Sentences and paragraphs of XEL's Risk Factors and MD&A, 10-K 2026-02-25 against 10-K 2025-02-27.
Each links to the text at sec.gov.
Show the other 60
AddedRisk Factors
Regulators may challenge rate increases due to increased customer affordability pressures. Public policy developments, including legislative actions and electoral changes at the state level, may affect recovery mechanisms or allowed returns and may limit recovery timing or cost allocation, negatively impacting our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
AddedRisk Factors
Growth in large load customers, including data centers, may increase customer concentration, capital requirements and revenue variability risks.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
AddedRisk Factors
Additional demand from a limited number of customers may increase our credit risk exposure and require incremental infrastructure investment. If anticipated load growth does not materialize as expected or regulatory cost allocation mechanisms evolve, it could negatively impact our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
AddedRisk Factors
Advancements in artificial intelligence and large language models may increase cybersecurity threats and operational risks. Threat actors may use artificial intelligence to enhance their attacks, increasing the frequency, sophistication and potential impact of cyber incidents affecting our IT and OT environment.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedRisk Factors
The Board of Directors is responsible for the oversight of material risk and maintaining an effective risk monitoring process. Management and the Board of Directors’ committees have responsibility for overseeing the identification and mitigation of key risks and reporting its assessments and activities to the full Board of Directors.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedRisk Factors
Xcel Energy maintains a robust compliance program and promotes a culture of compliance beginning with the tone at the top. The risk mitigation process includes adherence to our Code of Conduct and compliance policies, operation of formal risk management structures and overall business management. Xcel Energy further mitigates inherent risks through formal risk committees and corporate functions such as internal audit, and internal controls over financial reporting and legal.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedRisk Factors
Management identifies and analyzes risks to determine materiality and other attributes such as timing, probability and controllability. Identification and risk analysis occurs formally through risk assessment conducted by senior management, the financial disclosure process, hazard risk procedures, internal audit and compliance with financial and operational controls.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedRisk Factors
Management also identifies and analyzes risk through the business planning process, development of goals and establishment of key performance indicators, including identification of barriers to implementing Xcel Energy’s strategy. The business planning process also identifies likelihood and mitigating factors to prevent the assumption of inappropriate risk to meet goals.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedRisk Factors
Management communicates regularly with the Board of Directors and key stakeholders regarding risk. Senior management presents and communicates a periodic risk assessment to the Board of Directors, providing information on the risks that management believes are material, including financial impact, timing, likelihood and mitigating factors. The Board of Directors regularly reviews management’s key risk assessments, which includes areas of existing and future macroeconomic, financial, operational, policy, environmental, safety and security risks.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedRisk Factors
The oversight, management and mitigation of risk is an integral and continuous part of the Board of Directors’ governance of Xcel Energy. The Board of Directors assigns oversight of critical risks to each of its four committees to confirm these risks are well understood and given appropriate focus.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedRisk Factors
The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing the adequacy of the committees’ risk oversight and affirming appropriate aggregate oversight occurs. Committees regularly report on their oversight activities and certain risk issues may be brought to the full Board of Directors for consideration when deemed appropriate.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedRisk Factors
Emerging risks are considered and assigned as appropriate during the annual Board of Directors and committee evaluation process, resulting in updates to the committee charters and annual work plans. Additionally, the Board of Directors conducts an annual strategy session where Xcel Energy’s future plans and initiatives are reviewed.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedRisk Factors
We have programs in place to mitigate the physical and financial risks associated with wildfires; however, Xcel Energy’s wildfire mitigation initiatives may not be successful or effective in preventing or reducing wildfire-related losses. Wildfires can occur even when Xcel Energy follows its procedures and implements its wildfire mitigation initiatives.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedRisk Factors
In addition, Xcel Energy cannot fully assure that its controls will be effective against all potential risks. If such programs and procedures are not effective, Xcel Energy’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows could be materially impacted.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedRisk Factors
Our employees, directors, third-party contractors, or suppliers may violate or be perceived to violate our Codes of Conduct, which could have an adverse effect on our reputation.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedRisk Factors
We are exposed to risk of employee or third-party contractor fraud or misconduct. All employees and members of the Board of Directors are subject to compliance with our Code of Conduct and are required to participate in annual training. Additionally, suppliers are subject to compliance with our Supplier Code of Conduct.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedRisk Factors
Due Additionally, due to the uncertainty involved in price movements and potential deviation from historical pricing, Xcel Energy is unable to fully assure that its our risk management programs and procedures would may not be effective to protect against all significant adverse market deviations. fluctuations and our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows could be materially impacted.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedRisk Factors
While we carry liability insurance, given an extreme event, if Xcel Energy was found to be liable for wildfire damages, damage amounts could potentially exceed our coverage (as experienced with the Marshall Wildfire settlement in 2025) and negatively impact our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedRisk Factors
More frequent and severe drought conditions, extreme swings in amount and timing of precipitation, changes in availability of vegetation, unseasonably warm temperatures, very low humidity, stronger winds and other environmental factors have increased both the frequency and duration of the wildfire season fire weather conditions and the potential impact of an event.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedRisk Factors
If our regulators do not allow us to recover all or a part of the cost of capital investment or the O&M costs incurred to comply with the mandates, it could have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedRisk Factors
We have programs in place to comply with these regulations and systematically monitor and renew infrastructure over time, regulations, however, a significant incident or material finding of non-compliance could result in penalties and higher costs of operations.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedRisk Factors
Customer adoption of these technologies and increased energy efficiency or other reductions in expected sales growth could result in excess transmission and generation resources, downward pressure on sales growth, and potentially stranded costs if we are not able to fully recover costs and investments.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedRisk Factors
The utility sector is undergoing significant change (e.g., the addition of large loads, increases in energy efficiency, wider adoption of distributed generation and shifts away from fossil fuel generation to renewable generation).
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
AddedMD&A
(a)Includes $2 million of interest costs associated with short-term debt used to pay settlement, which is presented as interest expense on the consolidated statements of income.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
AddedMD&A
Weather — Estimated impact of temperature variations on EPS compared with normal weather conditions:2025 vs. Normal 2024 vs. Normal 2025 vs. 2024
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
AddedMD&A
O&M Expenses — O&M expenses increased $192 million in 2025 primarily due to increased benefits and healthcare costs, wildfire mitigation (largely offset in non-fuel rider revenue), nuclear generation costs and insurance costs.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
AddedMD&A
(a)Amounts primarily include gains from debt repurchases, partially offset by taxes.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
AddedMD&A
Natural Gas Innovation Act Rider Recovers costs for pilot projects and research programs aimed at innovative technologies and emission-reducing gas initiatives in Minnesota. The approved plan spans a five-year period beginning in 2025.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
AddedMD&A
In August 2025, eight parties filed testimony. The DOC, OAG, XLI, the CUB, Walmart and Joint Intervenors were the only parties to quantify recommended financial adjustments. The DOC and XLI recommended $306 million and $190 million of adjustments, respectively, largely based on a reduction in ROE, certain O&M expenses and other costs offset in trackers. Other parties recommended adjustments based on reduced ROE and issue specific recommendations.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
AddedMD&A
In October 2025, NSP-Minnesota filed rebuttal testimony, updating its total revenue request to $365 million. Of NSP-Minnesota’s proposed adjustments, approximately $100 million relates to depreciation expense and $50 million are largely offset in trackers. In November 2025, the DOC filed surrebuttal testimony, re-asserting their proposed ROE of 9.25%.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
AddedMD&A
An ALJ report is expected in April 2026, with a MPUC decision expected in the third quarter of 2026.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
AddedMD&A
(Millions of Dollars) Electric Natural Gas NSP-Wisconsin’s filed two-year rate request $ 151 $ 24 PSCW decision: Capital investments (8) (1) ROE adjustment (7) (1) O&M expenses (5) (1) Nuclear decommissioning accrual update (a) (6) — Excess liability insurance deferral recovery 4 1 Other, net (3) — Total revenue change $ 126 $ 22
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
AddedMD&A
(a)Since filing the case, the MPUC authorized a reduction to the annual nuclear decommissioning accrual. This reduction, which flows to NSP-Wisconsin through the interchange agreement, reduced the NSP-Wisconsin rate request and is earnings neutral.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
AddedMD&A
•In December 2025, NSP-Minnesota and NSP-Wisconsin jointly issued an RFP seeking up to 3,500 MW of wind, solar, hydro, standalone storage, or hybrid capacity that will achieve commercial operation by December 31, 2030. Additionally, NSP-Minnesota is seeking to procure up to 600 MW of solar or solar + storage capacity that will achieve commercial operation by December 31, 2029, and meet Minnesota’s Distributed Solar Energy Standard eligibility requirements. Bids are due in March 2026, and filing for MPUC approval is expected by the end of 2026, ahead of the established procedural schedule.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
AddedMD&A
•NSP-Minnesota and NSP-Wisconsin may continue to file additional RFPs throughout 2026 and 2027 for resource needs as part of its Upper Midwest resource planning efforts.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedMD&A
Workforce Reduction — In 2023, Xcel Energy implemented workforce actions to align resources and investments with our evolving business and customer needs and streamline the organization for long-term success. Xcel Energy initiated a Voluntary Retirement Program, under which approximately 400 eligible non-bargaining employees retired. Xcel Energy also eliminated approximately 150 non-bargaining employees through an involuntary severance program. Workforce reduction expenses of $72 million were recorded in the fourth quarter of 2023.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedMD&A
Each degree of temperature above 65° Fahrenheit is counted as one CDD, and each degree of temperature below 65° Fahrenheit is counted as one HDD.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedMD&A
O&M Expenses — O&M expenses increased $96 million in 2024 primarily due to operational activities, including generation maintenance, storm response, wildfire mitigation costs and damage prevention. The impact of prior year regulatory deferrals also contributed to increased O&M expenses, partially offset by lower labor and benefit costs and lower bad debt expenses.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedMD&A
State Energy Policy Electric Rider Recovers costs associated with the Prairie Island Legislation settlement and the Reliability Administrator/ Sustainable Building Guidelines in Minnesota.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedMD&A
In June 2024, NSP-Minnesota and various parties filed an uncontested settlement, which includes the following terms:
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedMD&A
In October 2024, an ALJ recommended the MPUC approve the rate case settlement. In February 2025, the MPUC verbally approved the settlement agreement. NSP-Minnesota expects to implement a rate increase of $50 million (trued up for 2024 weather normalized actual sales) in July 2025.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedMD&A
Wisconsin Energy Efficiency Program The primary energy efficiency program is funded by the utilities, but operated by independent contractors subject to oversight by the PSCW and utilities. NSP-Wisconsin recovers these costs from customers.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedMD&A
Wisconsin 2025 Stay-Out Proposal — In June 2024, NSP-Wisconsin filed a 2025 stay-out proposal with the PSCW. In December 2024, the PSCW approved NSP-Wisconsin’s filing, which offsets $27 million in electric deficiencies and $3 million in natural gas deficiencies by amortizing IRA deferrals, stopping a deferral related to IRA benefits ordered in a previous rate case, and deferring revenue requirement impacts of two natural gas capital projects.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedMD&A
Resource Acquisition — In February 2024, NSP filed its Upper Midwest Resource Plan with the MPUC. In October 2024, NSP-Minnesota filed a settlement with several parties reaching agreement on the resource plan, as well as the proposed projects to be approved in the pending 800 MW firm dispatchable resource acquisition.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedMD&A
In February 2025, the MPUC verbally approved the terms of the settlement agreement, including:
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedMD&A
•The selection of the company owned 300 MW 4-hour Sherco battery energy storage system.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RemovedMD&A
•The addition of 3,200 MW of wind, 400 MW of solar and 600 MW of stand-alone storage to be added through 2030 based on an RFP process (a portion of which is expected to be fulfilled with the resources acquired as part of the 2024 RFPs). Of these amounts, approximately 2,800 MW of wind are projected to utilize the Minnesota Energy Connection transmission line.
Read it in 10-K 2025-02-27 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedMD&A
(Millions of Dollars) 2025 vs. 2024 vs. 2023 Non-fuel riders $ 250 Recovery of lower higher cost of electric fuel and purchase purchased power (479) 214 PTCs flowed back to customers (offset by lower ETR) (302) Wholesale generation 172 Regulatory rate outcomes (MN, ND) 116 Sales and demand 97 Transmission revenues (96) 79 Sherco Unit 3 2011 outage refunds (47) Regulatory rate outcomes (MN, CO, TX, and NM) 372 Non-fuel riders 169 47 Estimated impact of weather (39) Conservation and demand side management (offset in expense) 102 Estimated impact of weather (net of sales true-up) 24 (38) Other, net (42) 115 Total decrease increase $ (299) 1,013
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedMD&A
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share 2025 2024 2023 NSP-Minnesota $ 1.53 $ 1.41 $ 1.28 PSCo 1.15 1.39 1.26 SPS 0.70 0.67 0.70 NSP-Wisconsin 0.27 0.24 0.25 Earnings from equity method investments — WYCO 0.03 0.04 0.03 Regulated utility (a) 3.65 3.76 3.52 Xcel Energy Inc. and Other (0.23) (0.33) (0.31) GAAP Diluted diluted EPS (a) $ 3.42 $ 3.44 3.21 Loss on Comanche Unit 3 litigation — 0.05 Workforce reduction expenses — 0.09 Sherco Unit 3 2011 outage refunds — 0.06 Marshall Wildfire settlement 0.38 — Ongoing Diluted diluted EPS (a) $ 3.80 $ 3.50 $ 3.35
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedMD&A
(Millions of Dollars) 2025 vs. 2024 vs. 2023 Recovery of lower higher cost of natural gas $ (496) 92 Regulatory rate outcomes (CO) 84 Conservation revenue (offset in expense) 47 Estimated impact of weather (net of decoupling) (35) 11 Retail sales decline (net of decoupling) (1) Regulatory rate outcomes (MN, WI, CO, and ND) 91 Infrastructure and integrity riders 8 (13) Other, net 18 1 Total decrease increase $ (415) 222
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedMD&A
Twelve Months Ended Dec. 31, 2024 2025 Diluted Earnings (Loss) GAAP Diluted EPS Impact of Adjustments Ongoing Diluted EPS Per Share NSP-Minnesota $ 1.41 1.53 $ 0.06 $ 1.47 1.53 PSCo 1.39 1.15 0.38 1.53 SPS 0.67 — 1.39 SPS 0.70 0.67 NSP-Wisconsin 0.27 — 0.70 NSP-Wisconsin 0.24 — 0.24 0.27 Earnings from equity method investments — WYCO 0.03 — 0.03 Regulated utility (a) 3.76 0.06 3.83 3.65 0.38 4.03 Xcel Energy Inc. and Other (0.33) (0.23) — (0.33) (0.23) Total (a) $ 3.44 0.06 3.42 0.38 $ 3.50 3.80
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedMD&A
The In December 2025, the MPSC issued a final written approval of the settlement order includes an electric order, with a final rate increase of $1.75 $1.6 million in 2025 and a step increase of $0.55 ($0.7 million in 2026, with an incremental $0.9 million in 2027) based on a ROE of 9.8% and an equity ratio of 50%.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedMD&A
Senior Unsecured Notes $ 1,000 10 Year First Quarter PSCo First Mortgage Bonds 2,000 10 Year & Second & Third Quarter 30 Year 2,400 NSP-Minnesota First Mortgage Bonds 1,100 10 Year & First & Third Quarter 30 Year 1,000 SPS First Mortgage Bonds 450 30 Year Second Quarter 1,000 NSP-Wisconsin First Mortgage Bonds 250 30 Year Second Quarter
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedMD&A
Comanche Unit 3 Marshall Wildfire Litigation — In the third quarter of 2023, 2025, PSCo recognized a non-recurring $34 $287 million charge as a result of a jury verdict settlement reached with the plaintiffs in Denver County District Court awarding CORE Electric Cooperative lost power damages and other costs. the Marshall Wildfire litigation.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedMD&A
(Millions of Dollars) 2025 2024 2023 GAAP net income $ 2,018 $ 1,936 $ 1,771 Loss on Comanche Unit 3 litigation — 35 Workforce reduction expenses — 72 Sherco Unit 3 2011 outage refunds — 47 Marshall Wildfire litigation (a) 298 — Less: tax effect of adjustments (77) (13) (27) Ongoing earnings (a) (b) $ 2,239 $ 1,969 $ 1,851
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedMD&A
In November 2024, February 2026, the NDPSC approved a settlement, reflecting settlement agreement filed by NSP-Minnesota and NDPSC Staff, effective April 1st, 2026, including a natural gas rate base revenue increase of $7.2 million (8.0%), $24 million, based on a ROE of 9.9% 9.8% and an equity ratio of 52.5%.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedMD&A
Excess Liability Insurance Deferral – In February March 2025, NSP-Wisconsin SPS filed a request with the PSCW PUCT and in April 2025, SPS filed a request with the NMPRC for deferred accounting treatment for incremental excess liability insurance expense of $9.6 million incurred as a result of the October 2024 policy renewal. renewal, estimated at approximately $30 million across the two jurisdictions.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedMD&A
NSP-Minnesota and NSP-Wisconsin announced the short listed projects in January 2025 and plan to file filed for the requisite approvals of the selected resources with the MPUC and PSCW, respectively, in the second half fourth quarter of 2025. 2025 (decision expected in early 2026);
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
RewordedMD&A
(Millions of Dollars) Twelve Months Ended Dec. 31 Components of change — 2025 vs. 2024 vs. 2023 Cash provided by financing activities —2023 —2024 $ 617 2,837 Higher long-term debt issuances, net of repayments 1,512 1,059 Higher net short-term debt proceeds 945 Higher proceeds from issuance of common stock 847 Higher dividends paid to shareholders (83) 2,232 Other financing activities (56) (92) Cash provided by financing activities — 2024 2025 $ 2,837 6,981
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗
Quiet changesMD&A
Xcel Energy generally expects to fund additional capital investment with approximately 40% equity and 60% debt.
Read it in 10-K 2026-02-25 at sec.gov ↗