tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

TDYTeledyne Technologies

Technology · Defense Electronics · NYSE
Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

2 reviews of TDY's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
2
latest letter 2024-05-11
Questions asked
7
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
0
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2023

2024-05-11 to 2024-05-22 · 5 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2024-05-22
Liquidity and cashAcquisitionsIncome taxesRevenueSegmentsResults discussion (MD&A)Non-GAAP measuresGoodwill and impairmentCritical estimates
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations · Consolidated Results of Operations, page 23
SEC asked (1)
Where you describe two or more business reasons that contributed to a material change in a financial statement line item between periods, please quantify, where possible, the extent to which each factor contributed to the overall change in that line item, including any offsetting factors.
Rest of the question

When you discuss revenue fluctuations, specifically describe the extent to which changes are attributable to changes in prices or to changes in the volume or amount of goods or services being sold or to the introduction of new products or services. In addition, where you identify intermediate causes of changes in your operating results, also describe the reasons underlying the intermediate causes. As an example, you quantify on page 24 the combined incremental Digital Imaging revenues related to acquisitions and organic sales growth but do not separately quantify each component or the offsetting impact of the lower product sales you identify and do not expand on the reasons driving the growth or decline of your product categories. We further note that you attribute the increase in consolidated and segment cost of sales on pages 23-26 to "higher net sales" and "product mix" but do not consistently provide additional context regarding the product categories impacting your margins. Ensure you explain in sufficient detail the reasons driving these changes and that your overall revised disclosures assist in satisfying the requirements of Item 303(a)-(b) of Regulation S-K and the three principal objectives of MD&A, as noted in SEC Release No. 33-8350: • to provide a narrative explanation of a company’s financial statements that enables investors to see the company through the eyes of management; • to enhance the overall financial disclosure and provide the context within which financial information should be analyzed; and • to provide information about the quality of, and potential variability of, a company’s earnings and cash flow, so that investors can ascertain the likelihood that past performance is indicative of future performance

TDY answered
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and the applicable guidance cited. We confirm that in future filings, beginning with our next Form 10-Q, where we describe two or more business reasons that contributed to a material change in a financial statement line item between periods, we will quantify, where possible, the extent to which each factor contributed to the overall change in that line item, including any offsetting factors.

With respect to specifically describing the extent to which material changes in revenue from period to period are attributable to changes in prices or to changes in the
Rest of the answer

volume or amount of goods or services being sold or to the introduction of new products or services, our revenues are significantly impacted by factors other than price and volume. Product mix often varies considerably period to period, and unlike commodity goods, like for like unit price and volume comparisons for products are often limited. Furthermore, across our businesses, we offer many products that are sold at varying prices to different customers in different regions. Therefore, we do not quantify aggregate price and volume for our product lines or segments and believe it would not be practical to do so. However, if there are material changes to overall volume or pricing that impact our financial results, such as a material new product or discontinuation of a material product, we will disclose those changes. Where we identify intermediate causes of changes in our operating results, we confirm that in future filings we will describe the reasons underlying the intermediate causes.

We also confirm that our future disclosures will assist in satisfying the requirements of Item 303(a)-(b) of Regulation S-K and the three principal objectives of MD&A, as noted in SEC Release No. 33-8350.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2024-05-21: 10-Q filed 2024-07-29 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2024-04-29 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Income Taxes, page 24
SEC asked (2)
We note your disclosure of "Provision (benefit) for income taxes without discrete event expense (benefit)" and "Effective tax rate without discrete events," which appear to represent non-GAAP measures. Please revise future filings to label these measures as non- GAAP measures and to provide all disclosures required by Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K.
Rest of the question

Ensure that you separately disclose each discrete event adjustment and also apply this comment to your earnings releases.

TDY answered
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and the applicable guidance cited. In future filings, including our earnings releases, we will label non-GAAP measures and will provide the disclosures required by Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K, as appropriate. Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2024-05-21: 10-Q filed 2024-07-29 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2024-04-29 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates · Business Combinations, Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets, page 31
SEC asked (3)
For any reporting units at risk for goodwill impairment, such as your FLIR reporting unit, please disclose in future filings the amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit and expand upon the methods and key assumptions used in your goodwill impairment test and how the key assumptions were determined.
Rest of the question

Although you disclose that you "primarily" use a discounted cash flow model, we note that your audit report references the additional use of the market approach for your FLIR reporting unit.

TDY answered
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment. At the assessment date in the fourth quarter of 2023, goodwill at our FLIR Reporting unit was $5,832.4 million, which represented the high end of the range of goodwill balances at our reporting units as disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2023.
Rest of the answer

In future filings, beginning with our next Form 10-Q, we will disclose the amount of goodwill allocated to any at risk reporting unit as well as expand upon the methods, including our use of both income and market methods, and key assumptions used in our goodwill impairment test and how the key assumptions were determined, as appropriate.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2024-05-21: 10-Q filed 2024-07-29 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2024-04-29 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies · Stock-based Compensation Costs, page 49
SEC asked (4)
We note that beginning in fiscal 2024 you changed the valuation model used to determine the fair value of stock options from a lattice-based option pricing model to the Black- Scholes option pricing model. Please tell us and disclose pursuant to SAB Topic 14:C.3 the basis for the change.
Rest of the question

Consistent with ASC 718-10-55-20 and 55-27, tell us how you concluded, if true, that the Black-Scholes model results in a better estimate of fair value.

TDY answered
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and the applicable guidance cited. As disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2023, we recorded $12.4 million, $17.9 million, and $20.0 million for stock option expense for 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively, with the decrease in expense between these years due to fewer employees receiving stock option grants. In fiscal year 2022, we began to grant stock option awards to a smaller group of employees than in prior years, as a larger proportion of our employees began receiving time-based restricted stock unit awards in lieu of stock options.
Rest of the answer

We do not expect the amount of stock option expense in future filings to rise above the immaterial levels we are now recording.

During 2022, we also began reassessing the valuation techniques needed to appropriately determine the fair value for a smaller number of stock option award program participants. Among other things, we observed that the exercise patterns of the smaller group of employees receiving stock options had a similar option exercising behavior, which was more closely aligned with the methodology of the Black-Scholes model. Starting in 2022, we also corroborated the fair value of stock option awards granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and we confirmed that the fair values determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the lattice-based option pricing model were materially similar.

In our Form 10-K for the year ending December 29, 2024, we will disclose the reason for the change in valuation model applied to stock options grants made subsequent to fiscal year 2023, with expected language as follows:

In 2024, the Company began using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options. The adoption of the Black-Scholes option pricing model was driven by a review of option exercise history, which more closely aligned with the methodology of the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2024-05-21: 10-Q filed 2024-07-29 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2024-04-29 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Note 9. Income Taxes, page 59
SEC asked (5)
We note that you continue to make an indefinite reinvestment assertion for unrepatriated earnings of your material subsidiaries in Canada. Please disclose in future filings the amount of unremitted foreign earnings pursuant to ASC 740-30-50-2b.
Rest of the question

In closing, we remind you that the company and its management are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of their disclosures, notwithstanding any review, comments, action or absence of action by the staff.

TDY answered
We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and the applicable guidance cited. Starting with the Form 10-K for the year ending December 29, 2024, we will disclose an estimated amount of unremitted foreign earnings of our material subsidiaries in Canada pursuant to ASC 740-30-50-2b. Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2024-05-21: 10-Q filed 2024-07-29 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2024-04-29 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2024-05-22

Form 10-K

2015-06-22 to 2015-07-15 · 2 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2015-07-15
Non-GAAP measuresSegmentsResults discussion (MD&A)Legal and contingencies
Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2014 · Item 1. Business, page 1
SEC asked (1)
We note your disclosure on page 1 that your aggregate segment operating profit and other segment income was $338 million in 2014. In light of the fact that this amount represents the combined profit of your reporting segments presented in Note 13 for purposes of the ASC 280 required reconciliation, it represents a non-GAAP financial measure when disclosed elsewhere in your filing.
Rest of the question

Please revise to include the disclosures required by Item 10(e) of Regulation SK as they relate to this non-GAAP financial measure. See Question 104.04 of the Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures dated July 8, 2011.

TDY answered
We acknowledge the Staff’s comments, and we agree that the non-GAAP disclosure of our aggregate segment operating profit and other segment income of $338.4 million in our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Item 1. Business, page 1 must be accompanied by a reconciliation to the appropriate GAAP amount. We intend to exclude this non-GAAP disclosure from page 1, Item 1. Business section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, in future filings, beginning with our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Rest of the answer

Additionally, in future filings beginning with our second quarter 2015 Form 10-Q, we will ensure that the disclosures required in Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K are provided in each place aggregate segment operating profit and other segment income, a non-GAAP measure, is used.

Securities and Exchange Commission

Note 15. Commitments and Contingencies, page 98

We note your disclosure that for a number of lawsuits, claims and proceedings that have been or may be asserted against the company, management does not believe that the disposition of any such pending matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on your financial condition, however the resolution in any reporting period of one of more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on your results of operations for that period. In light of the fact that you disclose there may be pending matters that could have a material adverse effect on your results of operations, if there are any contingencies that have at least a reasonable possibility that a loss or additional loss has been incurred, for which no accrual has been made or exposure to loss exists in excess of the accrual, please tell us and revise to disclose the nature of the contingency and an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss, or include disclosure that such an estimate cannot be made. Your disclosure should be similarly revised for any asserted claims related to your US Government contract work disclosed in Note 15. See guidance in ASC 450-20-50-3 and 4.

RESPONSE:

We advise the Staff that as of December 28, 2014, the amount of estimated losses related to contingencies that had a reasonable possibility that a loss or additional loss had been incurred totaled less than $1.0 million for both (i) Other Lawsuits, Claims and Proceedings and (ii) U.S. Government contract work, respectively and therefore, we believe these contingencies are not material and would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.

We supplementary advise the Staff that as of December 28, 2014, all legal matters that had at least a reasonable possibility that a loss or additional loss had been incurred were estimable by us under the requirements of ASC 450-20-50.

Accordingly, we advise the Staff that based on the same information available at the time we filed our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the supplemental information provided above, the statements on page 98 that “…the resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations for that period” represented disclosure of the uncertainty inherent in any litigation matters rather than a judgment on the disclosed matters.

For all potential loss contingencies, including (i) Other Lawsuits, Claims and Proceedings and (ii) U.S. Government contract work, we will clarify in future filings our disclosures based on the facts and circumstances at the time.

The Company hereby acknowledges that: (a) the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its filing; (b) staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and (c) the Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2015-07-07: 10-Q filed 2015-08-04 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2015-05-01 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Note 15. Commitments and Contingencies, page 98
SEC asked (2)
We note your disclosure that for a number of lawsuits, claims and proceedings that have been or may be asserted against the company, management does not believe that the disposition of any such pending matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on your financial condition, however the resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on your results of
Rest of the question

operations for that period. In light of the fact that you disclose there may be pending matters that could have a material adverse effect on your results of operations, if there are any contingencies that have at least a reasonable possibility that a loss or additional loss has been incurred, for which no accrual has been made or exposure to loss exists in excess of the accrual, please tell us and revise to disclose the nature of the contingency and an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss, or include disclosure that such an estimate cannot be made. Your disclosure should be similarly revised for any asserted claims related to your US Government contract work disclosed in Note 15. See guidance in ASC 450-20-50-3 and 4.

TDY answered

No numbered answer found in the reply. Read the reply ↗

In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2015-07-07: 10-Q filed 2015-08-04 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2015-05-01 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2015-07-15

Other letters

Letters without questions

UPLOAD and CORRESP
2 other letters: notices that a filing will not be reviewed, requests to declare a registration effective, and the like

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 8 letters filed since 2015-06-22. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →