Added10-Q 2026-11-06 vs 10-K 2026-03-25
As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.
TRONTron Inc.
Tron Inc. (formerly SRM Entertainment, Inc.), is a publicly traded company pioneering blockchain-integrated treasury strategies. 10-K, Item 1
- Headquarters
- Winter Park, FL
134 paragraphs in Risk Factors of the 10-K filed Mar 25, 2026 with nothing like them in the 10-K filed Mar 31, 2025. Quoted exactly. Paragraphs that were only edited are under 10-K change.
Compared with the Risk Factors in the latest 10-K of the other 31 Crypto companies: a paragraph with at least half its words the same at another company is called similar, and the companies are listed under it. A paragraph most of them have is marked boilerplate. No line means no other company has one like it. This counts text; it does not say how serious a risk is.
● changes in the pricing policies of, or the introduction of new products by, us or our competitors;
● introductions of new technologies and changes in consumer preferences that result in either unanticipated or unexpectedly rapid product category shifts;
● slow or negative growth in the toy, souvenir, theme park, and related markets;
● delays in the introduction of new products by us or market acceptance of these products;
● unanticipated decreases or delays in purchases of our products by our significant retailers, distributors and other channel partners;
● unanticipated increases in costs, including air freight, associated with shipping and delivery of our products;
● the inability to maintain stable operations by our suppliers and other parties with whom we have commercial relationships;
● discovery of security vulnerabilities in our products, services or systems, leading to negative publicity, decreased demand or potential liability;
● foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations in the jurisdictions where we transact sales and expenditures in local currency;
● changes in or consolidation of our sales channels and wholesale distributor relationships or failure to manage our sales channel inventory and warehousing requirements;
● delay or failure of our retailers, distributors and other channel partners to purchase at their historic volumes or at the volumes that they or we forecast;
Read in the 10-K ↗
● changes in U.S. and international tax policy, including changes that adversely affect customs, tax or duty rates, as well as income tax legislation and regulations that affect the countries where we conduct business;
● operational disruptions, such as transportation delays or failure of our order processing system, particularly if they occur at the end of a fiscal quarter;
● disruptions or delays related to our financial and enterprise resource planning systems;
● our inability to accurately forecast product demand, resulting in increased inventory exposure;
● allowance for doubtful accounts exposure with our existing retailers, distributors and other channel partners and new retailers, distributors and other channel partners, particularly as we expand into new international markets;
● geopolitical disruption, including sudden changes in immigration policies, leading to disruption in our workforce or delay or even stoppage of our operations in manufacturing, transportation, technical support and research and development;
● terms of our contracts with channel partners or suppliers that cause us to incur additional expenses or assume additional liabilities;
● an increase in price protection claims, redemptions of marketing rebates, product warranty and stock rotation returns or allowance for doubtful accounts;
● epidemic or widespread product failure, or unanticipated safety issues, in one or more of our products;
● failure to effectively manage our third-party customer support partners, which may result in customer complaints and/or harm to the Company’s brand;
● our inability to monitor and ensure compliance with our code of ethics, our anti-corruption compliance program and domestic and international anti-corruption laws and regulations, whether in relation to our employees or with our suppliers or retailers, distributors or other channel partners;
● workplace or human rights violations in certain countries in which our third-party manufacturers or suppliers operate, which may affect the Company’s brand and negatively affect our products’ acceptance by consumers;
● unanticipated shifts or declines in profit by geographical region that would adversely impact our tax rate;
● failure to implement and maintain the appropriate internal controls over financial reporting, which may result in restatements of our financial statements; and
Read in the 10-K ↗
We may face risks relating to the lack of the PCAOB inspection on our auditor, which may cause our securities to be delisted from a U.S. stock exchange or prohibited from being traded over-the-counter in the future under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the HFCAA, if the SEC determines that we have filed any annual report containing an audit report issued by a registered public accounting firm that the PCAOB has determined it is unable to inspect or investigate completely for three consecutive years beginning in 2021. On June 22, 2021, the U.S. Senate passed the Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act and on December 29, 2022, a legislation entitled “Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023” (the “Consolidated Appropriations Act”) was signed into law by President Biden, which contained, among other things, an identical provision to Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act and amended the HFCAA by requiring the SEC to prohibit an issuer’s securities from trading on any U.S. stock exchanges if its auditor is not subject to PCAOB inspections for two consecutive years instead of three, thus reducing the time before our securities may be prohibited from trading or delisted. The delisting or the cessation of trading of our securities, or the threat of their delisted or prohibited from being trade, may materially and adversely affect the value of your investment.
On December 16, 2021, the PCAOB issued a determination report which found that the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in: (1) mainland China of the PRC; and (2) Hong Kong, a Special Administrative Region of the PRC, because of positions taken by PRC authorities in those jurisdictions, which determinations were vacated on December 15, 2022. Our current auditor, M&K CPAS, PLLC, is headquartered in Texas, the United States, and was not identified by the PCAOB in its report on December 16, 2021 as a firm subject to the PCAOB’s determinations, which determinations were vacated on December 15, 2022.
If the PCAOB in the future determines it is unable to inspect and investigate completely our auditor, then the lack of access to the PCAOB inspection would prevent the PCAOB from fully evaluating audits and quality control procedures of our auditor. As a result, investors could be deprived of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections. The inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of our auditor would make it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of these accounting firms’ audit procedures or quality control procedures, which could cause existing and potential investors in our stock to lose confidence in our audit procedures and reported financial information and the quality of our financial statements. Although our auditor was not identified by the PCAOB in its report as a firm subject to the PCAOB’s determinations, which determinations were vacated on December 15, 2022, should the PCAOB be unable to fully conduct inspection of our auditor’s work papers, this could adversely affect us and our securities for the reasons noted above.
Our auditor, the independent registered public accounting firm that issues the audit report included elsewhere in this Annual Report, as an auditor of companies that are traded publicly in the U.S. and a firm registered with the PCAOB, is subject to laws in the U.S. pursuant to which the PCAOB conducts regular inspections to assess our auditor’s compliance with the applicable professional standards. Our auditor is headquartered in Texas, the United States and has been inspected by the PCAOB on a regular basis. However, the recent developments would add uncertainties to our offerings and we cannot assure you whether Nasdaq or regulatory authorities would apply additional and more stringent criteria to us after considering the effectiveness of our auditor’s audit procedures and quality control procedures, adequacy of personnel and training, or sufficiency of resources, geographic reach or experience as it relates to the audit of our financial statements.
Immediately after August Warrant Exercise in connection with the June Securities Purchase Agreement, Bravemorning held approximately 86.6% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock, and also Preferred Stock Shares which vote together with the Common Stock and increased Bravemorning’s aggregate voting power to 92.5%. Bravemorning holds supermajority voting power and may take actions that may not be in the best interests of our other stockholders.
On August 29, 2025, in connection with the August Warrant Exercise, the Company issued 220,000,000 shares of Common Stock to Bravemorning, making it the holder of approximately 86.6% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock. Upon the August Warrant Exercise in connection with the June Securities Purchase Agreement, Bravemorning also held 100,000 Preferred Stock Shares, which are convertible into an additional 200,000,000 shares of Common Stock and which vote on an as-converted basis with the Common Stock; and Bravemorning’s ownership of Common Stock and Preferred Stock gave it an aggregate voting power of 92.5%. As a result, Bravemorning is able to control the management and affairs of the Company and matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. The interests of Bravemorning may not be the same as or may even conflict with your interests. For example, Bravemorning could attempt to delay or prevent a change in control of us, even if such change in control would benefit our other stockholders, which could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their Common Stock as part of a sale of us or our assets, and might affect the prevailing market price of our Common Stock due to investors’ perceptions that conflicts of interest may exist or arise. As a result, this concentration of ownership may not be in the best interests of our other stockholders.
We may regularly encounter potential conflicts of interest, and our failure to identify and address such conflicts of interest could adversely affect our business.
Similar paragraph at 1 of 31 other Crypto companies: GMEWe face the possibility of actual, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest in the ordinary course of our business operations.
Conflicts of interest may exist between (i) our different businesses; (ii) us and our stakeholders; or (iii) us and our affiliates. As we expand the scope of our business it is critical for us to be able to timely address potential conflicts of interest, including situations where two or more interests within our businesses naturally exist but are in competition or conflict. We have put in place internal control and risk management procedures that are designed to identify and address conflicts of interest, including a procedure for presenting potential conflicts of interest to the audit committee of our Board. However, appropriately identifying and managing actual, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest is complex and difficult, and our reputation and our stakeholders’ confidence in us could be damaged if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with one or more actual, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest. It is possible that actual, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest could also give rise to client dissatisfaction, litigation, or regulatory enforcement actions. Regulatory scrutiny of, or litigation in connection with, conflicts of interest could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, which could materially and adversely affect our business in a number of ways, including a reluctance of some potential counterparties to do business with us. Any of the foregoing could materially and adversely affect our reputation, business, financial condition, and results of operations.
A conflict of interest occurs when an individual’s private interest (or the interest of a member of his or her family or close friend(s) or business associate(s)) interferes, or even appears to interfere, with the interests of our company as a whole. A conflict of interest can arise when an employee, officer or director (or a member of his or her family or a close friend(s) or business associate(s)) takes actions or has interests that may make it difficult to perform his or her work for our company objectively and effectively. Conflicts of interest also arise when an employee, officer or director (or a member of his or her family or close friend(s) or business associate(s)) receives improper personal benefits as a result of his or her position in our company.
Specific potential conflicts of interest may arise from the following relationships:
we engaged BiT Global, a licensed Trust or Company Service Provider and registered trust company in Hong Kong, to set up the Treasury Wallet. Our director, Zhihong Liu, is one of the directors of BiT Global. some of our directors have certain ties with the TRON blockchain ecosystem. For example, Weike Sun is the father of Justin Sun, the founder of TRON. Zhihong Liu has been the senior advisor to TRON DAO since 2021. Zi Yang holds senior position for Tronscan, the official blockchain explorer for Tron protocol.
Directors and executive officers must seek determinations and prior authorizations or approvals of potential conflicts of interest exclusively from our audit committee. All other employees are required to approach our Chief Executive Officer or our Chief Financial Officer if they have any questions about reporting a suspected conflict of interest.
The TRX token is a highly volatile asset, and fluctuations in the price of the TRX token are likely to affect our financial results and the market price of our listed securities.
Similar paragraph at 12 of 31 other Crypto companies: ABTC, ASST, BKKT, CLSK, CORZ, DJT, HUT, HYPD and 4 moreAll digital assets, including the TRX token, are highly volatile assets, and fluctuations in the price of the TRX token are likely to continue to affect our financial results and the market price of our listed securities. The trading price of the TRX token has experienced substantial volatility historically. In 2021, the trading price of the TRX token reached a high of approximately $0.18 in April, but it declined to a low of approximately $0.05 in November 2022, representing a drawdown of approximately 75%. More recently, during 2024, the TRX token appreciated significantly, rising from approximately $0.11 in January 2024 to a high of approximately $0.44 in December 2024, a gain of approximately 309%. After significant price correction, the trading price of the TRX token reached approximately $0.284271 by the end of 2025. As of March 18, 2026, the closing price of the TRX token was approximately $0.304394, which was an increase of approximately 7% from the price by the end of 2025. These figures are non-exhaustive examples that illustrate that the market price of TRX token has exhibited, and may continue to exhibit, rapid and substantial increases or decreases over relatively short periods, which could materially and adversely affect the value of our holdings directly and the trading price of our securities indirectly. The price figures and percentage change figures above are based on the historical data file downloaded from the CoinMarketCap TRON Historical Data page.
Our financial results and the market price of our listed securities would be adversely affected, and our business and financial condition would be negatively impacted, if the price of TRX tokens decreased substantially, including as a result of:
decreased user and investor confidence in the TRX token, including due to the various factors described herein;
investment and trading activities, such as (i) trading activities of highly active retail and institutional users and investors; and (ii) actual or expected significant dispositions of TRX tokens by large holders, including the expected liquidation of digital assets associated with entities that have filed for bankruptcy protection and the transfer and sale of TRX tokens associated with significant hacks, seizures, or forfeitures; negative publicity, media or social media coverage, or sentiment due to events in or relating to, or perception of, TRON blockchain, TRX tokens or the broader digital assets industry, for example, (i) public perception that blockchains can be used as a platform to circumvent sanctions, including sanctions imposed on Russia or certain regions related to the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, or to fund criminal or terrorist activities, such as the purported use of digital assets by Hamas to fund its terrorist attack against Israel in October 2023; (ii) expected or pending civil, criminal, regulatory enforcement or other high profile actions against major participants in the TRON ecosystem, if any; and (iii) additional filings for bankruptcy protection or bankruptcy proceedings of major digital asset industry participants, such as the bankruptcy proceeding of FTX Trading and its affiliates; changes in consumer preferences and the perceived value or prospects of the TRX token; competition from other digital assets that exhibit better speed, security, scalability, or energy efficiency, that feature other more favored characteristics, that are backed by governments, including the U.S. government, or reserves of fiat currencies, or that represent ownership or security interests in physical assets; a decrease in the price of other digital assets, including stablecoins, or the crash or unavailability of stablecoins that are used as a medium of exchange for TRX token purchase and sale transactions, such as the crash of the stablecoin Terra USD in 2022, to the extent the decrease in the price of such other digital assets or the unavailability of such stablecoins may cause a decrease in the price of TRX tokens or adversely affect investor confidence in digital assets generally; developments relating to the TRON protocol, including (i) changes to the TRON protocol that impact its security, speed, scalability, usability, or value, such as changes to the cryptographic security protocol underpinning the TRON blockchain, changes to the maximum number of TRX tokens outstanding, changes to the mutability of transactions, changes relating to the size of blockchain blocks, and similar changes, (ii) failures to make upgrades to the TRON protocol to adapt to security, technological, legal or other challenges, and (iii) changes to the TRON protocol that introduce software bugs, security risks or other elements that adversely affect TRX tokens; disruptions, failures, unavailability, or interruptions in service of trading venues for TRX tokens, such as, for example, the announcement by the digital asset exchange FTX Trading that it would freeze withdrawals and transfers from its accounts and subsequent filing for bankruptcy protection and the SEC enforcement action brought against Binance Holdings Ltd., which initially sought to freeze all of its assets during the pendency of the enforcement action and has since resulted in Binance discontinuing all fiat deposits and withdrawals in the U.S.;
the filing for bankruptcy protection by, liquidation of, or market concerns about the financial viability of digital asset custodians, trading venues, lending platforms, investment funds, or other digital asset industry participants, such as the filing for bankruptcy protection by digital asset trading venues FTX Trading and BlockFi and digital asset lending platforms Celsius Network and Voyager Digital Holdings in 2022, the ordered liquidation of the digital asset investment fund Three Arrows Capital in 2022, the announced liquidation of Silvergate Bank in 2023, the government-mandated closure and sale of Signature Bank in 2023, the placement of Prime Trust, LLC into receivership following a cease-and-desist order issued by the Nevada Department of Business and Industry in 2023, and the exit of Binance from the U.S. market as part of its settlement with the Department of Justice and other federal regulatory agencies; regulatory, legislative, enforcement and judicial actions that adversely affect the price, ownership, transferability, trading volumes, legality or public perception of TRX tokens, or that adversely affect the operations of or otherwise prevent digital asset custodians, trading venues, lending platforms or other digital assets industry participants from operating in a manner that allows them to continue to deliver services to the digital assets industry;
the recent resolution of a March 2023 civil enforcement action brought by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that had been pending in the Southern District of New York (the “SEC Action”). Among other claims, the SEC Action had alleged that certain contests, giveaways, and secondary market trading involving TRX tokens in 2018 and 2019 constituted unregistered securities offerings under the law. In February 2025, the SEC Action was stayed by the Court at the request of the parties. On March 9, 2026, pursuant to a global agreement to resolve the matter, the Court entered final judgment which, among other things, dismissed with prejudice the unregistered securities offerings claims concerning TRX tokens; transaction congestion and fees associated with processing transactions on the TRON network; macroeconomic changes, such as changes in the level of interest rates and inflation, fiscal and monetary policies of governments, trade restrictions, and fiat currency devaluations; developments in mathematics or technology, including in digital computing, algebraic geometry and quantum computing, that could result in the cryptography used by the TRON blockchain becoming insecure or ineffective; and changes in national and international economic and political conditions, including, without limitation, federal government policies, trade tariffs and trade disputes, the adverse impacts attributable to the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the economic sanctions adopted in response to the conflict, and the broadening of the Israel-Hamas conflict to other countries in the Middle East.
Similar paragraph at 1 of 31 other Crypto companies: NAKAMost importantly, our TRX token strategy has not been tested over an extended period of time or under different market conditions. Although we are and will be continually examining the risks and rewards of our TRX token strategy, if TRX token prices were to decrease or our TRX token strategy otherwise proves unsuccessful, the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, and the market price of our listed securities would be materially adversely impacted.
The TRX token and other digital assets are novel assets, and are subject to significant legal, commercial, regulatory and technical uncertainty
Similar paragraph at 11 of 31 other Crypto companies: ASST, DFDV, DJT, FWDI, HSDT, HYPD, MSTR, NAKA and 3 moreThe TRX token and other digital assets are relatively novel and are subject to significant uncertainty, which could adversely impact their price. The application of state and federal securities laws and other laws and regulations to digital assets is unclear in certain respects, and it is possible that regulators in the United States or foreign countries may interpret or apply existing laws and regulations in a manner that adversely affects the price of the TRX token or the ability of individuals or institutions (including the Company) to own or transfer TRX tokens.
Similar paragraph at 12 of 31 other Crypto companies: ASST, DFDV, DJT, FWDI, HSDT, HYPD, LITS, MSTR and 4 moreThe U.S. federal government, states, regulatory agencies, and foreign countries may also enact new laws and regulations, or pursue regulatory, legislative, enforcement or judicial actions, that could materially impact the price of the TRX token or the ability of individuals or institutions (including the Company) to own or transfer TRX tokens. For example, within the past several years:
Similar paragraph at 9 of 31 other Crypto companies: DFDV, DJT, HSDT, HYPD, MSTR, NAKA, SBET, SUIG and 1 morePresident Trump signed an executive order instructing a working group comprised of representatives from key federal agencies to evaluate measures that can be taken to provide regulatory clarity and certainty built on technology-neutral regulations for individuals and firms involved in digital assets, including through well-defined jurisdictional regulatory boundaries; the European Union adopted Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (“MiCA”), a comprehensive digital asset regulatory framework for the issuance and use of digital assets; in June 2023, the SEC filed complaints against Binance Holdings Ltd. and Coinbase, Inc., and their respective affiliated entities, relating to, among other claims, that each party was operating as an unregistered securities exchange, broker, dealer, and clearing agency; in November 2023, the SEC filed a complaint against Payward Inc. and Payward Ventures Inc., together known as Kraken, alleging, among other claims, that Kraken’s crypto trading platform was operating as an unregistered securities exchange, broker, dealer, and clearing agency; in June 2023, the United Kingdom adopted and implemented the Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (“FSMA 2023”), which regulates market activities in “cryptoassets;”
in November 2023, Binance Holdings Ltd. and its then chief executive officer reached a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice, CFTC, the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control, and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network to resolve a multi-year investigation by the agencies and a civil suit brought by the CFTC, pursuant to which Binance Holdings Ltd. agreed to, among other things, pay $4.3 billion in penalties across the four agencies and to discontinue its operations in the United States; and in China, the People’s Bank of China and the National Development and Reform Commission have outlawed cryptocurrency mining and declared all cryptocurrency transactions illegal within the country.
It is not possible to predict whether, or when, new laws will be enacted that change the legal framework governing digital assets or provide additional authorities to the SEC or other regulators, or whether, or when, any other federal, state or foreign legislative bodies will take any similar actions. It is also not possible to predict the nature of any such additional laws or authorities, how additional legislation or regulatory oversight might impact the ability of digital asset markets to function, the willingness of financial and other institutions to continue to provide services to the digital assets industry, or how any new laws or regulations, or changes to existing laws or regulations, might impact the value of digital assets generally and TRX tokens specifically. The consequences of any new law or regulation relating to digital assets and digital asset activities could adversely affect the market price of TRX tokens, as well as our ability to hold or transact in TRX tokens, and in turn adversely affect the market price of our listed securities.
Moreover, the risks of engaging in a TRX token strategy are relatively novel and have created, and could continue to create, complications due to the lack of experience that third parties have with companies engaging in such a strategy, such as increased costs of director and officer liability insurance or the potential inability to obtain such coverage on acceptable terms in the future.
Similar paragraph at 9 of 31 other Crypto companies: DJT, FWDI, HSDT, LITS, MSTR, NAKA, SUIG, UPXI and 1 moreThe growth of the digital assets industry in general, and the use and acceptance of the TRX token in particular, may also impact the price of the TRX token and is subject to a high degree of uncertainty. The pace of worldwide growth in the adoption and use of TRX tokens may depend, for instance, on public familiarity with digital assets, ease of buying, accessing or gaining exposure to TRX tokens, institutional demand for TRX tokens as an investment asset, the participation of traditional financial institutions in the digital assets industry, consumer demand for TRX tokens as means of payment, and the availability and popularity of alternatives to the TRX token. Even if growth in TRX token adoption occurs in the near or medium-term, there is no assurance that TRX token usage will continue to grow over the long-term.
Because the TRX token has no physical existence beyond the record of transactions on the TRON blockchain, a variety of technical factors related to the TRON blockchain could also impact the price of the TRX token. For example, malicious attacks by hackers, hard “forks” of the TRX token blockchain into multiple blockchains, and advances in digital computing, algebraic geometry, and quantum computing could undercut the integrity of the TRON blockchain and negatively affect the price of the TRX token. The liquidity of the TRX token may also be reduced and damage to the public perception of the TRX token may occur, if financial institutions were to deny or limit banking services to businesses that hold TRX tokens, provide TRX token-related services or accept the TRX token as payment, which could also decrease the price of the TRX token. Actions by U.S. banking regulators, such as the issuance in February 2023 by Federal banking agencies of the “Interagency Liquidity Risk Statement,” which cautioned banks on contagion risks posed by providing services to digital assets customers, and similar actions, have in the past resulted in or contributed to reductions in access to banking services for cryptocurrency-related customers and service providers, or the willingness of traditional financial institution to participate in markets for digital assets. The liquidity of the TRX token may also be impacted to the extent that changes in applicable laws and regulatory requirements negatively impact the ability of exchanges and trading venues to provide services for TRX tokens and other digital assets.
A significant decrease in the market value of our TRX token holdings could adversely affect our ability to satisfy our financial obligations.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, our toys and souvenir business did not generate positive cash flow from operations. If our toys and souvenir business does not generate cash flow in future periods sufficient to satisfy our financial obligations, including our debt and cash dividend obligations, we intend to fund our obligations using cash flow generated by equity or debt financings. Our ability to achieve the objectives of our TRX token strategy depends in significant part on our ability to obtain equity and debt financing. If we are unable to obtain equity or debt financing on favorable terms or at all, we may not be able to successfully execute on our TRX token strategy.
Our ability to obtain equity or debt financing may in turn depend on, among other factors, the value of our TRX token holdings, investor sentiment and the general public perception of TRX tokens, our strategy and our value proposition. Accordingly, a significant decline in the market value of our TRX token holdings or a negative shift in these other factors may create liquidity and credit risks, as such a decline or such shifts may adversely impact our ability to secure sufficient equity or debt financing to satisfy our financial obligations, including our debt and cash dividend obligations. These risks could materialize at times when the TRX token is trading below its carrying value on our most recent balance sheet or our cost basis. As TRX tokens constitute the vast bulk of assets on our balance sheet, if we are unable to secure equity or debt financing in a timely manner, on favorable terms, or at all, we may be required to sell TRX tokens to satisfy these obligations. Any such sale of TRX token may have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition, and could impair our ability to secure additional equity or debt financing in the future. Our inability to secure additional equity or debt financing in a timely manner, on favorable terms or at all, or to sell our TRX tokens in amounts and at prices sufficient to satisfy our financial obligations, including our debt service and cash dividend obligations, could cause us to default under such obligations. Any default on our current or future indebtedness or preferred stock may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Our historical financial statements do not reflect the potential variability in earnings that we may experience in the future relating to our TRX token holdings.
Given that we have only started adopting the TRON (TRX) treasury strategy since June 2025, our historical financial statements do not reflect the potential variability in earnings that we may experience in the future from holding or selling significant amounts of TRX tokens. The price of the TRX token has historically been subject to dramatic price fluctuations and is highly volatile. Our TRX token holdings are expected to significantly affect our financial results and if we continue to increase our overall holdings of TRX tokens in the future, they will have an even greater impact on our financial results and the market price of our listed securities. Going forward, we will evaluate and adopt appropriate accounting standards and policies for the preparation of our financial statements, in particular to areas relating to our TRX token holdings.
There has been increasing focus on the extent to which digital assets can be used to launder the proceeds of illegal activities, fund criminal or terrorist activities, or circumvent sanctions regimes, including those sanctions imposed in response to the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine. While we have implemented and maintain policies and procedures reasonably designed to promote compliance with applicable anti-money laundering and sanctions laws and regulations and take care to only acquire our TRX tokens through entities subject to anti-money laundering regulation and related compliance rules in the United States, if we are found to have purchased any of our TRX tokens from bad actors that have used TRX tokens to launder money or persons subject to sanctions, we may be subject to regulatory proceedings and any further transactions or dealings in TRX tokens by us may be restricted or prohibited.
We may incur indebtedness or enter into other financial instruments in the future that may be collateralized by our TRX token holdings. We may also consider pursuing strategies to create income streams or otherwise generate funds using our TRX token holdings. These types of TRX token-related transactions are the subject of enhanced regulatory oversight. These and any other TRX token-related transactions we may enter into, beyond simply acquiring and holding TRX tokens, may subject us to additional regulatory compliance requirements and scrutiny, including under federal and state money services regulations, money transmitter licensing requirements and various commodity and securities laws and regulations.
Additional laws, guidance and policies may be issued by domestic and foreign regulators following the filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection by FTX, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges, in November 2022. While the financial and regulatory fallout from FTX’s collapse did not directly impact our business, financial condition or corporate assets, the FTX collapse may have increased regulatory focus on the digital assets industry. Increased enforcement activity and changes in the regulatory environment, including changing interpretations and the implementation of new or varying regulatory requirements by the government or any new legislation affecting TRX tokens, as well as enforcement actions involving or impacting our trading venues, counterparties and custodians, may impose significant costs or significantly limit our ability to hold and transact in TRX tokens.
In addition, private actors that are wary of the TRX token or the regulatory concerns associated with the TRX token have in the past taken and may in the future take further actions that may have an adverse effect on our business or the market price of our listed securities.
Due to the unregulated nature and lack of transparency surrounding the operations of many TRX token trading venues, TRX token trading venues may experience greater fraud, security failures or regulatory or operational problems than trading venues for more established asset classes, which may result in a loss of confidence in TRX token trading venues and adversely affect the value of our TRX token.
Similar paragraph at 10 of 31 other Crypto companies: BKKT, DJT, FWDI, GLXY, HSDT, HYPD, MARA, MSTR and 2 moreTRX token trading venues are relatively new and, in many cases, unregulated. Furthermore, there are many TRX token trading venues which do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure, management teams, corporate practices and regulatory compliance. As a result, the marketplace may lose confidence in TRX token trading venues, including prominent exchanges that handle a significant volume of TRX token trading and/or are subject to regulatory oversight, in the event one or more TRX token trading venues cease or pause for a prolonged period the trading of TRX token or other digital assets, or experience fraud, significant volumes of withdrawal, security failures or operational problems.
Similar paragraph at 13 of 31 other Crypto companies: ABTC, BKKT, CLSK, DJT, FWDI, GLXY, HSDT, HUT and 5 moreThe concentration of our TRX token holdings enhances the risks inherent in our TRX token strategy.
The vast majority of our assets are concentrated in our TRX token holdings. As of March 18, 2026, the Company holds approximately 549,676,892 Staked TRX (sTRX) tokens and approximately 9,769,626 TRX tokens in the Treasury Wallet. We intend to purchase additional TRX tokens and increase our overall holdings of TRX tokens in the future. The concentration of our TRX token holdings limits the risk mitigation that we could achieve if we were to purchase a more diversified portfolio of treasury assets, and the absence of diversification enhances the risks inherent in our TRX token strategy.
Our holdings of sTRX tokens are subject to risks associated with smart contracts and the TRON blockchain, which could adversely affect their value.
Similar paragraph at 1 of 31 other Crypto companies: EXODWe received and hold sTRX tokens, which are issued and redeemable through a smart-contract protocol. The use of sTRX entails risks inherent in smart contracts, including the possibility of coding errors, security vulnerabilities, or malicious exploits that could result in the partial or total loss of sTRX or the underlying TRX. In addition, risks relating to the TRON blockchain itself, such as congestion, outages, or consensus failures, could disrupt transfers, redemptions, or yield distributions. Further, the staking yield of sTRX consists of standard staking rewards and energy rental income on the TRON blockchain, therefore, any changes to TRON protocol parameters could alter yields, redemption mechanics, or fees in ways that negatively affect the value of sTRX. Any of these risks could materially and adversely affect the value of our sTRX holdings and, by extension, our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Due to Justin Sun’s role as the founder of TRON and his continued association with the TRON blockchain system, his actions and statements may potentially impact the price of TRX, which could in turn impact the Company and the effectiveness of its treasury strategy.
As the founder of TRON, and due to his continued association with the TRON blockchain system, Justin Sun’s actions and statements may potentially impact the price of TRX. While the Company is not aware of any past action or statement by Justin Sun which has had a significant impact on the price of TRX, it is theoretically possible that the market could have interpreted in the past, or interpret in the future, his statements and actions (whether incorrectly in whole or in part) as a factor that could impact the price of TRX. Any such occurrence that impacts the price of TRX would likely also affect the value of the Company’s Common Stock or other securities.
The emergence or growth of other digital assets, including those with significant private or public sector backing, could have a negative impact on the price of TRX tokens and adversely affect our business.
As a result of our TRX token strategy, our assets are concentrated in our TRX token holdings. Accordingly, the emergence or growth of digital assets other than the TRX token (such as Bitcoin and Ethereum) may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Other alternative digital assets that compete with the TRX token in certain ways include “stablecoins,” which are designed to maintain a constant price because of, for instance, their issuers’ promise to hold high-quality liquid assets (such as U.S. dollar deposits and short-term U.S. treasury securities) equal to the total value of stablecoins in circulation. Stablecoins have grown rapidly as a medium of exchange and store of value, particularly on digital asset trading platforms. As of December 31, 2025, two of the eight largest digital assets by market capitalization were U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoins.
Additionally, the introduction of a government-issued digital currency could eliminate or reduce the need or demand for private-sector issued cryptocurrencies, or significantly limit their utility. National governments around the world could introduce central bank digital currencies, which could in turn limit the size of the market opportunity for cryptocurrencies, including TRX tokens.
Our TRX token holdings are less liquid than our existing cash and cash equivalents and may not be able to serve as a source of liquidity for us to the same extent as cash and cash equivalents.
Similar paragraph at 12 of 31 other Crypto companies: ASST, DFDV, DJT, FWDI, HSDT, HYPD, MSTR, NAKA and 4 moreThe TRX tokens are mainly traded on centralized and decentralized cryptocurrency exchange platforms. During times of market instability, we may not be able to sell our TRX tokens at favorable prices or at all. As a result, our TRX token holdings may not be able to serve as a source of liquidity for us to the same extent as cash and cash equivalents. Further, TRX tokens we hold and transact with our trade execution partners does not enjoy the same protections as are available to cash or securities deposited with or transacted by institutions subject to regulation by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation.
Moreover, TRX tokens may be “staked” on various platforms, including centralized cryptocurrency exchanges, or directly on decentralized platforms. “Staking” is a crypto-related process that allows network participants to earn rewards by locking their tokens in wallets. The TRX tokens in the Treasury Wallet are currently “staked” on JustLend, a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol, in exchange for Staked TRX (sTRX) tokens. sTRX token is a derivative token that represents the “staked” TRX tokens, which can automatically generate yield for the token holders. For the avoidance of doubt, the sTRX token does not generate discrete staking rewards. Instead, the economic benefit of staking is reflected through a floating conversion rate between TRX and sTRX, which increases over time based on accrued protocol rewards. While “staking” can generate yields and rewards, there are inherent risks such as (i) smart contract risk – any vulnerabilities of the smart contract may potentially lead to loss of funds, and the redemption of “staked” tokens which is governed by smart contract may be modified by the operator; (ii) interest rate fluctuations – rates can change rapidly based on market conditions, and therefore the amount of yields or rewards is not guaranteed; and (iii) liquidity risk – it may take days or even weeks to release TRX tokens from “staking”. Other than yields and rewards generated from “staking” of the TRX tokens, the TRX token itself does not pay interest or other returns and we can only generate cash from our TRX token holdings if we sell our TRX tokens or implement strategies to create income streams or otherwise generate cash by using our TRX token holdings. Even if we pursue any such strategies, we may be unable to create income streams or otherwise generate cash from our TRX token holdings, and any such strategies may subject us to additional risks.
The TRX tokens staked through JustLend have been voted to super representative nodes on the TRON blockchain. According to Tronscan (the explorer of TRON blockchain), as of March 18, 2026, the TRX tokens which were staked into Staked TRX (sTRX) have been casted votes for the following super representatives: Abra Capital Management, Poloniex, BlockAnalysis, Crypto Labs, and TRONALLIANCE. The voting power was allocated on an approximately equal basis among these nodes. These nodes are identifiable on the TRON blockchain explorer, and the Company does not exercise discretion over the selection beyond the delegation carried out through the JustLend protocol.
Additionally, we may be unable to enter into term loans or other capital raising transactions collateralized by our unencumbered TRX tokens or otherwise generate funds using our TRX token holdings, including in particular during times of market instability or when the price of TRX tokens has declined significantly. If we are unable to sell our TRX tokens, enter into additional capital raising transactions, including capital raising transactions using TRX tokens as collateral, or otherwise generate funds using our TRX token holdings, or if we are forced to sell our TRX tokens at a significant loss, in order to meet our working capital requirements, our business and financial condition could be negatively impacted.
Similar paragraph at 11 of 31 other Crypto companies: ASST, DFDV, DJT, FWDI, HYPD, LITS, MSTR, SBET and 3 moreWe face risks relating to the security of the wallets holding our TRX tokens, including the loss or destruction of private keys required to access our TRX tokens and cyberattacks or other data loss relating to our TRX tokens.
TRX tokens are controllable only by the possessor of both the unique public key and private key(s) relating to the local or online digital wallet in which a TRX token is held. While the TRON blockchain ledger requires a public key relating to a digital wallet to be published when used in a transaction, private keys must be safeguarded and kept private in order to prevent a third party from accessing the TRX tokens held in such wallet. To the extent the private key(s) for a digital wallet are lost, destroyed, or otherwise compromised and no backup of the private key(s) is accessible, we will not be able to access the TRX tokens held in the related digital wallet. Furthermore, we cannot provide assurance that our digital wallets will not be compromised as a result of a cyberattack.
Boilerplate Similar paragraph at 16 of 31 other Crypto companies: ABTC, ASST, BKKT, BMNR, BTBT, CRCL, DJT, GEMI and 8 moreThe limited rights of legal recourse available to us, and our lack of insurance protection expose us and our stockholders to the risk of loss of our digital assets.
Our digital assets are not insured. If our digital assets are lost, stolen or destroyed under circumstances rendering a party liable to us, the responsible party may not have the financial resources sufficient to satisfy our claim. For example, as to a particular event of loss, the only source of recovery for us might be limited, to the extent identifiable, to other responsible third parties (which may include a thief or terrorist), some or all of which may not have the financial resources (including liability insurance coverage) to satisfy a valid claim or may be beyond the reach of available legal recourse. Furthermore, the TRX token is not subject to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) or Securities Investor Protection Corporation protection, which is the protection afforded to depositors at banking institutions. Therefore, a loss may be suffered with respect to our digital assets for which no recourse is available, which could adversely affect our operations and, consequently, an investment in our securities.
If we or our third-party service providers experience a security breach or cyberattack and unauthorized parties obtain access to our TRX tokens, we may lose some or all of our TRX tokens and our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Similar paragraph at 11 of 31 other Crypto companies: ASST, DFDV, DJT, FWDI, HSDT, LITS, MSTR, SBET and 3 moreSecurity breaches and cyberattacks are of particular concern with respect to our TRX tokens. Blockchain-based digital assets have been, and may in the future be, subject to security breaches, cyberattacks, or other malicious activities. A successful security breach or cyberattack could result in a partial or total loss of our TRX tokens. Such a loss could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
As of March 18, 2026, the TRON blockchain and TRX tokens have not experienced any material security breaches or protocol-level cyberattacks that compromised the integrity of the network. TRON currently maintains a public bug bounty program on HackerOne and has undergone an external security audit of its Java-Tron node software by ChainSecurity. However, the TRON blockchain and TRX token, similar to other digital assets and blockchain technologies, may in the future be, subject to security breaches, cyberattacks, or other malicious activities. For example, in November 2022, hackers exploited weaknesses in the security architecture of the FTX Trading digital asset exchange and reportedly stole over $400 million in digital assets from customers. A successful security breach or cyberattack could result in:
a partial or total loss of our TRX tokens; harm to our reputation and brand; improper disclosure of data and violations of applicable data privacy and other laws; or significant regulatory scrutiny, investigations, fines, penalties, and other legal, regulatory, contractual and financial exposure.
Similar paragraph at 10 of 31 other Crypto companies: ASST, DFDV, DJT, FWDI, HSDT, MSTR, SBET, SUIG and 2 moreFurther, any actual or perceived data security breach or cybersecurity attack directed at other companies with digital assets or companies that operate digital asset networks, regardless of whether we are directly impacted, could lead to a general loss of confidence in the broader TRON blockchain ecosystem or in the use of the TRON blockchain to conduct financial transactions, which could negatively impact us.
Similar paragraph at 14 of 31 other Crypto companies: ASST, BTBT, CRCL, DFDV, DJT, FWDI, GEMI, HSDT and 6 moreAttacks upon systems across a variety of industries are increasing in frequency, persistence, and sophistication, and, in many cases, are being conducted by sophisticated, well-funded and organized groups and individuals, including state actors. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized, improper or illegal access to systems and information (including personal data and digital assets), disable or degrade services, or sabotage systems are constantly evolving, may be difficult to detect quickly, and often are not recognized or detected until after they have been launched against a target. These attacks may occur on our systems or those of our third-party service providers or partners. We may experience breaches of our security measures due to human error, malfeasance, insider threats, system errors or vulnerabilities or other irregularities. In particular, unauthorized parties have attempted, and we expect that they will continue to attempt, to gain access to our systems and facilities, as well as those of our partners and third-party service providers, through various means, such as hacking, social engineering, phishing and fraud. In the past, hackers have successfully employed a social engineering attack against one of our service providers and misappropriated our digital assets, although, to date, such events have not been material to our financial condition or operating results. Threats can come from a variety of sources, including criminal hackers, hacktivists, state-sponsored intrusions, industrial espionage, and insiders. In addition, certain types of attacks could harm us even if our systems are left undisturbed. For example, certain threats are designed to remain dormant or undetectable, sometimes for extended periods of time, or until launched against a target and we may not be able to implement adequate preventative measures. Further, there has been an increase in such activities due to the increase in work-from-home arrangements since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The risk of cyberattacks could also be increased by cyberwarfare in connection with the ongoing Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Hamas conflicts, or other future conflicts, including potential proliferation of malware into systems unrelated to such conflicts. Any future breach of our operations or those of others in the digital asset industry, including third-party services on which we rely, could materially and adversely affect our business.
Similar paragraph at 14 of 31 other Crypto companies: ASST, BKKT, BTBT, CRCL, DFDV, DJT, FWDI, GEMI and 6 moreAbsent federal regulations, there is a possibility that the TRX token (either on its own or when offered and sold as part of or subject to an investment contract) may be classified as a “security.” Any such classification of TRX token as a “security” would subject us to additional regulation and could materially impact the operation of our business.
Our assets are concentrated in our TRX token holdings. While neither the SEC nor any other U.S. federal or state regulator has publicly stated whether they agree that the TRX token, either on its own or when offered and sold as part of or subject to an investment contract, is a “security”, if the TRX token is determined to be a “security” in the future, it could lead to our classification as an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), which would subject us to significant additional regulatory controls that could have a material adverse effect on our ability to execute on our TRX token strategy, and our business and operations and may also require us to substantially change the manner in which we conduct our business.
While (for the reasons discussed below) we believe that TRX token, whether on its own or when offered and sold as part of or subject to an investment contract, is not a “security” within the meaning of the U.S. federal securities laws, and registration of the Company under the Investment Company Act is therefore not required under the applicable securities laws, we acknowledge that a regulatory body or federal court may determine otherwise. Our belief, even if reasonable under the circumstances, would not preclude legal or regulatory action based on such a finding that TRX token, whether on its own or when offered and sold as part of or subject to an investment contract, is a “security” which would require us to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.
We have also adapted our process for analyzing the U.S. federal securities law status of the TRX token and other cryptocurrencies over time, as guidance and case law have evolved. As part of our U.S. federal securities law analytical process, we take into account a number of factors, including the various definitions of “security” under U.S. federal securities laws and federal court decisions interpreting the elements of these definitions, such as the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions in the Howey and Reves cases, as well as court rulings, reports, orders, press releases, public statements, and speeches by the SEC Commissioners and SEC Staff providing guidance on when a digital asset or a transaction to which a digital asset may relate may be a security for purposes of U.S. federal securities laws. Our position that TRX token, whether on its own or when offered and sold as part of or subject to an investment contract, is not a “security” is premised, among other reasons, on our conclusion that the TRX token does not meet the elements of the Howey test. Among the reasons for our conclusion that the TRX token is not a security is that holders of TRX tokens do not have a reasonable expectation of profits from our efforts in respect of their holding of TRX tokens. Also, TRX token ownership does not convey the right to receive any interest, rewards, or other returns.
We acknowledge, however, that the SEC, a federal court or another relevant entity could take a different view. Application of securities laws to the specific facts and circumstances of digital assets is complex and subject to change. Our conclusion, even if reasonable under the circumstances, would not preclude legal or regulatory action based on a finding that the TRX token, or any other digital asset we might hold, is a “security.” As such, we are at risk of enforcement proceedings against us, which could result in potential injunctions, cease-and-desist orders, fines, and penalties if the TRX token was determined to be a security by a regulatory body or a court. Such developments could subject us to fines, penalties, and other damages, and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.
Under Sections 3(a)(1)(A) and (C) of the Investment Company Act, a company generally will be deemed to be an “investment company” if (i) it is, or holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities or (ii) it engages, or proposes to engage, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading in securities and it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities, shares of registered money market funds under Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act, and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Rule 3a-1 under the Investment Company Act generally provides that notwithstanding the Section 3(a)(1)(C) test described in clause (ii) above, an entity will not be deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the Investment Company Act if no more than 45% of the value of its assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities, shares of registered money market funds under Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act, and cash items) consists of, and no more than 45% of its net income after taxes (for the past four fiscal quarters combined) is derived from, securities other than U.S. government securities, shares of registered money market funds under Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act, securities issued by employees’ securities companies, securities issued by qualifying majority owned subsidiaries of such entity, and securities issued by qualifying companies that are controlled primarily by such entity. We do not believe that we are an “investment company” as such term is defined in either Section 3(a)(1)(A) or Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act.
Similar paragraph at 11 of 31 other Crypto companies: BTBT, CRCL, DFDV, DJT, GEMI, HSDT, HYPD, LITS and 3 moreWith respect to Section 3(a)(1)(A), following the June PIPE Offering, our ownership or holding of TRX tokens is in excess of 40% of our total assets. Since we believe that the TRX token is not an investment security, we do not hold ourselves out as being engaged primarily, or propose to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities within the meaning of Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act.
With respect to Section 3(a)(1)(C), we believe we satisfy the elements of Rule 3a-1 and therefore are deemed not to be an investment company under, and we intend to conduct our operations such that we will not be deemed an investment company under, Section 3(a)(1)(C). We believe that we are not an investment company pursuant to Rule 3a-1 under the Investment Company Act because, on a consolidated basis with respect to wholly-owned subsidiaries but otherwise on an unconsolidated basis, no more than 45% of the value of the Company’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities, shares of registered money market funds under Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act, and cash items) consists of, and no more than 45% of the Company’s net income after taxes (for the last four fiscal quarters combined) is derived from, securities other than U.S. government securities, shares of registered money market funds under Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act, securities issued by employees’ securities companies, securities issued by qualifying majority owned subsidiaries of the Company, and securities issued by qualifying companies that are controlled primarily by the Company.
TRX tokens and other digital assets, as well as new business models and transactions enabled by blockchain technologies, present novel interpretive questions under the Investment Company Act. There is a risk that assets or arrangements that we have concluded are not securities could be deemed to be securities by the SEC or another authority for purposes of the Investment Company Act, which would increase the percentage of securities held by us for Investment Company Act purposes. The SEC has requested information from a number of participants in the digital assets’ ecosystem, regarding the potential application of the Investment Company Act to their businesses. For example, in an action unrelated to the Company, in February 2022, the SEC issued a cease-and-desist order under the Investment Company Act to BlockFi Lending LLC, in which the SEC alleged that BlockFi was operating as an unregistered investment company because it issued securities and also held more than 40% of its total assets, excluding cash, in investment securities, including the loans of digital assets made by BlockFi to institutional borrowers.
If we were deemed to be an investment company, Rule 3a-2 under the Investment Company Act is a safe harbor that provides a one-year grace period for transient investment companies that have a bona fide intent to be engaged primarily, as soon as is reasonably possible (in any event by the termination of such one-year period), in a business other than that of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading in securities, with such intent evidenced by the company’s business activities and an appropriate resolution of its board of directors. The grace period is available not more than once every three years and runs from the earlier of (i) the date on which the issuer owns securities and/or cash having a value exceeding 50% of the issuer’s total assets on either a consolidated or unconsolidated basis or (ii) the date on which the issuer owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of such issuer’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Accordingly, the grace period may not be available at the time that we seek to rely on Rule 3a-2; however, Rule 3a-2 is a safe harbor and we may rely on any exemption or exclusion from investment company status available to us under the Investment Company Act at any given time. Furthermore, reliance on Rule 3a-2, Section 3(a)(1)(C), or Rule 3a-1 could require us to take actions to dispose of securities, limit our ability to make certain investments or enter into joint ventures, or otherwise limit or change our service offerings and operations. If we were to be deemed an investment company in the future, restrictions imposed by the Investment Company Act — including limitations on our ability to issue different classes of stock and equity compensation to directors, officers, and employees and restrictions on management, operations, and transactions with affiliated persons — likely would make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects.
We are not subject to legal and regulatory obligations that apply to investment companies such as mutual funds and exchange-traded funds, or to obligations applicable to investment advisers.
Similar paragraph at 12 of 31 other Crypto companies: ASST, DFDV, DJT, FWDI, HSDT, HYPD, LITS, MSTR and 4 moreMutual funds, ETFs and their directors and management are subject to extensive regulation as “investment companies” and “investment advisers” under U.S. federal and state law; this regulation is intended for the benefit and protection of investors. We are not subject to, and do not otherwise voluntarily comply with, these laws and regulations. This means, among other things, that the execution of or changes to our Treasury Reserve Policy or our TRX token strategy, our use of leverage, the manner in which our TRX tokens are custodied, our ability to engage in transactions with affiliated parties and our operating and investment activities generally are not subject to the extensive legal and regulatory requirements and prohibitions that apply to investment companies and investment advisers. For example, although a significant change to our Treasury Reserve Policy would require the approval of our Board, no shareholder or regulatory approval would be necessary. Consequently, our Board has broad discretion over the investment, leverage and cash management policies it authorizes, whether in respect of our TRX token holdings or other activities we may pursue, and has the power to change our current policies, including our strategy of acquiring and holding TRX tokens.
Similar paragraph at 13 of 31 other Crypto companies: ASST, BKKT, DFDV, DJT, FWDI, HSDT, HYPD, LITS and 5 moreOur TRX token strategy exposes us to risk of non-performance by counterparties in the future.
As of the date hereof, the Company does not have any material agreements with counterparties relating to the purchase or sale of TRX tokens. However, this may change in the future. Our TRX token strategy exposes us to the risk of non-performance by counterparties, whether contractual or otherwise. Risk of non-performance includes inability or refusal of a counterparty to perform because of a deterioration in the counterparty’s financial condition and liquidity or for any other reason. For example, our execution partners, or other counterparties might fail to perform in accordance with the terms of our agreements with them, which could result in a loss of TRX tokens, a loss of the opportunity to generate funds, or other losses.
If we pursue any strategies to create income streams or otherwise generate funds using our TRX token holdings, we would become subject to additional counterparty risks. Any significant non-performance by counterparties could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.
Further, the broader digital assets industry is subject to counterparty risks, which could adversely impact the adoption rate, price, and use of TRX tokens. A series of recent high-profile bankruptcies, closures, liquidations, regulatory enforcement actions and other events relating to companies operating in the digital asset industry have highlighted the counterparty risks applicable to owning and transacting in digital assets. Although these bankruptcies, closures, liquidations and other events have not resulted in any loss or misappropriation of our TRX tokens, nor have such events adversely impacted our access to our TRX tokens, they have, in the short-term, likely negatively impacted the adoption rate and use of the TRX tokens. Additional bankruptcies, closures, liquidations, regulatory enforcement actions or other events involving participants in the digital assets industry in the future may further negatively impact the adoption rate, price, and use of the TRX token, limit the availability to us of financing collateralized by TRX tokens, or create or expose additional counterparty risks. Changes in the accounting treatment of our TRX token holdings could have significant accounting impacts, including increasing the volatility of our results.
The broader digital assets industry, including the technology associated with digital assets, the rate of adoption and development of, and use cases for, digital assets, market perception of digital assets, and the legal, regulatory, and accounting treatment of digital assets are constantly developing and changing, and there may be additional risks in the future that are not possible to predict.
The price decrease of energy, a type of system resources on the TRON blockchain, could negatively affect the Company.
Bandwidth and energy are main types of resources on the TRON blockchain which are necessary for execution of different types of transactions. Except for query operations, the execution of all the transactions on the TRON blockchain consumes bandwidth. Bandwidth measures the byte size of a transaction on the blockchain. The larger the transaction is, the more bandwidth will be consumed. Energy measures the resources consumed by the TRON Virtual Machine (TVM) to execute a smart contract. Energy is only consumed when deploying or triggering a smart contract.
According to committee proposals available on Tronscan, the proposal #104 which proposed the modification of transaction fee of 1 unit of energy from 0.00021 TRX token to 0.0001 TRX token was approved by the SR and became effective on August 29, 2025. Because users consume energy to execute smart contracts on the TRON blockchain, the price decrease of energy has several implications and potential risks.
The effectiveness of proposal #104 means that less TRX is required to be burned (from 0.00021 TRX token to 0.0001 TRX token) to obtain a unit of energy; as a result, the cost for users to obtain energy through TRX burning decreases significantly, and therefore there will be less demand for energy rental. This change may:
(i) Lower the yields in the energy rental market, as evidenced by JustLend DAO’s downward adjustment of its base rate, which means the staking yield to be earned by the Company through sTRX generated from standard staking and energy rental is expected to be lower; this may cause the value of sTRX held by the Company to decline. Any such decline could negatively affect the Company’s return on its sTRX holdings, which in turn could negatively impact the Company. (ii) Lessen the deflationary pressure on the TRX token supply as fewer TRX tokens will be burned by users for obtaining energy. (iii) Increase the on-chain transaction volume as transaction costs are lower. (iv) Lower the TRX token threshold for executing smart contracts, which is expected to enable broader participation and expand the network’s active user base. (v) Lower the barriers for developers and dApps, which is expected to drive increased contract deployment and greater TRON ecosystem activity.
In 2023, the PRC government initiated a series of regulatory actions and statements to regulate business operations in certain areas in Mainland China, including cracking down on illegal activities in the securities market, enhancing supervision over Mainland China-based companies listed overseas using the variable interest entity structure, adopting new measures to extend the scope of cybersecurity reviews, and expanding the efforts in anti-monopoly enforcement. We are subject to PRC laws and regulations related to the current or future business operations of our subsidiary in Hong Kong and any changes in such laws and regulations and interpretations may impair its ability to operate profitably, which could result in a material negative impact on its operations and/or the value of our Common Stock or other securities.
Although we have direct ownership of our subsidiary in Hong Kong and currently do not have or intend to have any subsidiary or any contractual arrangement to establish a VIE structure with any entity in Mainland China, we are still subject to certain legal and operational risks associated with our connections to Hong Kong. The legal and operational risks associated in Mainland China also apply to our current or future operations in Hong Kong, and we face the risks and uncertainties associated with the complex and evolving PRC laws and regulations and as to whether and how the recent PRC government statements and regulatory developments, such as those relating to data and cyberspace security and anti-monopoly concerns, would be applicable to a company such as our subsidiary and our Company, given the Hong Kong aspects of our subsidiary in Hong Kong and the potential that the Chinese government may exercise significant oversight over the conduct of business in Hong Kong. In the event we were to become subject to PRC laws and regulations, we could incur material costs to ensure compliance, and might be subject to fines, experienced evaluation of securities or delisting, restrictions on securities offerings, and/or no longer be permitted to continue business operations as presently conducted. Our organizational structure involves risks to the investors, and Chinese regulatory authorities could disallow this structure, which would likely result in a material change in our subsidiary’s operations and/or a material change in the value of our Common Stock or other securities, including the risk that such event could cause the value of our Common Stock or other securities to decline. Moreover, there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of PRC laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the laws and regulations potentially related to our business and the enforcement and performance of our arrangements with customers in certain circumstances. The laws and regulations may be subject to future changes, and their official interpretation and enforcement may involve substantial uncertainty. The effectiveness and interpretation of newly enacted laws or regulations, including amendments to existing laws and regulations, may be delayed, and our business may be affected if we rely on laws and regulations which are subsequently adopted or interpreted in a manner different from our understanding of these laws and regulations. We cannot predict what effect the interpretation of existing or new PRC laws or regulations may have on our business.
Read in the 10-K ↗
The Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors, or the M&A Rules, adopted by six PRC regulatory agencies on August 8, 2006, and amended on June 22, 2009, requires an overseas special purpose vehicle formed for listing purposes through acquisitions of domestic companies in Mainland China and controlled by companies or individuals of Mainland China to obtain the approval of the CSRC, prior to the listing and trading of such special purpose vehicle’s securities on an overseas stock exchange. In addition, on December 24, 2021, the CSRC released the Administrative Regulations of the State Council Concerning the Oversea Issuance of Security and Listing by Domestic Enterprise (Draft for Comments) (the “Draft Administrative Regulations”) and the Measures for the Overseas Issuance of Securities and Listing Record-Filings by Domestic Enterprises (Draft for Comments) (the “Draft Filing Measures”), collectively the “Draft Rules on Overseas Listing”, for public opinion.
As of the date of this Annual Report, we have no subsidiary, VIE structure or any direct operations in Mainland China, nor do we intend to have any subsidiary or VIE structure or to acquire any equity interests in any domestic companies in Mainland China, and we have not generated any revenues or profits in Mainland China. Additionally, we do not intend to operate in Mainland China in the foreseeable future. As such, we do not believe we would be subject to the M&A Rules, or would be required to file with the CSRC under the Trial Measures. Moreover, pursuant to the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, or the Basic Law, PRC laws and regulations shall not be applied in Hong Kong except for those listed in Annex III of the Basic Law (which is confined to laws relating to national defense, foreign affairs and other matters that are not within the scope of autonomy). Therefore, we believe, as of the date of this Form 10-K, the CSRC’s approval or review is not required for the listing and trading of our Common Stock in the U.S. exchange as provided under the M&A Rules and the Trial Measures. We believe it is not necessary to obtain, and we have not obtained, an opinion from PRC or Hong Kong counsel to consult on the above.
SRM Ltd has two independent contractors in Hong Kong, which is a part of the PRC. In 2023, the PRC government initiated a series of regulatory actions and statements to regulate business operations in certain areas in China with little advance notice, including cracking down on illegal activities in the securities market, enhancing supervision over China-based companies listed overseas using a VIE structure, adopting new measures to extend the scope of cybersecurity reviews, and expanding its efforts in anti-monopoly enforcement. Since these statements and regulatory actions are new, it is highly uncertain how soon the legislative or administrative regulation making bodies will respond and what existing or new laws or regulations or detailed implementations and interpretations will be modified or promulgated, if any. It is also highly uncertain what the potential impact such modified or new laws and regulations will have on our Hong Kong subsidiary. These actions could result in a material change in the Hong Kong aspects of our operations and/or to the value of our Common Stock or other securities.
Statements by the PRC government have indicated an intent to exert more oversight and control over offerings that are conducted overseas and/or foreign investments in China based issuers. On July 6, 2021, the General Office of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council jointly issued a document to crack down on illegal activities in the securities markets and promote the high-quality development of the capital markets, which, among other things, requires the relevant governmental authorities to strengthen cross-border oversight of law-enforcement and judicial cooperation, to enhance supervision over China-based companies listed overseas, and to establish and improve the system of extraterritorial application of the PRC securities laws.
On December 24, 2021, the CSRC released the Draft Administrative Provisions and the Draft Filing Measures, both of which had a comment period that expired on January 23, 2022. The Draft Administrative Provisions and Draft Filing Measures regulate the administrative system, record-filing management, and other related rules in respect of the direct or indirect overseas issuance of listed and traded securities by “domestic enterprises”. The Draft Administrative Provisions specify that the CSRC has regulatory authority over the “overseas securities offering and listing by domestic enterprises”, and requires “domestic enterprises” to complete filing procedures with the CSRC if they wish to list overseas. On February 17, 2023, the CSRC released the Trial Measures and five supporting guidelines, which came into effect on March 31, 2023. According to the Trial Measures, domestic companies that seek to offer or list securities overseas, both directly and indirectly, should fulfill the filing procedures and report relevant information to the CSRC; any failure to comply with such filing procedures may result in administrative penalties, such as an order to rectify, warnings, and fines. On April 2, 2022, the CSRC published the Draft Archives Rules, for public comment. These rules state that in the overseas listing activities of domestic companies, domestic companies, as well as securities companies and securities service institutions providing relevant securities services thereof, should establish a sound system of confidentiality and archival work, shall not disclose state secrets, or harm the state and public interests.
Under the Trial Measures and the Guidance Rules and Notice, Chinese domestic companies conducting overseas securities offering and listing activities, either in direct or indirect form, shall complete filing procedures with the CSRC pursuant to the requirements of the Trial Measures within three working days following their submission of initial public offerings or listing application. The companies that have already been listed on overseas stock exchanges or have obtained the approval from overseas supervision administrations or stock exchanges for its offering and listing and will complete their overseas offering and listing prior to September 30, 2023 are not required to make immediate filings for its listing, yet need to make filings for subsequent offerings in accordance with the Trial Measures. Companies that have already submitted an application for an initial public offering to overseas supervision administrations prior to the effective date of the Trial Measures but have not yet obtained the approval from overseas supervision administrations or stock exchanges for the offering and listing, shall arrange for the filing within a reasonable time period and shall complete the filing procedure before such companies’ overseas issuance and listing.
Management understands that as of the date of this Form 10-K, the Company has no operations in Mainland China and is not required to complete filing procedures with the CSRC pursuant to the requirements of the Trial Measures. While the Company has no current operations in Mainland China, should we have any future operations in Mainland China and should we (i) fail to receive or maintain such permissions or approvals, (ii) inadvertently conclude that such permissions or approvals are not required, or (iii) applicable laws, regulations, or interpretations change and require us to obtain such permissions or approvals in the future, we may face sanctions by the CSRC, the CAC or other PRC regulatory agencies. These regulatory agencies may also impose fines and penalties on our potential operations in Mainland China, as well as limit our ability to pay dividends outside of Mainland China, limit our operations in Mainland China, delay or restrict the repatriation of the proceeds from our offerings into Mainland China or take other actions that could have a material adverse effect on our business as well as the trading price of our Common Stock or other securities. If we have PRC operations in the future, we may be required to restructure our operations to comply with such regulations or potentially cease operations in the PRC entirely. The CSRC, the CAC or other PRC regulatory agencies also may take actions requiring us, or making it advisable for us, to halt our offerings before settlement and delivery of our Common Stock or other securities. In addition, if the CSRC, the CAC or other regulatory PRC agencies later promulgate new rules requiring that we obtain their approvals for our offerings, we may be unable to obtain a waiver of such approval requirements, if and when procedures are established to obtain such a waiver. If we have PRC operations in the future, any action taken by the PRC government could significantly limit or completely hinder our operations in the PRC and our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors, and could cause the value of such securities to decline.
Furthermore, on July 10, 2021, the CAC issued a revised draft of the Measures for Cybersecurity Review for public comment, which required that, among others, in addition to any “operator of critical information infrastructure”, any “data processor” controlling personal information of no less than one million users which seeks to list in a foreign stock exchange should also be subject to cybersecurity review, and further elaborated the factors to be considered when assessing the national security risks of the relevant activities. On December 28, 2021, the CAC, the National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”), and several other administrations jointly issued the revised Measures for Cybersecurity Review, which became effective and replaced the existing Measures for Cybersecurity Review on February 15, 2022. According to the Revised Review Measures, if an “online platform operator” that is in possession of personal data of more than one million users intends to list in a foreign country, it must apply for a cybersecurity review. Based on a set of Q&A published on the official website of the State Cipher Code Administration in connection with the issuance of the Revised Review Measures, an official of the said administration indicated that an online platform operator should apply for a cybersecurity review prior to the submission of its listing application with non-PRC securities regulators. Moreover, the CAC released the draft of the Regulations on Network Data Security Management in November 2021 for public consultation, which among other things, stipulates that a data processor listed overseas must conduct an annual data security review by itself or by engaging a data security service provider and submit the annual data security review report for a given year to the municipal cybersecurity department before January 31 of the following year. Given the recency of the issuance of the Revised Review Measures and their pending effectiveness, there is a general lack of guidance and substantial uncertainties exist with respect to their interpretation and implementation. It remains unclear whether a Hong Kong company which collects personal information from PRC individuals shall be subject to the Revised Review Measures. We do not currently expect the Revised Review Measures to have an impact on our business, our operations or our offerings as we do not believe that our subsidiary would be deemed to be an “operator of critical information infrastructure” or a “data processor” controlling personal information of no less than one million users, that would be required to file for cybersecurity review before listing in the U.S.. However, there remains uncertainty in the interpretation and enforcement of relevant PRC cybersecurity laws and regulations. If the Revised Review Measures are adopted into law in the future and if our subsidiary is deemed to be an “operator of critical information infrastructure” or a “data processor” controlling personal information of no less than one million users, our operation and the listing of our Common Stock or other securities in the U.S. could be subject to CAC’s cybersecurity review.
As of the date of this Annual Report, Hong Kong does not have similar regulations as of the PRC to extend oversight and control over offerings that are conducted overseas. Hong Kong does not have similar regulation as of the Trial Measures and the Guidance Rules and Notice, and Measures for Cybersecurity Review of the PRC. However, the legal and operational risks associated in Mainland China apply to operations in Hong Kong, and we face the risks and uncertainties associated with the complex and evolving PRC laws and regulations and as to whether and how the recent PRC government statements and regulatory developments, such as those relating to data and cyberspace security and anti-monopoly concerns, would be applicable to a company such as our subsidiary and our Company, given the Hong Kong aspects of our subsidiary in Hong Kong and the possibility that the Chinese government may exercise significant oversight over the conduct of business in Hong Kong. In the event we or our subsidiary were to become subject to PRC laws and regulations, we could incur material costs to ensure compliance, and we or our subsidiary might be subject to fines, experienced evaluation of securities or delisting, restrictions on securities offerings, and/or no longer be permitted to continue business operations as presently conducted. In the event that (i) the PRC government expands the categories of industries and companies whose foreign securities offerings are subject to review by the CSRC or the CAC or if applicable laws, regulations or interpretations change and we are required to obtain such permissions or approvals, (ii) we inadvertently conclude that relevant permissions or approvals were not required or (iii) we did not receive or maintain relevant permissions or approvals required, any action taken by the PRC government could significantly limit or completely hinder our operations in Hong Kong and our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and could cause the value of our Common Stock or other securities to decline.
We believe that our current connections to Hong Kong are not substantial. Although SRM Ltd, our wholly-owned subsidiary is a Hong Kong company, it has only two independent contractors and its function is to provide administrative support for the procurement and delivery process which is controlled by the Company directly with its PRC suppliers. As to our TRX treasury business, our Treasury Wallet is located in Hong Kong; however, all operating decisions relating to the movement of TRX to and from the Treasury Wallet are made by our Board, a majority of whom are not based in Hong Kong or the PRC.
Certain of our operations are conducted in Hong Kong. It is possible that the Chinese government may exercise significant oversight and discretion over the conduct of such business and may influence such operations, which could potentially significantly interfere with, alter, limit or hinder our current presence in Hong Kong, and certain scenarios, possibly affect the value of our Common Stock or other securities. Changes in the policies, regulations, rules, and the enforcement of laws of the Chinese government may also occur quickly and our assertions and beliefs of the risk imposed by the PRC legal and regulatory system cannot be certain. There are uncertainties regarding the enforcement of PRC laws, and rules and regulations in China can change quickly with little advance notice. The Chinese government may intervene or influence the Hong Kong aspects of our operations, which could interfere with our operations and/or affect the value of the Common Stock or other securities we are registering for sale.
In 2023, the PRC government initiated a series of regulatory actions and statements to regulate business operations in certain areas in Mainland China, including a cracking down on illegal activities in the securities market, enhancing supervision over Mainland China-based companies listed overseas using the VIE structure, adopting new measures to extend the scope of cybersecurity reviews, and expanding the efforts in anti-monopoly enforcement. Given the recent statements by the Chinese government indicating an intent to exert more oversight and control over offerings that are conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in Mainland China-based issuers, any extension of these actions, statements or policies into Hong Kong could potentially significantly interfere with, alter, limit or hinder our current presence in Hong Kong.
There are uncertainties regarding the enforcement of PRC laws, and rules and regulations in China can change with little advance notice. The Chinese government may intervene or influence our Hong Kong subsidiary or our TRX treasury business at any time, which could result in a material change in the Hong Kong aspects of our operations and/or the value of the securities we are registering for sale.
It may be difficult to enforce a judgment of U.S. courts for civil liabilities under U.S. federal securities laws against us, our directors or officers in Mainland China and Hong Kong.
As of the date of this Annual Report, our Chairman and Director Mr. Weike Sun and our Director Mr. Zhihong Liu are based in Hong Kong. We do not have any directors or officers located in Mainland China. In addition, the Company retains sole control of the Treasury Wallet and private keys in Hong Kong, and Mr. Weike Sun and Mr. Zi Yang are authorized by the Board to make the arrangements for safeguarding and operating the private keys of the Treasury Wallet. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process within the U.S. upon such directors, or to enforce judgments obtained in U.S. courts against them in Mainland China or Hong Kong, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the U.S. or any state in the U.S. and whether in connection with any claim relating to the Treasury Wallet, or otherwise.
The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments are provided for under the PRC Civil Procedures Law. The PRC courts may recognize and enforce foreign judgments in accordance with the requirements of the PRC Civil Procedures Law based either on treaties between China and the country where the judgment is made or on principles of reciprocity between jurisdictions. China does not have any treaties or other forms of written arrangement with the United States that provide for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. In addition, according to the PRC Civil Procedures Law, the PRC courts will not enforce a foreign judgment if they decide that the judgment violates the basic principles of PRC laws or national sovereignty, security or public interest. As a result, it is uncertain whether and on what basis a PRC court would enforce a judgment rendered by a court in the United States. In addition, it will be difficult for U.S. shareholders to originate actions against us in China in accordance with PRC laws because it will be difficult for U.S. shareholders, by virtue only of holding our Common Stock or other securities, to establish a connection to the PRC for a PRC court to have jurisdiction as required under the PRC Civil Procedures Law.
There is also uncertainty as to whether the courts of Hong Kong would (i) recognize or enforce judgments of United States courts obtained against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States or (ii) entertain original actions brought in Hong Kong against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States. Currently, there are no treaties or reciprocity protocols in place between the U.S. and the PRC relating to the enforceability of civil judgments.
In Hong Kong, foreign judgments can be enforced under statute under the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance or under common law. The Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance is a registration scheme for the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments based on reciprocity but the United States is not a designated country under the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance. As a result, a judgment rendered by a court in the United States, including as a result of administrative actions brought by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC, and other actions, will not be enforced by the Hong Kong courts under the statutory regime. In addition, the Supreme People’s Court of the PRC and the Government of Hong Kong have entered into the “Arrangement on Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters by the Courts of the Mainland and of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region pursuant to Choice of Court Agreements between Parties Concerned,” or the Arrangement. The Mainland Judgements (Reciprocal Enforcement) Ordinance gave effect to the Arrangement and is a registration scheme for recognition and enforcement of PRC judgements based on reciprocity. Other than the Arrangement, Hong Kong has not entered into any multilateral convention or bilateral treaty regarding the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. Accordingly, any judgments rendered by a court in the United States will need to be enforced under common law. In order to enforce a foreign judgment under common law in Hong Kong, the judgment must meet certain criteria before it can be enforced, such as the judgment being final and conclusive.
The foregoing risks make it uncertain that stockholders or others will be able to obtain a legally binding judgment against the Company or our directors or officers, and if such a judgment is ultimately obtained, the process could be time consuming and costly. We believe it is not necessary to obtain, and we have not obtained, an opinion from PRC or Hong Kong counsel to consult on the above.
Read in the 10-K ↗
New in the latest 10-Q
8 paragraphs in the 10-Q filed Nov 6, 2026 with nothing like them in the 10-Q filed Aug 11, 2026 (at least half the words must differ; new numbers alone do not count). Quoted exactly, grouped by the item heading above them. This is text that changed, not a judgement of how serious it is.
Financial statements and notes
Balance, December 31, 2024 1,110,000 Options granted 2,025,000 Options exercised (1,320,000) Balance December 31, 2025 1,815,000 Options granted - Options exercised (50,000) Balance, September 30, 2026 1,765,000
Read in the 10-Q ↗
On October 14, 2026, the company entered into an At-the-Market (“ATM”) Sales Agreement under which we may sell shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $ 200 million. As of the date hereof, the Company had not issued or sold any shares of common stock under the ATM program, and $ 200 million remained available for issuance thereunder.
Read in the 10-Q ↗
On October 18, 2026, the Company (via its wholly owned subsidiaries) was successfully elected as one of the 27 Super Representative (“SR”) nodes on the TRON network, with a designated validator wallet (“Node Wallet”) serving as the operational address for the node, enabling participation in block production, transaction validation, and on-chain governance. As of the date hereof, the Company’s Super Representative (SR) node is one of the top ranked SRs. As an SR, the Company will receive rewards for production of blocks on the blockchain and voting, which will be accounted for as other income.
Read in the 10-Q ↗
On August 13, 2026, the Company announced its intention to pursue Super Representative (“SR”) status within the TRON blockchain network. As of September 30, 2026, the Company’s pursuit of SR status was in the strategic planning phase, and no material commitments or capital expenditures were incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2026. Effective October 18, 2026, the Company (via its wholly owned subsidiaries) was elected one of the 27 SR nodes on the TRON network, with a designated validator wallet (“Node Wallet”) serving as the operational address for the node. As of the date hereof, the company’s SR node is one of the top ranked SRs. As an SR, the Company will receive rewards for production of blocks on the blockchain and voting, which will be accounted for as other income.
Read in the 10-Q ↗
On October 14, 2026, the company entered into an At-the-Market (“ATM”) Sales Agreement under which we may sell shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $200 million. As of the date hereof, the Company had not issued or sold any shares of common stock under the ATM program, and $200 million remained available for issuance thereunder.
Read in the 10-Q ↗
On October 18, 2026, the Company (via its wholly owned subsidiaries) was successfully elected as one of the 27 Super Representative (“SR”) nodes on the TRON network, enabling participation in block production, transaction validation, and on-chain governance. As of the date hereof, the Company’s Super Representative (SR) node is one of the top ranked SRs. As an SR, the Company will receive rewards for production of blocks on the blockchain and voting, which will be accounted for as other income.
Read in the 10-Q ↗
Tron International Limited, our wholly owned subsidiary incorporated in Hong Kong, was formed to support the blockchain network operations, including the operation of SR node on the TRON network.
Read in the 10-Q ↗
On October 14, 2026, the company entered into an ATM Sales Agreement under which we may sell shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $200 million. As of September 30, 2026, the Company had not issued or sold any shares of common stock under the ATM program, and $200 million remained available for issuance thereunder.
Read in the 10-Q ↗
The 10-Q's risk factors against the 10-K
Item 1A of the 10-Q filed Nov 6, 2026 against Item 1A of the 10-K filed Mar 25, 2026.
A 10-Q repeats only the risks that changed, so a 10-K paragraph that is missing from it is not counted as removed.
Added is a paragraph with nothing like it in the 10-K, Reworded a sentence that is in both with several words changed,
Quiet changes a sentence in both where one to four words changed and one is a hedge or a modal
(cut words struck through, new words highlighted and underlined).
Text on the page, not a score; each links to the filing at sec.gov.
Work on TRON in a spreadsheet:
Excel workbook (a sheet per section, ten years by column, charts, links to the filings) ·
CSV.
For a Google Sheet that stays up to date, paste =IMPORTDATA("https://tickdelta.com/company/TRON/export.csv") into a cell.