tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

MCHPMicrochip Technology

Technology · Semiconductors · Nasdaq
Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

2 reviews of MCHP's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
2
latest letter 2024-02-06
Questions asked
5
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
0
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023

2024-02-06 to 2024-02-15 · 4 questions · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2024-02-15
RevenueNon-GAAP measuresInventoryReserves and insurance
Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2023 · Note 2. Net Sales, page F-17
SEC asked (1)
We note that in your Investor Presentations included on your website, and on your earnings call for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2023, you discuss revenue by end market for fiscal 2023 and 2022 for industrial, data center and computing, consumer appliance, automotive, and communications infrastructure.
Rest of the question

Please tell us your consideration of disclosing the revenues recognized for each end market in the notes to the financial statements as disaggregated revenue under the guidance in ASC 606-10-50-5. Refer also to the guidance in ASC 606-10-55-89 through 91.

MCHP answered
On behalf of Microchip Technology Incorporated (the “Company”), we have attached the Company’s response to the comments of the Staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission set forth in the Staff’s letter dated February 6, 2024 relating to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023 and Form 8-K furnished on February 1, 2024. If you should have any questions regarding the Company’s response, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (512) 338-5439. One letter for all the questions, without numbered answers. Read the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2024-02-14: 10-K filed 2024-05-23 ↗, against the 10-K filed 2023-05-25 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Note 8. Other Financial Statement Details, page F-28
SEC asked (2)
We note that inventory concerns are discussed throughout the last few quarters earnings calls. We also note your comment in the third quarter earnings call that you have been taking relatively large charges for inventory reserves based on your accounting policies that you have in place.
Rest of the question

Please revise future filings to disclose the amount of any significant losses that result from the subsequent measurement of inventory, in accordance with the guidance in ASC 330-10-50-2.

MCHP answered

See the reply above.

In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2024-02-14: 10-K filed 2024-05-23 ↗, against the 10-K filed 2023-05-25 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Exhibit 99.1 Earnings Release · Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2024 Outlook, page 5
SEC asked (3)
We note that your disclosure on page 5 includes non-GAAP guidance for FY 2024. We also note you have a column disclosing the range of the non-GAAP adjustments. Please revise future filings to include a description of the nature of the non-GAAP adjustments included in that amount.
MCHP answered

See the reply above.

In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2024-02-14: 10-K filed 2024-05-23 ↗, against the 10-K filed 2023-05-25 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Reconciliation of GAAP Operating Expenses to Non-GAAP Operating Expenses · Reconciliation of GAAP Operating Income to Non-GAAP Operating Income, page 11
SEC asked (4)
We note that your most significant adjustment in these Non-GAAP reconciliations is for the amortization of acquired intangible assets. Please revise future filings to disclose the nature of what is included in the adjustment and the fact that although you are removing the amortization expense in this measure, the revenue associated with these assets is included in the measure.
MCHP answered

See the reply above.

In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2024-02-14: 10-K filed 2024-05-23 ↗, against the 10-K filed 2023-05-25 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2024-02-15

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2019

2019-09-24 to 2019-12-09 · 1 question · 1 letter from the SEC, 1 from the company
Review closed 2019-12-09
RevenueNon-GAAP measuresInventory
After reviewing your response to this comment, we may have additional comments. Exhibit 99.1, page 1
SEC asked
Please refer to comment two of our letter dated November 20, 2018. We note that your earnings releases continue to present the measure “non-GAAP net sales” which is adjusted for the impact of changes in distributor inventory levels even though you agreed to remove the measure in your filings for periods beginning after December 31, 2018. As such, we reissue the comment.
Rest of the question

Please revise all future filings to remove references to non- GAAP net sales since non-GAAP measures that reflect the impact of changes in distributor inventory levels substitute individually tailored revenue recognition and measurement methods for those of GAAP and do not comply with the guidance in Question 100.04 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations on Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

MCHP answered
In response to the Staff’s comment, in future filings, the Company will remove disclosures of non-GAAP net sales amounts.

By: /s/ J. Eric Bjornholt

J. Eric Bjornholt, Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2019-09-30: 10-Q filed 2019-11-06 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2019-08-07 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: closing letter, 2019-12-09

Other letters

Letters without questions

UPLOAD and CORRESP
1 other letter: notices that a filing will not be reviewed, requests to declare a registration effective, and the like
  • 2019-03-07 · SEC: review completed · Microchip Technology, Inc. · Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2018 ·...

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 10 letters filed since 2019-03-07. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →