tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

KEYSKeysight Technologies

Technology · Industrial Instruments · NYSE
Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

2 reviews of KEYS's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
2
latest letter 2020-02-21
Questions asked
4
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
0
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2019

2020-02-21 to 2020-03-19 · 1 question · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2020-03-19
Segments
Note 20. Segment Information, page 99
SEC asked
We note that you completed an organizational change during the first quarter of fiscal 2020 to manage your Ixia Solutions Group within your Communications Solutions Group and that as a result you will now have two reportable operating segments.
Rest of the question

Please describe to us in greater detail the specific changes made to your organization as part of this realignment, discuss how the management structure was modified and what changes were made to the discrete financial information that is available or reported to the CODM. Explain to us how you determined your operating segments and reportable segments in accordance with ASC 280-10-50-1 and 50-10. To the extent that you aggregate your operating segments, please provide us with your analysis under ASC 280-10-50-11. In closing, we remind you that the company and its management are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of their disclosures, notwithstanding any review, comments, action or absence of action by the staff.

KEYS answered
We completed an organizational change in the first quarter of fiscal 2020 to manage our Ixia Solutions Group (“ISG” or “Ixia”) within our Communications Solutions Group (“CSG”) to enable us to create improved go-to market and product development alignment as well as accelerate solution synergies as new technologies emerge.

Changes to the Organization Effective Q1 of Fiscal 2020

We have implemented several initiatives to leverage synergies and drive action around an end-to-end communications portfolio, including the following:

•

Effective in Q1 of fiscal 2020, Ixia has been organized into
Rest of the answer

CSG as the newly created Network Applications and Security (“NAS”) industry solutions team (“IST”), which is one of four CSG ISTs. ISTs manage product and business development resources to address industry solutions but do not

Ms. Tara Harkins

Securities and Exchange Commission directly manage manufacturing, sales, group-managed product development or any of the corporate infrastructure functions.

◦

Effective November 1, 2019, the Ixia Senior Vice President (“SVP”) reports to the CSG SVP as the head of NAS. Prior to this change, the Ixia SVP reported directly to the CEO.

As the newly formed NAS is now one of the Company’s seven ISTs, only orders and revenue are included in the monthly executive financial package provided to the CEO (our CODM). Before the reorganization, more comprehensive performance metrics were provided for Ixia as a separate solutions group, as described below under “Determination of Operating Segments.”

The Ixia sales team, which was previously a standalone sales organization, has been integrated into Keysight’s regional sales teams. With the integration, the new sales organization has the opportunity to sell any IST solution, including NAS.

The Ixia research and development (“R&D”) team, which previously worked independently, has been integrated into CSG to optimize R&D through collaborative development efforts across CSG.

These organizational changes had no impact to our other solutions group, Electronic Industrial Solutions Group (“EISG”).

Determination of Operating Segments

Effective November 1, 2019 and in accordance with ASC 280-10-50-1, we have determined that Keysight has two operating segments, CSG and EISG (the “solution groups”). Key factors supporting this conclusion are as follows:

CSG and EISG each engage in business activities from which it earns revenue and incurs expenses as described below.

CSG, which includes the Wireless Devices and Operators IST, the Internet Infrastructure IST, the NAS IST, and the Aerospace, Defense and Government IST, serves customers spanning the worldwide commercial communications and aerospace, defense and government end markets. The group’s solutions consist of electronic design and test software, instruments, systems and related services. These solutions are used in the simulation, design, validation, manufacturing, installation and optimization of electronic equipment networks.

EISG, which includes the General Electronics Measurement IST, the Semiconductor Measurement IST, and the Automotive and Energy IST, provides test and measurement solutions and related services across a broad set of electronic industrial end markets, focusing on high-value applications in the automotive and energy industry and measurement solutions for consumer electronics, education, general electronics design and manufacturing, and semiconductor design and manufacturing. The group provides electronic design and test software, instruments and systems and related services used in the simulation, design, validation, manufacturing, installation and optimization of electronic equipment.

A significant portion of CSG and EISG expenses arise from the Keysight Infrastructure Organization (“KIO”), which provides shared services and infrastructure company-wide to realize economies of scale and efficiently use resources. We manage these services at the corporate level and allocate to the solution groups all KIO costs, such as legal, accounting, real estate, insurance services, information technology services, treasury and other corporate infrastructure expenses. Allocations are determined on a basis that we consider to be a reasonable reflection of the utilization of services provided to or benefits received by the group.

CSG and EISG results are regularly reviewed by Keysight’s CEO, who is our CODM, to allocate resources and assess performance.

An Executive Summary of Financial Results (“ESFR”) is prepared monthly and reviewed by the CODM. The ESFR is an internal comprehensive management financial package that provides the following information:

Performance metrics and analysis for consolidated Keysight, CSG and EISG, including orders, revenue, cost of sales, gross margin, operating expenses, operating margin, inventory and DOH, AR and DSO, PP&E, backlog, ROIC and headcount compared to plan and forecast;

Invested capital calculations for consolidated Keysight, CSG and EISG;

Headcount for total Keysight, CSG, EISG and KIO;

Orders and revenue by quarter for consolidated Keysight, CSG and its four ISTs, and EISG and its three ISTs;

A summary of actual expenses versus plan and forecast for the KIO;

Keysight consolidated non-GAAP revenue and EPS relative to guidance and consensus expectations;

Keysight consolidated U.S. GAAP balance sheet, cash flow statement and statement of operations; and

A Keysight consolidated reconciliation of U.S. GAAP net income and EPS to non-GAAP figures.

CSG and EISG are each led by an executive officer who reports directly to Keysight’s CEO. CSG and EISG management are held accountable for the performance of the ISTs within their respective solutions group.

The CODM, when allocating resources within Keysight, reviews CSG and EISG results individually and assesses the performance of each solutions group in total (not at the IST level). The financial commitments are established at a Keysight enterprise level, and then the plans are set for the solutions groups. The CODM reviews the budget at the solutions group level (i.e., CSG and EISG), which also includes capital expenditure forecasts for each group.

The CODM is held accountable by Keysight’s Board of Directors for the operational performance of Keysight. The Board regularly reviews the Company’s financial results at the solutions group level (i.e., CSG and EISG).

Keysight refers to the solutions groups when communicating with investors. If additional disaggregated financial information is provided, such financial information is typically order and/or revenue performance by geographic area or end market rather than the performance of the individual ISTs.

Short-term incentive compensation for each solutions group leader is based on revenue growth for their respective solutions group and overall Keysight EPS.

Discrete financial information for CSG and EISG is available and regularly reviewed by the CODM. The discrete financial information, including revenue, gross margin and operating margin, is the basis for evaluating segment performance and making decisions about resource allocation.

Determination of Reportable Segments

In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-10, Keysight’s operating segments are CSG and EISG, and each operating segment meets the quantitative thresholds; therefore, CSG and EISG are the Company’s reportable segments.

The Company acknowledges that the Company and its management are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of our disclosures, notwithstanding any review, comments, action or absence of action by the Staff. If you have any questions with respect to this letter, please contact the undersigned at 707-577-6262.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2020-03-06: 10-Q filed 2020-06-02 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2019-08-30 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2020-03-19

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2015

2016-04-05 to 2016-05-10 · 3 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2016-05-10
ControlsSegmentsResults discussion (MD&A)Non-GAAP measures
Exhibit 23.1
SEC asked (1)
Please tell us why the consent does not also refer to the report of your independent registered public accounting firm on your internal control over financial reporting.
KEYS answered
We have confirmed with our independent registered public accounting firm that their consent inadvertently did not contain a reference to their report on our internal control over financial reporting. We will file an amendment to our Form 10-K with the corrected consent as Exhibit 23.1. Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2016-04-18: 10-Q filed 2016-06-03 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-03-04 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations · Executive Summary, page 22
SEC asked (2)
We note that on November 3, 2015, you announced an organizational structure change that resulted in the creation of the Communications Solutions Group, Industrial Solutions Group and Services Solutions Group. We further note that you are currently in the process of aligning the organization to this new structure and evaluating the impact, if any, on your financial reporting.
Rest of the question

Please address the following:  Clearly describe to us the organizational structure change you are currently implementing, including your timeframe for completion and a summary of your current progress; and  Explain to us how your current businesses, Management Solutions and Customer Support and Solutions, will be impacted and how you expect this new structure to impact your segment reporting under US GAAP. Refer to ASC 280-10-50-1 through 9 and ASC 280-10-50-34.

KEYS answered
The announced changes to our organizational structure support our solutions-oriented approach to growth by aligning our organization with the industries we serve versus our product lines. To effect this transformation, we are in the process of forming new solution groups and a corresponding management structure based on the industries we serve. We are currently classifying our customers by industry, determining the methodology for allocating shared costs and revising our information systems to support reporting under the new structure.
Rest of the answer

We expect to finalize the changes to support management and decision-making under the new structure no earlier than June 2016.

We expect this organizational change to have the effect of transforming the current Measurement Solutions segment into two new operating segments: the Communications Solutions Group (“CSG”) and the Industrial Solutions Group (“ISG”). The Customer Support and Solutions segment will be renamed the Services Solutions Group (“SSG”), but operating results for SSG are expected to be the same as under the old structure. The new organization will continue to include centralized enterprise functions that will provide support across the groups.

In accordance with ASC 280-10-50-1 through 9, we expect that CSG, ISG and SSG will be our new reportable operating segments. CSG, ISG and SSG each engage in business activities from which it earns revenue and incurs expenses and is led by an executive manager who reports directly to our Chief Executive Officer, who is our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”). On no less than a monthly basis, the CODM will review discrete financial information for each of the segments, including revenue, gross profit and operating expenses, which will be the basis for evaluating segment performance and making decisions with regard to resource allocation. In addition, operating results for CSG, ISG and SSG will be the basis for discussion of Keysight operating results in external quarterly reports, the development of budgets and forecasts, as well as information provided to analysts, investors and the Keysight Board of Directors.

We will not be managing our operations under the new structure prior to filing our Form 10-Q for the three months ended April 30, 2016, which is currently planned for June 3, 2016. Pursuant to ASC 280-10-50-34, we will revise our segment disclosure using the new reporting structure when we have the infrastructure in place and are managing our operations under the new structure, which is currently expected to be in the three-month period ending July 31, 2016, but subsequent to June 3. We will also restate the corresponding information for prior periods to conform to the new segment structure.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2016-04-18: 10-Q filed 2016-06-03 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-03-04 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Exhibit 99.1
SEC asked (3)
We note that you present your reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures in the form of a full non-GAAP statement of operations for the three months ended January 31, 2016 and 2015. Please note that the presentation of a full non-GAAP statement of operations may place undue prominence to the non-GAAP information and may give the impression that the non-GAAP statement of operations represents a comprehensive basis
Rest of the question

of accounting. Please confirm to us that you will revise your presentation and remove the non-GAAP statement of operations in future filings. Please refer to Question 102.10 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Codification and Disclosure Interpretation that is available on our website at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/nongaapinterp.htm.

KEYS answered
In future filings, we will revise our presentation and remove the full non-GAAP statement of operations.

The Company acknowledges that:

The Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

The Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission of any person under the federal securities laws of the United States. Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2016-04-18: 10-Q filed 2016-06-03 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2016-03-04 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2016-05-10

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 6 letters filed since 2016-04-05. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →