NDSNNordson Corporation

We note on page 2 of your earnings release you provide outlook guidance for the non- GAAP financial measure adjusted diluted earnings per share without providing a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

Rest of the question

Refer to Question 102.10(b) of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures updated December 13, 2022 and provide in the future a reconciliation or the required information.

The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment. When providing outlook guidance for adjusted diluted earnings per share in future earnings releases, the Company intends on

Division of Corporate Finance

February [21], 2024 excluding a quantitative reconciliation in reliance upon the exception provided by Item 10(e)(1)(i)(B) of Regulation S-K.

Rest of the answer

When omitting a quantitative reconciliation in future earnings releases, the Company intends on providing disclosure substantially consistent with the following:

“It is not possible for the Company to identify the amount or significance of future adjustments associated with acquisition and integration costs, restructuring costs, acquisition-related amortization, certain non-operating or income tax items, or other non-routine costs that the Company adjusts in the presentation of adjusted earnings guidance. These items are dependent on future events that are not reasonably estimable at this time. Accordingly, the Company is unable to reconcile without unreasonable effort the forecasted range of adjusted earnings guidance for the full year to a comparable GAAP range.”

Read in the reply ↗

We note your reconciliations of non-GAAP measures. Please consider clearly labeling each measure as non-GAAP rather than including GAAP labeled line items under the caption "Non-GAAP Measures - Adjusted Profitability" so that the intent of this disclosure is clear. Similarly, consider clearly labeling "adjusted EPS" and "revised adjusted EPS" as non-GAAP.

The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comments. In future earnings releases, the Company will clearly label each measure under the caption “Non-GAAP Measures – Adjusted Profitability” as “adjusted” or “non-GAAP” and otherwise add any additional disclosure necessary to ensure that non-GAAP financial measures are appropriately identified as such. However, the Company believes that adding “non-GAAP” to “adjusted EPS” is not necessary because “adjusted EPS” is widely known to be a non-GAAP financial measure.

Rest of the answer

The Company advises the Staff that it does not intend to disclose “revised adjusted EPS” in future earnings releases.

Read in the reply ↗

Where multiple factors are cited as the underlying causes of a material change in operations, please quantify the impact of the factors so a reader can assess their relative importance. For example, in your discussion of the decrease in gross margin from 2013 to 2014 and again in 2015, you refer to product line and customer mix and the unfavorable effects of currency translation, factors that presumably offset the

Rest of the question

impact of increased sales volumes. Please revise the discussion of results of operations throughout to quantify the impact of factors materially influencing your operations. Also, please analyze factors underlying material intermediate effects, e.g. the nature of the change in product mix and underlying reasons.

In response to this comment, the Company proposes adding disclosure similar to the following to future filings when multiple factors impact the changes in the

Company’s results between the periods presented, to separately quantify the impact of each such factor. Such disclosures will be included in future filings effective with the Form 10-Q to be filed for the three and six month periods ended

April 30, 2016.

Letter to U.S. SEC

From: Nordson Corporation

Cost of sales were $774,702 in 2015, up 2.1 percent from 2014.

Rest of the answer

Gross profit, expressed as a percentage of sales, decreased to 54.1 percent in 2015 from 55.5 percent in 2014. The 1.4 percent reduction in gross margin was primarily a result of the unfavorable effects of foreign currency translation, which reduced gross margin by approximately 1 percent. The remaining margin reduction was attributable to product line and customer mix and was driven primarily by growth in sales of lower-margin engineered systems within our Industrial Coating Segment during 2015.

Read in the reply ↗

We note you incurred severance and restructuring costs of $11,411 for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015. Please expand your disclosure to include all of the information required by ASC 420-10-51-1, as applicable.

Rest of the question

In addition, expand the disclosure in your Management’s Discussion and Analysis, with respect to your restructuring activities, to quantify and discuss the periods in which material cash outlays are anticipated, the expected effects on your financial position and future earnings and cash flows at the consolidated and segment levels, and the amount and period(s) in which cost savings are anticipated at the consolidated and segment levels. In subsequent periods, disclose whether actual results were in line with the anticipated cost savings. If the anticipated cost savings are not achieved as expected, or will be achieved in periods other than as expected, disclose the reasons for the differences and the likely effects on future operating results and liquidity. You may wish to refer to the guidance in SAB Topic 5:P.4.

The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and respectfully advises that management considered the disclosure requirements of ASC 420-10-50-1 and SAB Topic 5:P.4 in connection with the preparation of the consolidated financial statements included in the 2015 Form 10-K. For the fiscal year-ended

October 31, 2015, severance and restructuring costs of $11,411 approximated 3.7% of income before income taxes and the Company’s restructuring liability balance related to the 2015 initiatives approximated $9,673.

Rest of the answer

Further, cash outlays related to severance and restructuring actions were less than 1.0% of operating cash flows in 2015, and future cash outlays are expected to have a similar impact on operating cash flows in 2016. Accordingly, management determined that the costs incurred, the associated liability balances and cash outlays were not material and additional disclosure was not required.

In response to the

Staff’s comment, the Company proposes revising and expanding its disclosure for severance and restructuring costs prospectively in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in order to comply with ASC 420-10-50-1 and SAB Topic 5:P.4.

Such disclosures will be included in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in future Form 10-Q and Form 10-K filings, to the extent material. An example of that disclosure is as follows:

Severance and restructuring costs totaling $11,411 were recognized in 2015, comprised of initiatives impacting each of our segments. Additional costs related to these 2015 initiatives are not expected to be material in future periods.

Within the Adhesives Dispensing Systems segment, restructuring initiatives to optimize operations in the U.S. and Belgium resulted in a charge of $7,972, which consisted of severance costs of $7,064, fixed asset impairment charges of $554 relating to the closure of one facility and other one-time costs of $354.

Within the Advanced Technology Systems segment, certain restructuring programs to enhance operational efficiency and customer service in the

U.S. and Germany resulted in a charge of $3,060. This charge consisted of severance costs of $1,586, one-time lease termination costs of $1,322 and other one-time costs of $152.

Within the Industrial Coatings Systems segment, a restructuring program to enhance operational efficiency and customer service resulted in a charge for severance costs of $379.

The majority of the costs incurred during 2015 relate to severance costs, some of which were paid in

2015 with the remainder expected to be paid during 2016, along with payments related to lease termination costs.

The following table summarizes severance and restructuring activity related to actions initiated in 2015:

Fixed asset impairment charges

Employee severance

Lease termination

Other one-time costs

Total

Accrual Balance at October 31, 2014

$

—

Charged to expense

554

9,029

1,322

506

11,411

Cash payments

(1,184

)

Non cash utilization

(554

Accrual Balance at October 31, 2015

7,845

9,673

In addition, to the extent future severance and restructuring costs are deemed to be material, the Company will expand its Management’s Discussion and Analysis disclosure in future filings to quantify and discuss the periods in which material cash outlays are anticipated, the expected effects on the Company’s financial position and future earnings and cash flows at the consolidated and segment levels, and the amount and period(s) in which cost savings are anticipated at the consolidated and segment levels.

Read in the reply ↗

You describe the manner in which your currency adjustments function broadly on page 38, but do not discuss the specific manner in which currency adjustments were calculated in determining executive compensation this year. In addition, you state on page 40 under the heading Summary of Payouts that “[f]urther adjustments to the formulaic payouts under the Cash Incentive Award were made for Messrs.

Rest of the question

Hilton and Keane.” In future filings please ensure that you fully describe the manner in which your currency adjustments and any other discretionary adjustments are calculated and applied to the payouts under your plan. Please refer to Item 402(b)(2)(vi) of Regulation S-K.

As requested, future filings will comply with disclosure requirements, as prescribed by Item 402 of Regulation S-K, applicable to incentive plan payouts, including a full description of currency and/or discretionary adjustments considered in the calculation of payouts.

In connection with this response, the Company acknowledges that:

• the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filings;

Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filings; and the

Rest of the answer

Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Read in the reply ↗