tickdelta
Sign in

Tickdelta is free for now. Sign up and get Pro free

← Screener

BKNGBooking Holdings

Consumer discretionary · Travel Services · Nasdaq
Compare with peers → Embed
SEC comment letters, last 20 years

1 review of BKNG's filings by SEC staff

UPLOAD and CORRESP
ReviewsRead ↓
1
latest letter 2019-06-25
Questions asked
2
each answered in the company's own letter
No closing letter
0
reviews without a letter saying the staff completed it

When the SEC's staff reviews a filing, it writes to the company with numbered questions, and the company answers each one in a letter. SEC publishes the exchange once the review is over, at least 20 business days later. A question is not an accusation; most reviews end with the company adding detail to its next filing.

Form 10-K

2019-06-25 to 2019-10-22 · 2 questions · 2 letters from the SEC, 4 from the company
Review closed 2019-10-22
SegmentsRevenueNon-GAAP measures
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies · Segment Reporting, page 83
SEC asked
Please tell us in detail how you determined all of your operating segments or brands are properly aggregated into one reportable segment. Please be sure to address each of the aggregation criteria in ASC 280-10-50-11.
BKNG answered
In accordance with your recent conversation with a representative of Booking Holdings Inc. (the “Company”), the Company will respond to your letter addressed to Glenn D. Fogel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, dated June 25, 2019, relating to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, on or before July 24, 2019.

Best Regards,

/s/ Stephen Sonne

Stephen Sonne

Senior Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Corporate Secretary Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2019-07-02: 10-Q filed 2019-08-07 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2019-05-09 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies · Segment Reporting, page 83
SEC asked
We have reviewed your response to our comment. Please provide additional quantitative information in support of your assertion that the various operating segments or brands have similar economic characteristics. For example, we understand that Adjusted EBITDA is a profitability measure used by the CODM to assess the performance of the brands, thus data regarding historical and estimated future Adjusted EBITDA margin
Rest of the question

by brand should be provided. Please tell us what other profitability measures are used by the CODM to assess the performance of the brands and provide similar quantitative data with respect to these measures by brand. While we note your point that the “take rate” for your “core online travel company brands” demonstrate similar long-term financial performance, it is unclear whether “take rate” is a measure used by the CODM to assess operating segment performance. Moreover, we note this metric does not apply to the KAYAK, OpenTable and Rentalcars.com brands/operating segments and you have not provided any quantitative data in support of the economic similarity of these brands to each other or your other core online travel company brands, but rather you have pointed out the relative quantitative immateriality of these brands to consolidated revenues and Adjusted EBITDA. If your position with respect to the aggregation of these brands with your core online travel company brands is their quantitative immateriality, please tell us your consideration of the guidance in ASC 280-10-50-13 and 50-15 with respect to your segment presentation of these brands.

BKNG answered
In accordance with your recent conversation with a representative of Booking Holdings Inc. (the “Company”), the Company will respond to your letter addressed to Glenn D. Fogel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, dated July 29, 2019, relating to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, on or before September 6, 2019.

Best Regards,

/s/ Stephen Sonne

Stephen Sonne

Senior Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Corporate Secretary Read in the reply ↗
In its next report

First report after the company's reply of 2019-08-09: 10-Q filed 2019-11-07 ↗, against the 10-Q filed 2019-05-09 ↗.

Tickdelta does not hold the text of both reports, so they are not compared here.

Also in this review: company letter, 2019-07-23, company letter, 2019-09-06, closing letter, 2019-10-22

From the SEC's correspondence on EDGAR: staff letters (form UPLOAD) and company letters (form CORRESP), 14 letters filed since 2017-08-04. Questions and answers are matched by their numbers; topics come from words in each question. The reports are compared word for word (same form, before the first SEC letter against the first report after the company's reply). No AI.

Next in Owners and insiders Insider trades →