-proven Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) rollup instance that settles natively on Ethereum. This is not a new chain and there is nothing to migrate to: it is Gnosis Chain, now based on Ethereum, inheriting Ethereum’s security and liquidity directly.
Transition to an Independent Structural Governance Engine and Complete Separation of Powers ↗
Result: Against with 99.9% of the votes cast
This proposal outlines a structural overhaul of GnosisDAO governance to eliminate the systemic liabilities associated with centralized concentration of voting power (de facto GbR partnership liability) under the fully enforced Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulatory environment.
GIP 152 - Should GnosisDAO spin out the Gnosis App into an independent company? ↗
Result: For with 96.9% of the votes cast
Gnosis’s consumer app (Gnosis App), so far, has been run within the Gnosis Ltd annual funding mandate ($3.1 M – see GIP 128). Over the last few months, it has also been supported by the Circles team ($1.5M) & the Marketing team ($2M) as their primary focus in developing the product and bringing it to market. Gnosis App has built on work done in the past (including that of Metri & the Gnosis Wallet). It uses other Gnosis products under the hood (Gnosis Pay, CoWSwap, Safe). It hasn’t yet found breakout success/PMF. We spent the last 3 months rebuilding it centered on Circles (instead of a pure-play neobank approach, few reasons outlined here and here).
GIP-151: Should GnosisDAO offer a one-time pro-rata treasury redemption? ↗
Result: For with 97.5% of the votes cast
This proposal establishes a one-time, opt-in pro-rata treasury redemption, developed jointly with the Gnosis founding team. Any GNO holder may exchange their tokens for their pro-rata share of the DAO's liquid treasury at NAV, together with a discounted share of the capital called to date by GnosisVC. Participation is voluntary. Liquid assets are distributed in kind, redeemed GNO is returned to GnosisDAO and removed from circulation, and holders who do not participate keep their GNO and a larger pro-rata claim on what remains.
GIP-150: Should GnosisDAO let GNO holders redeem their pro-rata share of the treasury? ↗
Result: Against with 71.9% of the votes cast
This proposal establishes a one-time, opt-in pro-rata treasury redemption mechanism that allows any GNO holder to exchange their tokens for their pro-rata share of the GnosisDAO treasury. Participation is voluntary. Non-participants keep their GNO and retain their full economic exposure to the DAO’s continued operation.
Gnosis Launches Telegram Channel for Ecosystem Updates ↗
As activity across the Gnosis ecosystem continues to expand, access to timely and reliable information has become increasingly important.
Gnosis DAO Approves Phase 1 of the $GNO Airdrop Program ↗
The Gnosis governance community has passed a proposal to launch Phase 1 of a new $GNO incentive initiative designed to strengthen ecosystem participation and long-term alignment.
Gnosis DAO Approves Phase 1 of the $GNO Airdrop Program ↗
The Gnosis governance community has passed a proposal to launch Phase 1 of a new $GNO incentive initiative designed to strengthen ecosystem participation and long-term alignment.
Gnosis DAO Approves Phase 1 of the $GNO Airdrop Program ↗
Result: For with 100.0% of the votes cast
The Gnosis governance community has passed a proposal to launch Phase 1 of a new $GNO incentive initiative designed to strengthen ecosystem participation and long-term alignment.
GIP-149: Should Gnosis DAO fund continued support of Revoke.cash? ↗
Result: For with 99.1% of the votes cast
https://forum.gnosis.io/t/gip-149-should-gnosis-dao-fund-continued-support-of-revoke-cash/12131
GIP-145: Should Gnosis DAO run a 9‑month advisory futarchy pilot with $100k temporary liquidity? ↗
Result: For with 99.8% of the votes cast
Futarchy Labs would like to propose a futarchy pilot to GnosisDAO.
GIP-148: Selection of Treasury Management Service Provider ↗
Result: Noctua (Noca) with 54.6% of the votes cast
Following the Request for Proposals (RFP) process initiated on Jan 8th to identify qualified providers for GnosisDAO’s operational liquidity, endowment management, and governance-related treasury activities, this proposal facilitates the final selection of the service provider.
GIP-147: Enable ranked choice voting on the DAO ↗
Result: For with 100.0% of the votes cast
This proposal would update the Gnosis DAO governance mechanism to allow Ranked Choice voting for certain GIPs.
Result: For with 100.0% of the votes cast
Executive Summary Blockscout proposes a one-year renewal of its SLA and hosting services for Gnosis to provide the ecosystem’s open-source block explorer and developer infrastructure. Over the past year explorer usage has continued to grow, with Gnosis Monthly Active Users averages increasing 94% year-over-year (from 28.9K in 2024 to 56.2K in 2025) and Gnosis Daily active users nearly doubling from 1,059 to 1,992. Page views averaged 110K monthly since May 2025 (excluding July which had a large spike) demonstrating the explorer’s critical role in the Gnosis ecosystem.
GIP-143: Should the GnosisDAO Terminate karpatkey Treasury Management Services? ↗
Result: For with 87.6% of the votes cast
Following extensive community discussions over the past weeks regarding treasury management performance, cost, risk exposure, and alignment with DAO objectives, this proposal formalises the decision to conclude karpatkey’s engagement as GnosisDAO’s treasury manager.