tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

PPLPPL Corporation

Utilities · Electric Utilities · NYSE

PPL, headquartered in Allentown, Pennsylvania, is a utility holding company, incorporated in 1994. 10-K, Item 1

Headquarters
Allentown, PA
Next results
around Feb 19, 2027
Compare with peers → Embed

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. Below: what the staff asked PPL, and the company's answer to each question, quoted from the letters. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K

2018-04-03 to 2018-04-18 · 4 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2018-04-18
Non-GAAP measuresResults discussion (MD&A)Legal and contingencies
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations · Reconciliation of Earnings from Ongoing Operations, page 51
SEC asked (1)
Adjustments to arrive at a non-GAAP performance measure should be presented as a separate adjustment and clearly explained. Please refer to question 102.11 of our Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations; Non-GGAP Financial Measures. Please revise future filings accordingly.
PPL answered
The reconciliation of our non-GAAP financial measure, “Earnings from Ongoing Operations” to the most comparable GAAP measure of “Net Income” for each Registrant is provided for each period presented on page 52. Each reconciling adjustment (referred to as a special item) is separately presented on an after-tax basis with the related tax impact disclosed next to each item.
Rest of the answer

The tax impact for each separate reconciling adjustment is included to comply with Question 102.11 of the Division of Corporation Finance’s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DI) on Non-GAAP Financial Measures that were issued in May 2016.

We respectfully acknowledge the Staff’s comments; however, we believe our current presentation is aligned with the intent of the guidance in Question 102.11 as the income tax effect of each reconciling adjustment is shown separately in a succinct and transparent manner, and results in both the pre-tax and after-tax impacts of each adjustment being easily determinable based on the information presented.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2018-04-16: 10-Q filed 2018-05-03 ↗.

No earlier 10-Q before the SEC's letter is in Tickdelta, so there is nothing to compare with.

Changes in Margin, page 53
SEC asked (2)
Gross margins appear to represent a non-GAAP financial measure. Please tell us why you believe that gross margin is presented in accordance with GAAP. If gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure, please provide a reconciliation of the differences between the non-GAAP financial measure with the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP and the other disclosures
Rest of the question

required by Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K. Also, the use of titles or descriptions of non- GAAP financial measures should not be the same as, or confusingly similar to, titles or descriptions used for GAAP financial measures. Please refer to Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K. Please revise the title of this non-GAAP financial measure in future filings. Financial Statements 5. Income and Other Taxes

PPL answered
to your comment, in future filings we will revise the titles of these non-GAAP measures to “U.K. Adjusted Gross Margins”, “Kentucky Adjusted Gross Margins” and

“Pennsylvania Adjusted Gross Margins” to further differentiate these measures from GAAP financial measures.

Financial Statements

5. Income and Other Taxes Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2018-04-16: 10-Q filed 2018-05-03 ↗.

No earlier 10-Q before the SEC's letter is in Tickdelta, so there is nothing to compare with.

Unrecognized Tax Benefits, page 165
SEC asked (3)
Please tell what consideration you gave to disclosing the information required by ASC 740-10-50-15 and 15A. 13. Commitments and Contingencies
PPL answered
For the disclosure of unrecognized tax benefits (“UTBs”) in the financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2017, the Registrants considered the following requirements detailed in ASC 740-10-50-15 and 15A:

A tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of UTBs, which includes the beginning and end of period balances, the gross amounts of the increases and decreases in UTBs as a result of tax positions taken during the current and/or prior periods and the reductions to the UTBs relating to settlements with taxing authorities and/or as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of
Rest of the answer

limitations;

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate;

The total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the statement of operations and the statement of financial position;

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2018-04-16: 10-Q filed 2018-05-03 ↗.

No earlier 10-Q before the SEC's letter is in Tickdelta, so there is nothing to compare with.

Legal Matters, page 210
SEC asked (4)
We note that you are unable to predict the outcome of the Cane Run Environmental Claims or the E.W. Brown Environmental Claims. Please tell us what consideration you gave to disclosing an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss for these matters or that such an estimate cannot be made. Please refer to ASC450-30-50-4.
PPL answered
The reasonable possibility that the total amounts of UTBs would significantly increase or decrease within 12 months of the reporting date; and Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2018-04-16: 10-Q filed 2018-05-03 ↗.

No earlier 10-Q before the SEC's letter is in Tickdelta, so there is nothing to compare with.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2018-04-18

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 3 letters filed since 2018-04-03. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Work on PPL in a spreadsheet: Excel workbook (a sheet per section, ten years by column, charts, links to the filings) · CSV. For a Google Sheet that stays up to date, paste =IMPORTDATA("https://tickdelta.com/company/PPL/export.csv") into a cell.